You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz> on 2005/11/22 07:33:32 UTC
Tearing my hair out...
<FONT size=2>
<P>I then found that the front end javascript blows up when the "field in error", using front end "required" validation, is hidden and the javascript is trying to put the cursor in it... as it's required.</P>
<P>So, I have to put "." into each "required" field before I hide it IF and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else in it... and if I show the field I have to remove the "." IF and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else it...</P>
<P>A lot of javascript to get round the validator...</P>
<P>Please can you ensure that the "final" validator for 4.0 is "Struts" like and can handle "depends on" validation... so a mandatory field can be specified as mandatory ONLY if the pre-condition is met (i.e. a previous check box was selected).</P>
<P>Please</P>
<P>:)</P>
<P>P.s. I suppose I should really just unwire the validator for now if I want to use hidden fields.</P></FONT>
Re: Tearing my hair out...
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Hehehe...I might do better than that next week ;)
On 11/22/05, Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz> wrote:
> Done...
>
> Vote for TAPESTRY-772
>
> :)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:jkuhnert@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 1:37 a.m.
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: Tearing my hair out...
> >
> > Could you post this to JIRA with some very detailed
> > requirements/possibly a sample use-case? I'd like to see something
> > along these lines as well.
> >
> > jesse
> > On 11/22/05, Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz> wrote:
> > > <FONT size=2>
> > > <P>I then found that the front end javascript blows up when the "field
> > in error", using front end "required" validation, is hidden and the
> > javascript is trying to put the cursor in it... as it's required.</P>
> > > <P>So, I have to put "." into each "required" field before I hide it IF
> > and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else in it... and if I show the
> > field I have to remove the "." IF and ONLY IF the user has not put
> > anything else it...</P>
> > > <P>A lot of javascript to get round the validator...</P>
> > > <P>Please can you ensure that the "final" validator for 4.0 is "Struts"
> > like and can handle "depends on" validation... so a mandatory field can be
> > specified as mandatory ONLY if the pre-condition is met (i.e. a previous
> > check box was selected).</P>
> > > <P>Please</P>
> > > <P>:)</P>
> > > <P>P.s. I suppose I should really just unwire the validator for now if I
> > want to use hidden fields.</P></FONT>
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 20/11/2005
> >
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.5/177 - Release Date: 21/11/2005
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: Tearing my hair out...
Posted by Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz>.
Done...
Vote for TAPESTRY-772
:)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:jkuhnert@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 1:37 a.m.
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Tearing my hair out...
>
> Could you post this to JIRA with some very detailed
> requirements/possibly a sample use-case? I'd like to see something
> along these lines as well.
>
> jesse
> On 11/22/05, Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz> wrote:
> > <FONT size=2>
> > <P>I then found that the front end javascript blows up when the "field
> in error", using front end "required" validation, is hidden and the
> javascript is trying to put the cursor in it... as it's required.</P>
> > <P>So, I have to put "." into each "required" field before I hide it IF
> and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else in it... and if I show the
> field I have to remove the "." IF and ONLY IF the user has not put
> anything else it...</P>
> > <P>A lot of javascript to get round the validator...</P>
> > <P>Please can you ensure that the "final" validator for 4.0 is "Struts"
> like and can handle "depends on" validation... so a mandatory field can be
> specified as mandatory ONLY if the pre-condition is met (i.e. a previous
> check box was selected).</P>
> > <P>Please</P>
> > <P>:)</P>
> > <P>P.s. I suppose I should really just unwire the validator for now if I
> want to use hidden fields.</P></FONT>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 20/11/2005
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.5/177 - Release Date: 21/11/2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Tearing my hair out...
Posted by Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>.
Could you post this to JIRA with some very detailed
requirements/possibly a sample use-case? I'd like to see something
along these lines as well.
jesse
On 11/22/05, Tony Herstell <to...@cambridgesoftware.co.nz> wrote:
> <FONT size=2>
> <P>I then found that the front end javascript blows up when the "field in error", using front end "required" validation, is hidden and the javascript is trying to put the cursor in it... as it's required.</P>
> <P>So, I have to put "." into each "required" field before I hide it IF and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else in it... and if I show the field I have to remove the "." IF and ONLY IF the user has not put anything else it...</P>
> <P>A lot of javascript to get round the validator...</P>
> <P>Please can you ensure that the "final" validator for 4.0 is "Struts" like and can handle "depends on" validation... so a mandatory field can be specified as mandatory ONLY if the pre-condition is met (i.e. a previous check box was selected).</P>
> <P>Please</P>
> <P>:)</P>
> <P>P.s. I suppose I should really just unwire the validator for now if I want to use hidden fields.</P></FONT>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org