You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Todd Volkert (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/04/22 17:37:47 UTC
[jira] Updated: (LEGAL-48) Legal category for GPLv3 license
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-48?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Todd Volkert updated LEGAL-48:
------------------------------
Summary: Legal category for GPLv3 license (was: Legal cateogry for GPLv3 license)
Fixed typo in description
> Legal category for GPLv3 license
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-48
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-48
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Todd Volkert
>
> I've read that GPLv3 is definitely compatible with the Apache 2 license, yet our third party licensing policy page (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) lumps GPLv2 and GPLv3 together as "GNU GPL". It seems like the licensing policy page is out of date, but maybe I'm missing something -- is there an explicit reason why GPLv3 is in Category X?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org