You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@couchdb.apache.org by Aurélien Bénel <au...@utt.fr> on 2018/03/14 14:17:02 UTC

Desperately seeking views ETag

Dear CouchDBers,

A month ago, I finally moved all my applications from CouchDB 1.6.1 to 2.1.1 (in single node mode, for now).
The migration process was surprisingly easy. Thanks for the good work!

However, I noticed terrible performance drops from now and then.
After investigating, I found that it was due to the disappearance of HTTP cache management (ETag & If-None-Match) for views.

I know this a known issue (COUCHDB-2859) but are there any good news about progress on this issue?
Or should I better switch back to 1.6 until the issue is solved?


Regards,

Aurélien

Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Posted by Aurélien Bénel <au...@utt.fr>.
> I've took a look at it over the weekend and it seems to be fixable with an approach Robert Newson suggested on the jira issue. I'm planning to make a pull request with the fix sometime this week.

Great!
Thank you very much for this, Eric. 
I’m looking forward to your fix. 

Have a nice week!

Regards,

Aurélien

Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Posted by Eiri <ei...@eiri.ca>.
Hi Aurélien,

I've took a look at it over the weekend and it seems to be fixable with an approach Robert Newson suggested on the jira issue. I'm planning to make a pull request with the fix sometime this week.


Regards,
Eric


> On Mar 14, 2018, at 11:17, Aurélien Bénel <au...@utt.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear CouchDBers,
> 
> A month ago, I finally moved all my applications from CouchDB 1.6.1 to 2.1.1 (in single node mode, for now).
> The migration process was surprisingly easy. Thanks for the good work!
> 
> However, I noticed terrible performance drops from now and then.
> After investigating, I found that it was due to the disappearance of HTTP cache management (ETag & If-None-Match) for views.
> 
> I know this a known issue (COUCHDB-2859) but are there any good news about progress on this issue?
> Or should I better switch back to 1.6 until the issue is solved?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Aurélien

Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Posted by Aurélien Bénel <au...@utt.fr>.
> You can follow the progress here:

Great! Thank you Eiri, thank you Joan.


Regards,

Aurélien

Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Posted by Joan Touzet <wo...@apache.org>.
You can follow the progress here:

https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1237

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aurélien Bénel" <au...@utt.fr>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Cc: "Eiri" <ei...@eiri.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 12:21:25 PM
Subject: Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Evening folks, evening Eiri,

>> I know this a known issue (COUCHDB-2859) but are there any good news about progress on this issue?
>> Or should I better switch back to 1.6 until the issue is solved?
> I've took a look at it over the weekend and it seems to be fixable with an approach Robert Newson suggested on the jira issue. I'm planning to make a pull request with the fix sometime this week.

Any news about COUCHDB-2859 resolution?


Regards,

Aurélien

Re: Desperately seeking views ETag

Posted by Aurélien Bénel <au...@utt.fr>.
Evening folks, evening Eiri,

>> I know this a known issue (COUCHDB-2859) but are there any good news about progress on this issue?
>> Or should I better switch back to 1.6 until the issue is solved?
> I've took a look at it over the weekend and it seems to be fixable with an approach Robert Newson suggested on the jira issue. I'm planning to make a pull request with the fix sometime this week.

Any news about COUCHDB-2859 resolution?


Regards,

Aurélien