You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/28 03:49:49 UTC
[discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from me
is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent
openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.
But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb
is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things
for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we
might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.
[1]
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html
--
Shawn
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by gqmulligan <gq...@gmail.com>.
The Jira fix I really want in the release is found
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6171 here .
My original explanation can also be found
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/ISSUE-Root-context-puts-double-backslash-quot-quot-in-urls-td3985029.html
here .
I am looking forward to this release.
Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/discussion-Time-to-release-to-Geronimo-2-2-2-tp3985282p3985522.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
if you are talking about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6186
the patch there is to upgrade EJB to 3.1 and JPA to 2.0. I don't know if
it's allowed for a Java EE 5 application server. IMHO, if the user wants
EJB 3.1 and JPA 2.0 in G2.x, he/she should provide a plugin for them
instead of upgrading the default EJB 3.0 and JPA 1.0 in the server directly.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> > Thanks, David !
> >
> > Devs and Users, Any more inputs ?
>
> There was the patch submitted that upgraded a number of Geronimo
> dependencies. IIRC, that's never been applied. I assume the major
> dependencies have been upgraded to current service levels (e.g. Tomcat,
> OpenEJB).
>
> The changes in the patch may be more than we'd want in a 2.2.x release.
> I'd like a discussion to make sure that's what we want to do...
>
> --kevan
--
Shawn
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Thanks, David !
>
> Devs and Users, Any more inputs ?
There was the patch submitted that upgraded a number of Geronimo dependencies. IIRC, that's never been applied. I assume the major dependencies have been upgraded to current service levels (e.g. Tomcat, OpenEJB).
The changes in the patch may be more than we'd want in a 2.2.x release. I'd like a discussion to make sure that's what we want to do...
--kevan
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, David !
Devs and Users, Any more inputs ?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in 3.0,
> and these should be ported back to 2.2.x.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from
> me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent
> openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.
>
> But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb
> is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things
> for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we
> might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.
>
> [1]
> http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>
--
Shawn
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
Hi David,
I just took a look at the changes you made in
GERONIMO-6337<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6337>
and GERONIMO-6338 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6338>.
for jaspic. the changes are so huge so that It's very hard to merge it
back to 2.2 without deep jspic knowledge.
Could you please port it back when you have time ? I've added this item
to G2.2.2 release plan[1].
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2.2+Release+Status++--Ongoing
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in 3.0,
> and these should be ported back to 2.2.x.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from
> me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent
> openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.
>
> But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb
> is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things
> for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we
> might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.
>
> [1]
> http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>
--
Shawn
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, David !
Devs and Users, Any more inputs ?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in 3.0,
> and these should be ported back to 2.2.x.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from
> me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent
> openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.
>
> But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb
> is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things
> for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we
> might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.
>
> [1]
> http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>
--
Shawn
Re: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ?
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I recently fixed some of my misinterpretations of the jaspic spec in 3.0, and these should be ported back to 2.2.x.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.
>
> But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.
>
> [1]http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn