You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@trafficserver.apache.org by jp...@apache.org on 2014/12/10 22:35:53 UTC
[2/3] trafficserver git commit: docs: update focused on architecture
documentation
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/blob/aa37d0ab/doc/arch/cache/cache-arch.en.rst
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/doc/arch/cache/cache-arch.en.rst b/doc/arch/cache/cache-arch.en.rst
index 78764d7..fecd0fb 100644
--- a/doc/arch/cache/cache-arch.en.rst
+++ b/doc/arch/cache/cache-arch.en.rst
@@ -23,81 +23,99 @@ Cache Architecture
Introduction
~~~~~~~~~~~~
-In addition to an HTTP proxy, |ATS| is also an HTTP cache. |TS| can cache any octet stream although it currently
-supports only those octet streams delivered by the HTTP protocol. When such a stream is cached (along with the HTTP
-protocol headers) it is termed an :term:`object <cache object>` in the cache. Each object is identified by a globally
-unique value called a :term:`cache key`.
-
-The purpose of this document is to describe the basic structure and implementation details of the |TS| cache.
-Configuration of the cache will be discussed only to the extent needed to understand the internal mechanisms. This
-document will be useful primarily to |TS| developers working on the |TS| codebase or plugins for |TS|. It is assumed the
-reader is already familiar with the :ref:`admin-guide` and specifically with :ref:`http-proxy-caching` and
-:ref:`configuring-the-cache` along with the associated configuration files and values.
-
-Unfortunately the internal terminology is not particularly consistent so this document will frequently use terms in
-different ways than they are used in the code in an attempt to create some consistency.
+In addition to being an HTTP proxy, |ATS| is also an HTTP cache. |TS| can cache
+any octet stream, although it currently supports only those octet streams
+delivered by the HTTP protocol. When such a stream is cached (along with the
+HTTP protocol headers) it is termed an :term:`object <cache object>` in the
+cache. Each object is identified by a globally unique value called a
+:term:`cache key`.
+
+The purpose of this document is to describe the basic structure and
+implementation details of the |TS| cache. Configuration of the cache will be
+discussed only to the extent needed to understand the internal mechanisms. This
+document will be useful primarily to |TS| developers working on the |TS|
+codebase or plugins for |TS|. It is assumed the reader is already familiar with
+the :ref:`admin-guide` and specifically with :ref:`http-proxy-caching` and
+:ref:`configuring-the-cache` along with the associated configuration files and
+values.
+
+Unfortunately, the internal terminology is not particularly consistent, so this
+document will frequently use terms in different ways than they are used in the
+code in an attempt to create some consistency.
Cache Layout
~~~~~~~~~~~~
-The following sections describe how persistent cache data is structured. |TS| treats its persisent storage an
-undifferentiated collection of bytes, assuming no other structure to it. In particular it does not use the file system
-of the host operating system. If a file is used it is used only to mark out the set of bytes to be used.
+The following sections describe how persistent cache data is structured. |TS|
+treats its persisent storage as an undifferentiated collection of bytes,
+assuming no other structure to it. In particular, it does not use the file
+system of the host operating system. If a file is used it is used only to mark
+out the set of bytes to be used.
Cache storage
=============
-The raw storage for the |TS| cache is configured in :file:`storage.config`. Each line in the file defines a :term:`cache
-span` which is treated as a uniform persistent store.
+The raw storage for the |TS| cache is configured in :file:`storage.config`. Each
+line in the file defines a :term:`cache span` which is treated as a uniform
+persistent store.
.. figure:: images/cache-spans.png
:align: center
Two cache spans
-This storage organized in to a set of :term:`cache volume`\ s which are defined in :file:`volume.config` for the
-purposes of the administrator. These are the units that used for all other administator level configuration.
+This storage organized into a set of :term:`cache volumes <cache volume>` which
+are defined in :file:`volume.config`. These are the units that are used for all
+other administator level configuration.
-Cache volumes can be defined by a percentage of the total storage or an absolute amount of storage. By default each
-cache volume is spread across all of the cache spans for robustness. The intersection of a cache volume and a cache span
-is a :term:`cache stripe`. Each cache span is divided in to cache stripes and each cache volume is a collection of those
-stripes.
