You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@superset.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/08/10 06:16:40 UTC
[GitHub] john-bodley commented on issue #5528: [SIP-1] Split the Table
visualization into two visualizations
john-bodley commented on issue #5528: [SIP-1] Split the Table visualization into two visualizations
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/5528#issuecomment-411986407
@mistercrunch we agree that the current table UX is confusing, however we aren’t sure if this is really the long-term solution. The atomic vs. non-atomic issue is systemic to all visualization types, not just to the table. i.e., if you extrapolate this logic, we would have to have two time series charts, two bar charts, etc., to support both atomic tables and aggregated data sources.
It seems like a better solution would be to extend ad-hoc metrics to understand the difference between atomic vs non-atomic, i.e., a metric could be an aggregation on a non-atomic column or merely the value of an atomic column.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@superset.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-help@superset.apache.org