Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

as suggested, we should clean the main distribution site from all the
previous versions of our products.

I can do it, but just in case anyone has an objection, please just reply to
this mail.

We currently eat 700 Mb, and we store those versions :
- ADS unstable 0.9.0 to 0.9.3 and ADS stable 1.0.RC1 to RC4, 1.0.0 and
1.0.1(the one we will keep)
- LdapStudio is pretty ok
- Mina unstable 0.7.1 to 0.7.4 and 0.9.0 to 0.9.5, we will only keep mina
1.0.0 stable

The cleaning will occurs on monday evening, Paris time.

-- 
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

If a simple svn merge makes the back port happen then why not to have a
tight 1.0?  This is mostly a matter of dependencies and making sure the sar
contents are correct.

Alex

On 3/12/07, Aron Sogor <as...@buni.org> wrote:
>
> I see little reason to back port if we have a bigger better thing working.
>
> Aron
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/07, *Aron Sogor* <asogor@buni.org <ma...@buni.org>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >     I am working on a project called Meldware at buni.org
> >     <http://buni.org>. I would like to
> >     expose our AddressBook to TBird/Evolution using LDAP.
> >
> >     I would like to resurrect your simple .sar deployment in JBOSS,
> >     and make
> >     it part of your the DS offering.  How stable is the 1.5 line, or
> >     better
> >     done in 1.0x line?
> >
> >
> > Aron to answer your question 1.5 is stable and usable with the dynamic
> > schema feature
> > and the almost operational replication capabilities.  Note however
> > that this (trunk) is our
> > feature introduction branch.  We use odd minor numbers to denote
> > feature introduction branches
> > as opposed to bug fix branches.
> >
> > 1.5.0 should be released sometime soon and it's a great time for us to
> > make sure that the sar
> > module actually works.  This would be the place to make your changes.
> > We could back port
> > your fixes to the sar module to the 1.0 branch as well.
> >
> >     After talking with Alex, what is everybody's feel,
> >     interest to collaborate?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Alex
>
>

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de>]

Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Stefan, we will work on this compliance asap.

I think 1.5.0 would already be compliant with respect to the BASE 
profile (it ever was), but we have not conducted the tests officially 
and filed the results etc. ..., so it is not "officially compliant" (== 
certified).

> I want it to be compliant before may :)

This would be great.

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Stefan, we will work on this compliance asap.

I want it to be compliant before may :)

On 3/12/07, Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> wrote:
>
> Aron Sogor wrote:
> > I see little reason to back port if we have a bigger better thing
> working.
> >
> > Aron
>
> The 1.0.x branch is certified by the Open Group, the 1.5.0 currently is
> not (and probably will not get certified in the near future, although it
> is compliant).
>
> Thus, back porting to 1.0 would be nice, if the merging effort is not
> that big.
>
> Greetings, Stefan
>
>
>


-- 
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de>]

Aron Sogor wrote:
> I see little reason to back port if we have a bigger better thing working.
> 
> Aron

The 1.0.x branch is certified by the Open Group, the 1.5.0 currently is 
not (and probably will not get certified in the near future, although it 
is compliant).

Thus, back porting to 1.0 would be nice, if the merging effort is not 
that big.

Greetings, Stefan

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Aron Sogor <as...@buni.org>]

I see little reason to back port if we have a bigger better thing working.

Aron
Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/12/07, *Aron Sogor* <asogor@buni.org <ma...@buni.org>> 
> wrote:
>
>
>     I am working on a project called Meldware at buni.org
>     <http://buni.org>. I would like to
>     expose our AddressBook to TBird/Evolution using LDAP.
>
>     I would like to resurrect your simple .sar deployment in JBOSS,
>     and make
>     it part of your the DS offering.  How stable is the 1.5 line, or
>     better
>     done in 1.0x line? 
>
>
> Aron to answer your question 1.5 is stable and usable with the dynamic 
> schema feature
> and the almost operational replication capabilities.  Note however 
> that this (trunk) is our
> feature introduction branch.  We use odd minor numbers to denote 
> feature introduction branches
> as opposed to bug fix branches.
>  
> 1.5.0 should be released sometime soon and it's a great time for us to 
> make sure that the sar
> module actually works.  This would be the place to make your changes.  
> We could back port
> your fixes to the sar module to the 1.0 branch as well.
>
>     After talking with Alex, what is everybody's feel,
>     interest to collaborate?
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Alex

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

On 3/12/07, Aron Sogor <as...@buni.org> wrote:
>
>
> I am working on a project called Meldware at buni.org. I would like to
> expose our AddressBook to TBird/Evolution using LDAP.
>
> I would like to resurrect your simple .sar deployment in JBOSS, and make
> it part of your the DS offering.  How stable is the 1.5 line, or better
> done in 1.0x line?