+Cache volumes can be defined by a percentage of the total storage or as an
+absolute amount of storage. By default, each cache volume is spread across all
+of the cache spans for robustness. The intersection of a cache volume and a
+cache span is a :term:`cache stripe`. Each cache span is divided into cache
+stripes and each cache volume is a collection of those stripes.
-If the cache volumes for the example cache spans were defined as
+If the cache volumes for the example cache spans were defined as:
.. image:: images/ats-cache-volume-definition.png
:align: center
-then the actual layout would look like
+Then the actual layout would look like:
.. image:: images/cache-span-layout.png
:align: center
-Cache stripes are the fundamental unit of cache for the implementation. A cached object is stored entirely in a single
-stripe, and therefore in a single cache span - objects are never split across cache spans or volumes. Objects are
-assigned to a stripe (and hence to a cache volume) automatically based on a hash of the URI used to retrieve the object
-from the origin server. It is possible to configure this to a limited extent in :file:`hosting.config` which supports
-content from specific host or domain to be stored on specific cache volumes. In addition, as of version 4.0.1 it is
-possible to control which cache spans (and hence, which cache stripes) are contained in a specific cache volume.
-
-The layout and structure of the cache spans, the cache volumes, and the cache stripes that compose them are derived
-entirely from the :file:`storage.config` and :file:`cache.config` and is recomputed from scratch when the
-:program:`traffic_server` is started. Therefore any change to those files can (and almost always will) invalidate the
-existing cache in its entirety.
+Cache stripes are the fundamental unit of cache for the implementation. A
+cached object is stored entirely in a single stripe, and therefore in a single
+cache span. Objects are never split across cache spans or volumes. Objects are
+assigned to a stripe (and in turn to a cache volume) automatically based on a
+hash of the URI used to retrieve the object from the :term:`origin server`. It
+is possible to configure this to a limited extent in :file:`hosting.config`,
+which supports content from specific hosts or domain to be stored on specific
+cache volumes. As of version 4.0.1 it is also possible to control which cache
+spans (and hence, which cache stripes) are contained in a specific cache volume.
+
+The layout and structure of the cache spans, the cache volumes, and the cache
+stripes that compose them are derived entirely from :file:`storage.config` and
+:file:`cache.config` and is recomputed from scratch when the
+:program:`traffic_server` is started. Therefore, any change to those files can
+(and almost always will) invalidate the existing cache in its entirety.
Stripe Structure
================
-|TS| treats the storage associated with a cache stripe as an undifferentiated span of bytes. Internally each stripe is
-treated almost entirely independently. The data structures described in this section are duplicated for each stripe.
-Internally the term "volume" is used for these stripes and implemented primarily in :cpp:class:`Vol`. What a user thinks
-of as a volume (what this document calls a "cache volume") is represented by :cpp:class:`CacheVol`.
+|TS| treats the storage associated with a cache stripe as an undifferentiated
+span of bytes. Internally each stripe is treated almost entirely independently.
+The data structures described in this section are duplicated for each stripe.
+Internally the term *volume* is used for these stripes and implemented primarily
+in :cpp:class:`Vol`. What a user thinks of as a volume (and what this document
+calls a *cache volume*) is represented by :cpp:class:`CacheVol`.
.. note::
- Stripe assignment must be done before working with an object because the directory is local to the stripe. Any cached
- objects for which the stripe assignment is changed are effectively lost as their directory data will not be found in
- the new stripe.
+ Stripe assignment must be done before working with an object because the
+ directory is local to the stripe. Any cached objects for which the stripe
+ assignment is changed are effectively lost as their directory data will not
+ be found in the new stripe.
.. index:: cache directory
.. _cache-directory:
@@ -111,102 +129,129 @@ Cache Directory
.. _fragment:
-Content in a stripe is tracked via a directory. We call each element of the directory a "directory entry" and each is
-represented by :cpp:class:`Dir`. Each entry refers to a chunk of contiguous storage in the cache. These are referred to
-variously as "fragments", "segments", "docs" / "documents", and a few other things. This document will use the term
-"fragment" as that is the most common reference in the code. The term "Doc" (for :cpp:class:`Doc`) will be used to refer
-to the header data for a fragment. Overall the directory is treated as a hash with the :term:`cache ID` as the key. See
-:ref:`directory probing <cache-directory-probe>` for how the cache ID is used to locate a directory entry. The cache ID
-is in turn computed from a :term:`cache key` which by default is the URL of the content.
