You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/23 16:17:00 UTC
Quick note about Marker construction and null.
There's no point in using a null-named Marker, right? Many methods don't
allow for a null argument for Marker name, but the constructor does. I'm
going to change this.
--
Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
Re: Quick note about Marker construction and null.
Posted by Bruce Brouwer <br...@gmail.com>.
It sounds reasonable to me to require a non-null name.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's no point in using a null-named Marker, right? Many methods don't
> allow for a null argument for Marker name, but the constructor does. I'm
> going to change this.
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>
>
--
Bruce Brouwer