You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Brian Behlendorf <br...@hyperreal.org> on 1998/07/17 02:40:57 UTC
Re: [BUG] Win32 assert: sub_canonical_filename() called with
szFile==""
At 02:27 PM 7/16/98 -0600, Marc Slemko wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
>
>> Once we're clear on what we need to support exactly, we can have the
>> patch ready sometime between today and Monday.
>
>No rush, it will not make 1.3.1 anyway.
I am in favor of holding 1.3.1 until mid next week, if a path out of this
pathname sillyness is on tap.
Brian
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices | brian@apache.org
acquired by the age of eighteen." - Einstein | brian@hyperreal.org
Re: [BUG] Win32 assert: sub_canonical_filename() called with
szFile==""
Posted by Ben Hyde <bh...@pobox.com>.
I entirely agree with Marc, see if it can get out as is.
The hypothetical end to sillyness isn't worth
the delay. - ben hyde
Re: [BUG] Win32 assert: sub_canonical_filename() called with szFile==""
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> No.
>
> We have been far too long with it already, there are other win32 problems
> far more important than this that aren't getting solved yet either, it may
> well take a week or two of debugging after it goes in to make it work,
> etc.
>
> The current tree works, for some definition of works. We need to accept
> that on win32 and move forward.
I agree with Marc. "To-day is a good day to die! I say, ship it!"
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/>
Apache Group member <http://www.apache.org/>
"Apache Server for Dummies" <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/ASFD/>
Re: [BUG] Win32 assert: sub_canonical_filename() called with
szFile==""
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>.
No.
We have been far too long with it already, there are other win32 problems
far more important than this that aren't getting solved yet either, it may
well take a week or two of debugging after it goes in to make it work,
etc.
The current tree works, for some definition of works. We need to accept
that on win32 and move forward.
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> At 02:27 PM 7/16/98 -0600, Marc Slemko wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> >
> >> Once we're clear on what we need to support exactly, we can have the
> >> patch ready sometime between today and Monday.
> >
> >No rush, it will not make 1.3.1 anyway.
>
> I am in favor of holding 1.3.1 until mid next week, if a path out of this
> pathname sillyness is on tap.
>
> Brian
>
>
> --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> "Common sense is the collection of prejudices | brian@apache.org
> acquired by the age of eighteen." - Einstein | brian@hyperreal.org
>