-
-The directory is used as a memory resident structure which means a directory entry is as small as possible (currently 10
-bytes). This forces some compromises on the data that can be stored there. On the other hand this means that most cache
-misses do not require disk I/O which has a large performance benefit.
-
-An additional point is the directory is always fully sized. Once a stripe is initialized the directory size is
-fixed and never changed. This size is related (roughly linearly) to the size of the stripe. It is for this reason the
-memory footprint of |TS| depends strongly on the size of the disk cache. Because the directory size does not change,
-neither does this memory requirement so |TS| does not consume more memory as more content is stored in the cache. If
-there is enough memory to run |TS| with an empty cache there is enough to run it with a full cache.
+Content in a stripe is tracked via a directory. Each element of the directory
+is a :term:`directory entry` and is represented by :cpp:class:`Dir`. Each entry
+refers to a chunk of contiguous storage in the cache. These are referred to
+variously as *fragments*, *segments*, *docs*, *documents*, and a few other
+things. This document will use the term *fragment* as that is the most common
+reference in the code. The term *Doc* (for :cpp:class:`Doc`) will be used to
+refer to the header data for a fragment. Overall, the directory is treated as a
+hash with the :term:`cache ID` as the key. See
+:ref:`directory probing <cache-directory-probe>` for how the cache ID is used
+to locate a directory entry. The cache ID is in turn computed from a
+:term:`cache key` which by default is the URL of the content.
+
+The directory is used as a memory resident structure, which means a directory
+entry is as small as possible (currently 10 bytes). This forces some
+compromises on the data that can be stored there. On the other hand this means
+that most cache misses do not require disk I/O, which has a large performance
+benefit.
+
+The directory is always fully sized; once a stripe is initialized the directory
+size is fixed and never changed. This size is related (roughly linearly) to the
+size of the stripe. It is for this reason the memory footprint of |TS| depends
+strongly on the size of the disk cache. Because the directory size does not
+change, neither does this memory requirement, so |TS| does not consume more
+memory as more content is stored in the cache. If there is enough memory to run
+|TS| with an empty cache there is enough to run it with a full cache.
.. figure:: images/cache-directory-structure.png
:align: center
-Each entry stores an offset in the stripe and a size. The size stored in the directory entry is an :ref:`approximate
-size <dir-size>` which is at least as big as the actual data in the fragment. Exact size data is stored in the fragment
-header on disk.
+Each entry stores an offset in the stripe and a size. The size stored in the
+directory entry is an :ref:`approximate size <dir-size>` which is at least as
+big as the actual data in the fragment. Exact size data is stored in the
+fragment header on disk.
.. note::
- Data in HTTP headers cannot be examined without disk I/O. This includes the original URL for the object. The cache
- key is not stored explicitly and therefore cannot be reliably retrieved.
+ Data in HTTP headers cannot be examined without disk I/O. This includes the
+ original URL for the object. The cache key is not stored explicitly and
+ therefore cannot be reliably retrieved.
The directory is a hash table that uses `chaining
-<http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Data_Structures/Hash_Tables#Collision_resolution>`_ for collision resolution. Because each
-entry is small they are used directly as the list header of the hash bucket.
+<http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Data_Structures/Hash_Tables#Collision_resolution>`_
+for collision resolution. Because each entry is small they are used directly as
+the list header of the hash bucket.
.. _dir-segment:
.. _dir-bucket:
-Chaining is implemented by imposing grouping structures on the entries in a directory. The first level grouping is a
-:term:`directory bucket`. This is a fixed number (currently 4 - defined as ``DIR_DEPTH``) of entries. This
-serves to define the basic hash buckets with the first entry in each cache bucket serving as the root of the hash
-bucket.
+Chaining is implemented by imposing grouping structures on the entries in a
+directory. The first level grouping is a :term:`directory bucket`. This is a
+fixed number (currently 4, defined as ``DIR_DEPTH``) of entries. This serves to
+define the basic hash buckets with the first entry in each cache bucket serving
+as the root of the hash bucket.
.. note::
- The term "bucket" is used in the code to mean both the conceptual bucket for hashing and for a structural grouping
- mechanism in the directory and so these will be qualified as needed to distinguish them. The unqualified term
- "bucket" is almost always used to mean the structural grouping in the directory.
