You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> on 2012/11/15 23:39:52 UTC
[DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
-- Lars
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Cool. Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this? (I know I
> could just search, but asking is easier :) )
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> > To: hbase-dev <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
> >
> > While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I
> cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> > In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues,
> correct?
> >
> > Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
> >
> > If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
> >
> > -- Lars
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
Awesome. Thanks Andy and Jimmy.
I'll try to knock his stuff off for 0.94.4.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
I linked some stuff to and made some others subtasks of HBASE-5261.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> That's what I know:
>
> HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
> HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
> HBASE-7113
> HBASE-6915
> HBASE-6917
> HBASE-6921
> HBASE-6355
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
> >>
> >
> > HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> > currently maintained as one.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I linked some stuff to and made some others subtasks of HBASE-5261.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> That's what I know:
>
> HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
> HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
> HBASE-7113
> HBASE-6915
> HBASE-6917
> HBASE-6921
> HBASE-6355
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
> >>
> >
> > HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> > currently maintained as one.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>.
That's what I know:
HBASE-6182 (HBASE-6181, HBASE-6202, HBASE-6206)
HBASE-7130 (a little trick, need to ignore the pb related stuff)
HBASE-7113
HBASE-6915
HBASE-6917
HBASE-6921
HBASE-6355
Thanks,
Jimmy
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
>>
>
> HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
> currently maintained as one.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this?
>
HBASE-5261 could be an umbrella JIRA for JDK7 related work but isn't
currently maintained as one.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
Cool. Is there a list of jiras (or a toplevel jira) for this? (I know I could just search, but asking is easier :) )
________________________________
From: Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> To: hbase-dev <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
>
> While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
>
> Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
>
> If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
>
> -- Lars
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by Jimmy Xiang <jx...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
> To: hbase-dev <de...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
>
> While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
>
> Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
>
> If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
>
> -- Lars
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 fixes to 0.94?
Posted by lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>.
Sigh... Backport JDK7 *fixes*?
________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>
To: hbase-dev <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:39 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues, correct?
Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
-- Lars
Re: [DISCUSS] Backport JDK7 to 0.94?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
I'm in favor of this but suspect some failures will be ratholes.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:39 PM, lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> While trying to fix TestSplitTransactionOnCluster I found that 0.94 I
> cannot run it at all with JDK7 (it just times out).
> In HBase trunk we fixed these and most of the other JDK7 related issues,
> correct?
>
> Should we backport these fixes to 0.94?
>
> If these changes are not too extensive, I'd vote"yes".
>
> -- Lars
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)