Aron to answer your question 1.5 is stable and usable with the dynamic
schema feature
and the almost operational replication capabilities.  Note however that this
(trunk) is our
feature introduction branch.  We use odd minor numbers to denote feature
introduction branches
as opposed to bug fix branches.

1.5.0 should be released sometime soon and it's a great time for us to make
sure that the sar
module actually works.  This would be the place to make your changes.  We
could back port
your fixes to the sar module to the 1.0 branch as well.

After talking with Alex, what is everybody's feel,
> interest to collaborate?
>


Thoughts?

Alex

Re: Deployment in JBoss

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

Hi all,

I spoke to Aron last week after an introduction from Andy Oliver.  He's
interested
in making ApacheDS work with JBoss and their interesting project at buni.org.
I
had asked Aron to post to the list so we could introduce him to the group.

Alex

3/12/07, Aron Sogor <as...@buni.org> wrote:
>
>
> I am working on a project called Meldware at buni.org. I would like to
> expose our AddressBook to TBird/Evolution using LDAP.
>
> I would like to resurrect your simple .sar deployment in JBOSS, and make
> it part of your the DS offering.  How stable is the 1.5 line, or better
> done in 1.0x line? After talking with Alex, what is everybody's feel,
> interest to collaborate?
>
> Aron
>

Deployment in JBoss

[Aron Sogor <as...@buni.org>]

I am working on a project called Meldware at buni.org. I would like to 
expose our AddressBook to TBird/Evolution using LDAP.

I would like to resurrect your simple .sar deployment in JBOSS, and make 
it part of your the DS offering.  How stable is the 1.5 line, or better 
done in 1.0x line? After talking with Alex, what is everybody's feel, 
interest to collaborate?

Aron

Re: Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

Oh ok that's good.  Thanks --Alex

On 3/11/07, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/12/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Cool so these old distros will be available there then?
>
>
> Yep.   Henk Penning told me it will be there even if we delete the old
> files in dist.
>
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6

Re: Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>]

On 3/12/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Cool so these old distros will be available there then?


Yep.   Henk Penning told me it will be there even if we delete the old files
in dist.

Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6

Re: Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

Cool so these old distros will be available there then?

Alex

On 3/11/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alex Karasulu a écrit :
>
> > That's great let's flush it out.  I think we can push old versions to
> > some
> > archive area.
>
> There is already an archive area : archive.apache.org. It's rsynced.
>
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > On 3/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> as suggested, we should clean the main distribution site from all the
> >> previous versions of our products.
> >>
> >> I can do it, but just in case anyone has an objection, please just
> reply
> >> to this mail.
> >>
> >> We currently eat 700 Mb, and we store those versions :
> >> - ADS unstable 0.9.0 to 0.9.3 and ADS stable 1.0.RC1 to RC4, 1.0.0 and
> >> 1.0.1 (the one we will keep)
> >> - LdapStudio is pretty ok
> >> - Mina unstable 0.7.1 to 0.7.4 and 0.9.0 to 0.9.5, we will only keep
> >> mina
> >> 1.0.0 stable
> >>
> >> The cleaning will occurs on monday evening, Paris time.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cordialement,
> >> Emmanuel Lécharny
> >> www.iktek.com
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>]

Alex Karasulu a écrit :

> That's great let's flush it out.  I think we can push old versions to 
> some
> archive area.

There is already an archive area : archive.apache.org. It's rsynced.

> Alex
>
>
> On 3/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> as suggested, we should clean the main distribution site from all the
>> previous versions of our products.
>>
>> I can do it, but just in case anyone has an objection, please just reply
>> to this mail.
>>
>> We currently eat 700 Mb, and we store those versions :
>> - ADS unstable 0.9.0 to 0.9.3 and ADS stable 1.0.RC1 to RC4, 1.0.0 and
>> 1.0.1 (the one we will keep)
>> - LdapStudio is pretty ok
>> - Mina unstable 0.7.1 to 0.7.4 and 0.9.0 to 0.9.5, we will only keep 
>> mina
>> 1.0.0 stable
>>
>> The cleaning will occurs on monday evening, Paris time.
>>
>> -- 
>> Cordialement,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com
>
>

Re: Cleaning www.apache.org/dist

[Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>]

That's great let's flush it out.  I think we can push old versions to some
archive area.

Alex


On 3/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> as suggested, we should clean the main distribution site from all the
> previous versions of our products.
>
> I can do it, but just in case anyone has an objection, please just reply
> to this mail.
>
> We currently eat 700 Mb, and we store those versions :
> - ADS unstable 0.9.0 to 0.9.3 and ADS stable 1.0.RC1 to RC4, 1.0.0 and
> 1.0.1 (the one we will keep)
> - LdapStudio is pretty ok
> - Mina unstable 0.7.1 to 0.7.4 and 0.9.0 to 0.9.5, we will only keep mina
> 1.0.0 stable
>
> The cleaning will occurs on monday evening, Paris time.
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com