+ The term *bucket* is used in the code to mean both the conceptual bucket for
+ hashing and for a structural grouping mechanism in the directory. These will
+ be qualified as needed to distinguish them. The unqualified term *bucket* is
+ almost always used to mean the structural grouping in the directory.
-Directory buckets are grouped in to :term:`segments <directory segment>`. All segments in a stripe have the same number of
-buckets. The number of segments in a stripe is chosen so that each segment has as many buckets as possible without
-exceeding 65535 (2\ :sup:`16`\ -1) entries in a segment.
+Directory buckets are grouped in to :term:`segments <directory segment>`. All
+segments in a stripe have the same number of buckets. The number of segments in
+a stripe is chosen so that each segment has as many buckets as possible without
+exceeding 65,535 (2\ :sup:`16`\ -1) entries in a segment.
.. figure:: images/dir-segment-bucket.png
:align: center
-Each directory entry has a previous and next index value which is used to link entries in the same segment. Because no
-segment has more than 65535 entries 16 bits suffices for storing the index values. The stripe header contains an array
-of entry indices which are used as the roots of entry free lists, one for each segment. Active entries are stored via
-the bucket structure. When a stripe is initialized the first entry in each bucket is zeroed (marked unused) and all
-other entries are put in the corresponding segment free list in the stripe header. This means the first entry of each
-directory bucket is used as the root of a hash bucket and is therefore marked unused rather than being put a free list.
-The other entries in the directory bucket are preferentially preferred for adding to the corresponding hash bucket but
-this is not required. The segment free lists are initialized such that the extra bucket entries are added in order - all
-the seconds, then the thirds, then the fourths. Because the free lists are FIFOs this means extra entries will be
-selected from the fourth entries across all the buckets first, then the thirds, etc. When allocating a new directory
-entry in a bucket the entries are searched from first to last, which maximizes bucket locality (that is, cache IDs that
-map to the same hash bucket will also tend to use the same directory bucket).
+Each directory entry has a previous and next index value which is used to link
+entries in the same segment. Because no segment has more than 65,535 entries,
+16 bits suffices for storing the index values. The stripe header contains an
+array of entry indices which are used as the roots of entry free lists, one for
+each segment. Active entries are stored via the bucket structure. When a stripe
+is initialized the first entry in each bucket is zeroed (marked unused) and all
+other entries are put in the corresponding segment free list in the stripe
+header. This means the first entry of each :term:`directory bucket` is used as
+the root of a hash bucket and is therefore marked unused rather than being put
+a free list. The other entries in the directory bucket are preferred for adding
+to the corresponding hash bucket but this is not required. The segment free
+lists are initialized such that the extra bucket entries are added in order;
+all the seconds, then the thirds, then the fourths. Because the free lists are
+FIFOs, this means extra entries will be selected from the fourth entries across
+all the buckets first, then the thirds, etc. When allocating a new directory
+entry in a bucket the entries are searched from first to last, which maximizes
+bucket locality (that is, :term:`cache IDs <cache ID>` that map to the same
+hash bucket will also tend to use the same directory bucket).
.. figure:: images/dir-bucket-assign.png
:align: center
-Entries are removed from the free list when used and returned when no longer in use. When a fragment needs to be put in
-to the directory the cache ID is used to locate a hash bucket (which also determines the segment and directory bucket).
-If the first entry in the directory bucket is marked unused, it is used. If not then the other entries in the bucket are
-searched and if any are on the free list, that entry is used. If none are available then the first entry on the segment
-free list is used. This entry is attached to the hash bucket via the same next and previous indices used for the free
-list so that it can be found when doing a lookup of a cache ID.
+Entries are removed from the free list when used and returned when no longer in
+use. When a :term:`fragment <cache fragment>` needs to be put in to the
+directory the cache ID is used to locate a hash bucket (which also determines
+the segment and directory bucket). If the first entry in the directory bucket
+is marked unused, it is used. Otherwise, the other entries in the bucket are
+searched and if any are on the free list, that entry is used. If none are
+available then the first entry on the segment free list is used. This entry is
+attached to the hash bucket via the same next and previous indices used for the
+free list so that it can be found when doing a lookup of a cache ID.
