You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org> on 2005/12/16 17:59:53 UTC
proposal : lets do an RC for a week or so before leaping to the 1.0 ?
[Re: [VOTE] geronimo-1.0 (3rd try)]
subject line says it all. We also need to figure out what to do
about the press release...
geir
On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
> Due to amount of problems reported, I too change my vote to a -1.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: proposal : lets do an RC for a week or so before leaping to the
1.0 ? [Re: [VOTE] geronimo-1.0 (3rd try)]
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Geir,
>
> We need to fix the outstanding issues so here is no argument
> there. I talked to Jencks this morning and it looks like there is
> an issue with dependencies not working correctly.
>
> the DayTrader issues are not in the application but rather in that
> the web app appears to be initializing before the EJB container is
> initialized and is causing the object not found exeception. This
> needs to be fixed. Dave and I are chasing this down today.
Great on both - I had no doubt this would be the case. What do you
think we should do as a release plan?
>
> Regarding the press release we've updated the Geronimo web site to
> let folks know that it really isn't out yet. For the time being I
> see that as being covered although I'm interested in how to do the
> release when its actually ready. It was unfortunate that the
> release went out when we were clearly not ready. Thoughts on how
> to address that issue?
Yes.
geir
>
> Matt
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> subject line says it all. We also need to figure out what to do
>> about the press release...
>> geir
>> On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>>> Due to amount of problems reported, I too change my vote to a -1.
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: proposal : lets do an RC for a week or so before leaping to the
1.0 ? [Re: [VOTE] geronimo-1.0 (3rd try)]
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Geir,
We need to fix the outstanding issues so here is no argument there. I talked to
Jencks this morning and it looks like there is an issue with dependencies not
working correctly.
the DayTrader issues are not in the application but rather in that the web app
appears to be initializing before the EJB container is initialized and is
causing the object not found exeception. This needs to be fixed. Dave and I
are chasing this down today.
Regarding the press release we've updated the Geronimo web site to let folks
know that it really isn't out yet. For the time being I see that as being
covered although I'm interested in how to do the release when its actually
ready. It was unfortunate that the release went out when we were clearly not
ready. Thoughts on how to address that issue?
Matt
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> subject line says it all. We also need to figure out what to do about
> the press release...
>
> geir
>
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>> Due to amount of problems reported, I too change my vote to a -1.
>
>