You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Francis Daly <de...@daoine.org> on 2002/11/26 14:32:35 UTC

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

I'm not sure if this should go to dev or docs, but I'll try here as I
suspect that it is due to a recent change by someone here.  Sorry if
I've got this bit wrong.

The web page returned from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ looks
strangely blank in my browser right now, almost certainly because
there are 10 "<table"s and only 9 "</table"s, and this browser is
easily confused.

All the best,

	f
-- 
Francis Daly        deva@daoine.org

Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> At 11:19 AM 11/26/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>>That's my doing, certainly.  Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen'
>>magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ?  I brought
>>the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out.

Fortunately the build.cmd and build2.cmd from the docs build stuff work 
here, too. You may just copy both into the httpd-site root and run `build`.
(needs java runtime, of course...)

nd
-- 
die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker
]
;-)
# André Malo, <http://www.perlig.de/> #

Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 11:19 AM 11/26/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>That's my doing, certainly.  Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen'
>magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ?  I brought
>the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out.

Thanks to Andre for taking this!

Bill


Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Francis Daly wrote:

> The web page returned from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ looks
> strangely blank in my browser right now, almost certainly because
> there are 10 "<table"s and only 9 "</table"s, and this browser is
> easily confused.

don't know, how this comes (manual editing?). Just ran the transformation 
again and the document works fine. Someone should check it out, so it may 
appear on the website.

Thanks for the report!

nd
-- 
s;.*;aaaaaoaaaoaaaaooooaaoaaaomaaaa:a:alataa:aaoat:a:a:a
maoaa:a:laoata:a:oia:a:o:a:m:a:o:alaoooat:aaool:aaoaa
matooololaaatoto:aaa:o:a:o:m;;s:\s:\::g;y;mailto:;
\40\51/\134\137|ndparker <nd...@perlig.de>;;print;

Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 11:19 AM 11/26/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>That's my doing, certainly.  Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen'
>magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ?  I brought
>the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out.

Thanks to Andre for taking this!

Bill


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 07:32 AM 11/26/2002, Francis Daly wrote:
>I'm not sure if this should go to dev or docs, but I'll try here as I
>suspect that it is due to a recent change by someone here.  Sorry if
>I've got this bit wrong.

I'm cc'ing docs

>The web page returned from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ looks
>strangely blank in my browser right now, almost certainly because
>there are 10 "<table"s and only 9 "</table"s, and this browser is
>easily confused.

That's my doing, certainly.  Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen'
magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ?  I brought
the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out.

Thanks.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 07:32 AM 11/26/2002, Francis Daly wrote:
>I'm not sure if this should go to dev or docs, but I'll try here as I
>suspect that it is due to a recent change by someone here.  Sorry if
>I've got this bit wrong.

I'm cc'ing docs

>The web page returned from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ looks
>strangely blank in my browser right now, almost certainly because
>there are 10 "<table"s and only 9 "</table"s, and this browser is
>easily confused.

That's my doing, certainly.  Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen'
magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ?  I brought
the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out.

Thanks.