Storage Layout
--------------
-The storage layout is the stripe metadata followed by cached content. The metadata consists of three parts - the stripe
-header, the directory, and the stripe footer. The metadata is stored twice. The header and the footer are instances of
-:cpp:class:`VolHeaderFooter`. This is a stub structure which can have a trailing variable sized array. This array is
-used as the segment free list roots in the directory. Each contains the segment index of the first element of the free
-list for the segment. The footer is a copy of the header without the segment free lists. This makes the size of the
-header dependent on the directory but not that of the footer.
+The storage layout is the stripe metadata followed by cached content. The
+metadata consists of three parts: the stripe header, the directory, and the
+stripe footer. The metadata is stored twice. The header and the footer are
+instances of :cpp:class:`VolHeaderFooter`. This is a stub structure which can
+have a trailing variable sized array. This array is used as the segment free
+list roots in the directory. Each contains the segment index of the first
+element of the free list for the segment. The footer is a copy of the header
+without the segment free lists. This makes the size of the header dependent on
+the directory but not that of the footer.
.. figure:: images/cache-stripe-layout.png
:align: center
-Each stripe has several values that describe its basic layout.
+Each stripe has several values that describe its basic layout:
skip
- The start of stripe data. This represents either space reserved at the start of a physical device to avoid problems
- with the host operating system, or an offset representing use of space in the cache span by other stripes.
+ The start of stripe data. This represents either space reserved at the start
+ of a physical device to avoid problems with the host operating system, or an
+ offset representing use of space in the cache span by other stripes.
start
The offset for the start of the content, after the stripe metadata.
@@ -215,25 +260,35 @@ length
Total number of bytes in the stripe. :cpp:member:`Vol::len`.
data length
- Total number of blocks in the stripe available for content storage. :cpp:member:`Vol::data_blocks`.
+ Total number of blocks in the stripe available for content storage.
+ :cpp:member:`Vol::data_blocks`.
+
+.. note::
-.. note:: Great care must be taken with sizes and lengths in the cache code because there are at least three different metrics (bytes, cache blocks, store blocks) used in various places.
+ Great care must be taken with sizes and lengths in the cache code because
+ there are at least three different metrics (bytes, cache blocks, store
+ blocks) used in various places.
-The total size of the directory (the number of entries) is computed by taking the size of the stripe and dividing by the
-average object size. The directory always consumes this amount of memory which has the effect that if cache size is
-increased so is the memory requirement for |TS|. The average object size defaults to 8000 bytes but can be configured
-using :ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.min_average_object_size`. Increasing the average object size will reduce the memory
-footprint of the directory at the expense of reducing the number of distinct objects that can be stored in the cache
-[#]_.
+The total size of the directory (the number of :term:`entries <directory entry>`)
+is computed by taking the size of the :term:`cache stripe` and dividing by the
+average object size. The directory always consumes this amount of memory which
+has the effect that if cache size is increased so is the memory requirement for
+|TS|. The average object size defaults to 8000 bytes but can be configured using
+:ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.min_average_object_size`. Increasing the average
+object size will reduce the memory footprint of the directory at the expense of
+reducing the number of distinct objects that can be stored in the cache.
.. index: write cursor
.. _write-cursor:
-The content area stores the actual objects and is used as a circular buffer where new objects overwrite the least
-recently cached objects. The location in a stripe where new cache data is written is called the *write cursor*. This
-means that objects can be de facto evicted from cache even if they have not expired if the data is overwritten by the
-write cursor. If an object is overwritten this is not detected at that time and the directory is not updated. Instead it
-will be noted if the object is accessed in the future and the disk read of the fragment fails.
+The content area stores the actual objects and is used as a circular buffer
+where new objects overwrite the least recently cached objects. The location in
+a stripe where new cache data is written is called the *write cursor*. This
+means that objects can be de facto evicted from cache even if they have not
+expired if the data is overwritten by the write cursor. If an object is
+overwritten this is not detected at that time and the directory is not updated.
+Instead it will be noted if the object is accessed in the future and the disk
+read of the fragment fails.
.. figure:: images/ats-cache-write-cursor.png
:align: center
@@ -242,91 +297,116 @@ will be noted if the object is accessed in the future and the disk read of the f
.. note:: Cache data on disk is never updated.
