You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@solr.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/12/09 16:26:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-17541) LBSolrClient implementations should agree on 'getClient()' semantics
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
ASF GitHub Bot updated SOLR-17541:
----------------------------------
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> LBSolrClient implementations should agree on 'getClient()' semantics
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17541
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17541
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Affects Versions: 9.7
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LBSolrClient has an abstract "getClient(String url)" method that is used to fetch a "Http" SolrClient appropriate for the specified URL.
> But implementations of this method differ in the client that is returned. LBHttpSolrClient returns a client that is already pointed at the specified URL and can be used without modification. But LBHttp2SolrClient returns a client with no URL altogether, that must be pointed at the right endpoint prior to use. This is a bit messy, and complicates the calling code in LBSolrClient quite a bit.
> We should choose one of these approaches and use it for all LBSolrClient implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@solr.apache.org