[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-411) Add Hash Password Rewrite to File Realm

["Aaron Mulder (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411?page=all ]

Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-411:
----------------------------------

    Fix Version: 1.0
    Description: 
It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:

user1=plaintext
user2=MD5{...}
user3=SHA1{...}

Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.

I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.

  was:
It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:

user1=plaintext
user2=MD5{...}
user3=SHA1{...}

Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.

I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.

    Environment: 

> Add Hash Password Rewrite to File Realm
> ---------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-411
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: security
>     Versions: 1.0-M2
>     Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 1.0

>
> It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:
> user1=plaintext
> user2=MD5{...}
> user3=SHA1{...}
> Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.
> I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-411) Add Hash Password Rewrite to File Realm

[Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>]

Is this something we should do in the plans as well (i.e. SSL certs, etc)?

Aaron Mulder (JIRA) wrote:
>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411?page=all ]
> 
> Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-411:
> ----------------------------------
> 
>     Fix Version: 1.0
>     Description: 
> It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:
> 
> user1=plaintext
> user2=MD5{...}
> user3=SHA1{...}
> 
> Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.
> 
> I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.
> 
>   was:
> It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:
> 
> user1=plaintext
> user2=MD5{...}
> user3=SHA1{...}
> 
> Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.
> 
> I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.
> 
>     Environment: 
> 
> 
>>Add Hash Password Rewrite to File Realm
>>---------------------------------------
>>
>>         Key: GERONIMO-411
>>         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411
>>     Project: Geronimo
>>        Type: Improvement
>>  Components: security
>>    Versions: 1.0-M2
>>    Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>>    Priority: Minor
>>     Fix For: 1.0
> 
> 
>>It would be nice if the properties file realm could rewrite your properties file with hashed passwords when it reads it.  We would need to be able to recognize hashed vs. unhashed entries and perhaps even different algorithms.  Perhaps it could go like this:
>>user1=plaintext
>>user2=MD5{...}
>>user3=SHA1{...}
>>Anyway, the idea is that this could be a reasonably secure alternative, but you still wouldn't need to manually hash things to add or update entries -- just put a plain text entry in and the next time the server reads the file it would hash it for you.
>>I guess we'd need to synchronize on the hash operation to avoid threading problems if multiple apps or whatever use the same properties file, but it shouldn't be bad if we only rewrite the file if we find any plain text entries.
> 
>