You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Maximilian Michels (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/08 16:00:35 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-1789) Allow adding of URLs to the usercode class loader

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Maximilian Michels closed FLINK-1789.
-------------------------------------
       Resolution: Implemented
    Fix Version/s: 0.10

> Allow adding of URLs to the usercode class loader
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1789
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Runtime
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Assignee: Timo Walther
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>
> Currently, there is no option to add customs classpath URLs to the FlinkUserCodeClassLoader. JARs always need to be shipped to the cluster even if they are already present on all nodes.
> It would be great if RemoteEnvironment also accepts valid classpaths URLs and forwards them to BlobLibraryCacheManager.
> The problem with the current approach is that the code loaded by the regular JVM class loader cannot refer to job specific types (which can be accessed only at the UserCodeClassLoader level). Unfortunately, this is the case if we use the classpath entry to generate the dataflows dynamically at runtime.
> Currently this functionality needs to be done by "hacks" (hardcode a filesystem path next to the list of jars when initializing the BlobManager entry). It makes sense to open an issue which makes this list parameterizable via an additional ExecutionEnvironment argument (this is basically the only main feature which prohibits the use of Emma project with "off-the-shelf" Flink).
> This, of course, would require that the folders are shared (e.g. via NFS) between client, master and workers. I think what made Stephan so excited is the idea of using the same URL mechanism in order to ship the code to all dependent parties (most probably by running a dedicated HTTP or FTP server on the client).
> We make the following assumptions for the use case where we need the global class path:
> - The URL is either a file path that points to a directory accessible to all nodes (NFS or so) and the client runs in the cluster as well.
> - The URL is an HTTP URL or so that points to a file server that serves the classes to work in non-shared directory settings.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)