You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by AltGrendel <al...@exit0.us> on 2004/07/02 15:30:41 UTC
Re: ANNOUNCE: New whitelist source: public companies' domains
[SCANNED]
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:09, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 6:32:12 AM, David Thurman wrote:
> > On 7/1/04 8:19 AM, "jdow" wrote:
>
> >> OK, what if a spam company trades publicly?
>
> > Get them delisted ;)
>
> Seriously, yes. The more public a company is, the more they have
> to lose by breaking the law. Therefore public companies will
> tend not to be spammers. It's no guarantee of course, but
> perhaps an increased probability.
>
This is why you read about sub-sub-sub-contracting for this stuff. It
give the public company the "plausible deny-ability" card.
--------------------------------------------------------
A man can have two, maybe three love affairs while he's married. After
that it's cheating. -- Yves Montand
--------------------------------------------------------
Re: ANNOUNCE: New whitelist source: public companies' domains [SCANNED]
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
On Friday, July 2, 2004, 6:30:41 AM, AltGrendel AltGrendel wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:09, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 6:32:12 AM, David Thurman wrote:
>> > On 7/1/04 8:19 AM, "jdow" wrote:
>>
>> >> OK, what if a spam company trades publicly?
>>
>> > Get them delisted ;)
>>
>> Seriously, yes. The more public a company is, the more they have
>> to lose by breaking the law. Therefore public companies will
>> tend not to be spammers. It's no guarantee of course, but
>> perhaps an increased probability.
> This is why you read about sub-sub-sub-contracting for this stuff. It
> give the public company the "plausible deny-ability" card.
If a subcontractor is a spamhaus, their sending servers will
probably end up blocked on ordinary RBLs eventually.... QED
For SURBLs, which look at message body URIs, we need to minimize
collateral damage so that messages that innocently mention
mostly legitimate domains don't get blocked for mentioning them.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/
Re: ANNOUNCE: New whitelist source: public companies' domains
[SCANNED] [SCANNED]
Posted by David Thurman <li...@webpresencegroup.net>.
On 7/2/04 8:30 AM, "AltGrendel" wrote:
>>>> OK, what if a spam company trades publicly?
>>
>>> Get them delisted ;)
>>
>> Seriously, yes. The more public a company is, the more they have
>> to lose by breaking the law. Therefore public companies will
>> tend not to be spammers. It's no guarantee of course, but
>> perhaps an increased probability.
>>
>
> This is why you read about sub-sub-sub-contracting for this stuff. It
> give the public company the "plausible deny-ability" card.
Sort of how the CIA works.
--
David Thurman
The Web Presence Group
http://www.the-presence.com
Web Development/E-Commerce/CMS/Hosting/Dedicated Servers
800-399-6441/309-679-0774