You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2003/06/09 14:50:50 UTC
RE: svn commit: rev 6173 - in trunk: . doc/book doc/book/book doc/translations/french doc/user notes subversion/bindings/java/javahl/native subversion/bindings/java/javahl/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl subversion/bindings/ruby subversion/clients/cmdlin
> From: cmpilato@collab.net [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:48 PM
[...]
> Perhaps we can explore other options, like making revert prompt you
> first:
>
> $ svn revert -R .
> The operation you are about to perform will throw away any changes
> you've made to the target path(s). Are you sure you want to do
> this? [y/N]
>
> And then add a configuration variable 'revert-no-prompt = no' for a
> sort of "expert mode". Would the list-folk be okay with a solution
> like this?
+1! I've thought about that, but I didn't post because I didn't
want to be the poor bugger to suggest an option... ;) :)
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: rev 6173 - in trunk: . doc/book doc/book/book doc/translations/french doc/user notes subversion/bindings/java/javahl/native subversion/bindings/java/javahl/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl subversion/bindings/ruby subversion/clients/cmdlin
Posted by cm...@collab.net.
kfogel@collab.net writes:
> "Sander Striker" <st...@apache.org> writes:
> > > And then add a configuration variable 'revert-no-prompt = no' for a
> > > sort of "expert mode". Would the list-folk be okay with a solution
> > > like this?
> >
> > +1! I've thought about that, but I didn't post because I didn't
> > want to be the poor bugger to suggest an option... ;) :)
>
> Backed out the change with pleasure, but waaaay -1 on this alternate
> solution. Yick :-). What's so bad about just changing the name of
> the "resolve" command instead? Solves the problem, minimal code
> change, no annoying options...
Nothing so bad about that solution. Was just offering other another
one for people to toy with so we don't have to revisit this again
later. Renaming 'resolve' is perfectly fine with me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: rev 6173 - in trunk: . doc/book doc/book/book doc/translations/french doc/user notes subversion/bindings/java/javahl/native subversion/bindings/java/javahl/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl subversion/bindings/ruby subversion/clients/cmdlin
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Sander Striker" <st...@apache.org> writes:
> > And then add a configuration variable 'revert-no-prompt = no' for a
> > sort of "expert mode". Would the list-folk be okay with a solution
> > like this?
>
> +1! I've thought about that, but I didn't post because I didn't
> want to be the poor bugger to suggest an option... ;) :)
Backed out the change with pleasure, but waaaay -1 on this alternate
solution. Yick :-). What's so bad about just changing the name of
the "resolve" command instead? Solves the problem, minimal code
change, no annoying options...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org