You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2005/03/11 07:13:52 UTC

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-606) gbeans in an application plan have no module component in their name

gbeans in an application plan have no module component in their name
--------------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: GERONIMO-606
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-606
     Project: Geronimo
        Type: Bug
  Components: deployment  
    Versions: 1.0-M3    
    Reporter: David Jencks
 Assigned to: David Jencks 


If you have gbeans in an application plan their names have no component "J2EEModule=foo".  Furthermore, references specifying only the name component will look for a gbean with a "null=null" component instead of J2EEModule=foo.  I think this is because the ear-level j2eeContext has no module component, since there isn't really a module.

What should the "module" component be for a gbean that is in an application but no module?  Should we name them 
J2EEApplication=appname,J2EEModule=null
whereas a gbean in a gbean plan gets
J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=moduleName?


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-606) gbeans in an application plan have no module component in their name

Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-606?page=history ]
     
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-606:
---------------------------------

     Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version: 1.0-M4

Fixed in rev 157340, added J2EEModule=null to gbean names from application plan.

> gbeans in an application plan have no module component in their name
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-606
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-606
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: deployment
>     Versions: 1.0-M3
>     Reporter: David Jencks
>     Assignee: David Jencks
>      Fix For: 1.0-M4

>
> If you have gbeans in an application plan their names have no component "J2EEModule=foo".  Furthermore, references specifying only the name component will look for a gbean with a "null=null" component instead of J2EEModule=foo.  I think this is because the ear-level j2eeContext has no module component, since there isn't really a module.
> What should the "module" component be for a gbean that is in an application but no module?  Should we name them 
> J2EEApplication=appname,J2EEModule=null
> whereas a gbean in a gbean plan gets
> J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=moduleName?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira