Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>]

Hey Guys,

It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:

DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)

I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be release
manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel free
to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.

Thanks,
Jacques

Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>]

>> Let me know if you need my help in that part.

Yes, I would love your help

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Aditya <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> We should also start publishing the Drill jars as maven artifacts from this
> release. I have created an infra ticket to start the process.
>
> Let me know if you need my help in that part.
>
> aditya...
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Julian Hyde <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Let me know if I can help with the Calcite task.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > > On Apr 16, 2015, at 18:23, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Guys,
> > >
> > > It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> > > think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> > > candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
> > >
> > > DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> > > DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> > > DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> > > DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> > > DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> > > DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
> > >
> > > I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be
> > release
> > > manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> > > otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel
> > free
> > > to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> > > around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> >
>

Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Aditya <ad...@gmail.com>]

+1.

We should also start publishing the Drill jars as maven artifacts from this
release. I have created an infra ticket to start the process.

Let me know if you need my help in that part.

aditya...

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Julian Hyde <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Let me know if I can help with the Calcite task.
>
> Julian
>
> > On Apr 16, 2015, at 18:23, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> > think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> > candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
> >
> > DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> > DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> > DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> > DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> > DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> > DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
> >
> > I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be
> release
> > manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> > otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel
> free
> > to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> > around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
>

Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Julian Hyde <ju...@gmail.com>]

+1

Let me know if I can help with the Calcite task.

Julian

> On Apr 16, 2015, at 18:23, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hey Guys,
> 
> It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
> 
> DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
> 
> I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be release
> manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel free
> to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jacques

Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Aman Sinha <as...@maprtech.com>]

Clarification: DRILL-2479 is already fixed after the Calcite rebasing.  I
will update the JIRA and add a test case.
DRILL-1957 is the one that is remaining - it is going through testing and
review (I did not realize it was not in your original list for 0.9).

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> It looks like all of these issues are closed with the exception of
> DRILL-2479.  I'm going to cut a release EOD today whether or not 2479 gets
> in as we need to get another release out.
>
> Expect a release candidate shortly.
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> > think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> > candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
> >
> > DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> > DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> > DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> > DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> > DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> > DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
> >
> > I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be
> release
> > manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> > otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel
> free
> > to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> > around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
>

Re: Isn't it about time for a 0.9.0?

[Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org>]

It looks like all of these issues are closed with the exception of
DRILL-2479.  I'm going to cut a release EOD today whether or not 2479 gets
in as we need to get another release out.

Expect a release candidate shortly.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Jacques Nadeau <ja...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey Guys,
>
> It looks like it is about time to start prepping for a 0.9 release.  I
> think we need to get a few last things into 0.9 and can then get a
> candidate up for vote.  Here are my shortlist to include in 0.9:
>
> DRILL-1384 (Get off Calcite fork)
> DRILL-2479 (Correlated EXISTS containing an IN subquery fails to plan)
> DRILL-2712 (infinite prune)
> DRILL-2813 (Hive row count parse issue.)
> DRILL-2370/2762 (Distributed state issues)
> DRILL-2514/2413 (Impersonation)
>
> I believe all are sitting in or near review.  I'll volunteer to be release
> manager unless someone else is interested in doing it.  Unless I hear
> otherwise, I'm going to create a release branch shortly.  Please feel free
> to merge into master.  I'll probably just pick a fork point before any
> around the tip depending on the nature of the merges.
>
> Thanks,
> Jacques
>