-This is a key thing to keep in mind. What appear to be updates (such as doing a refresh on stale content and getting
-back a 304) are actually new copies of data being written at the write cursor. The originals are left as "dead" space
-which will be consumed when the write cursor arrives at that disk location. Once the stripe directory is updated (in
-memory!) the original fragment in the cache is effectively destroyed. This is the general space management techinque
-used in other cases as well. If an object needs to removed from cache, only the directory needs to be changed. No other
-work (and *particularly* no disk I/O) needs to be done.
+This is a key thing to keep in mind. What appear to be updates (such as doing a
+refresh on :term:`stale` content and getting back a 304) are actually new
+copies of data being written at the write cursor. The originals are left as
+"dead" space which will be consumed when the write cursor arrives at that disk
+location. Once the stripe directory is updated (in memory) the original
+fragment in the cache is effectively destroyed. This is the general space
+management technique used in other cases as well. If an object needs to removed
+from cache, only the directory needs to be changed. No other work (and
+particularly, no disk I/O) needs to be done.
Object Structure
================
-Objects are stored as two types of data, metadata and content data. Metadata is all the data about the object and the
-content and includes the HTTP headers. The content data is the content of the object, the octet stream delivered to the
-client as the object.
-
-Objects are rooted in a :cpp:class:`Doc` structure stored in the cache. :cpp:class:`Doc` serves as the header data for a
-fragment and is contained at the start of every fragment. The first fragment for an object is termed the "first ``Doc``"
-and always contains the object metadata. Any operation on the object will read this fragment first. The fragment is
-located by converting the cache key for the object to a cache ID and then doing a lookup for a directory entry with that
-key. The directory entry has the offset and approximate size of the first fragment which is then read from the disk.
-This fragment will contain the request header and response along with overall object properties (such as content
-length).
+Objects are stored as two types of data: metadata and content data. Metadata is
+all the data about the object and the content and includes the HTTP headers.
+The content data is the content of the object, the octet stream delivered to
+the client as the object.
+
+Objects are rooted in a :cpp:class:`Doc` structure stored in the cache.
+:cpp:class:`Doc` serves as the header data for a :term:`cache fragment` and is
+contained at the start of every fragment. The first fragment for an object is
+termed the *first Doc* and always contains the object metadata. Any
+operation on the object will read this fragment first. The fragment is located
+by converting the :term:`cache key` for the object to a :term:`cache ID` and
+then doing a lookup for a :term:`directory entry` with that key. The directory
+entry has the offset and approximate size of the first fragment which is then
+read from the disk. This fragment will contain the request header and response
+along with overall object properties (such as content length).
.. index:: alternate
-|TS| supports `varying content <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.44>`_ for objects. These
-are called *alternates*. All metadata for all alternates is stored in the first fragment including the set of alternates
+|TS| supports `varying content <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.44>`_
+for objects. These are called :term:`alternates <alternate>`. All metadata for
+all alternates is stored in the first fragment including the set of alternates
and the HTTP headers for them. This enables `alternate selection
-<http://trafficserver.apache.org/docs/trunk/sdk/http-hooks-and-transactions/http-alternate-selection.en.html>`_ to be
-done after the first ``Doc`` is read from disk. An object that has more than one alternate will have the alternate
-content stored separately from the first fragment. For objects with only one alternate the content may or may not be in
-the same (first) fragment as the metadata. Each separate alternate content is allocated a directory entry and the key
-for that entry is stored in the first fragment metadata.
-
-Prior to version 4.0.1 the header data was stored in the :cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector` class which was marshaled to a
-variable length area of the on disk image, followed by information about additional fragments if needed to store the
-object.
+<http://trafficserver.apache.org/docs/trunk/sdk/http-hooks-and-transactions/http-alternate-selection.en.html>`_
+to be done after the *first Doc* is read from disk. An object that has more than
+one alternate will have the alternate content stored separately from the first
+fragment. For objects with only one alternate the content may or may not be in
+the same (first) fragment as the metadata. Each separate alternate content is
+allocated a directory entry and the key for that entry is stored in the first
+fragment metadata.
+
+Prior to version 4.0.1, the header data was stored in the
+:cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector` class which was marshaled to a variable length
+area of the on disk image, followed by information about additional fragments
+if needed to store the object.
.. figure:: images/cache-doc-layout-3-2-0.png
:align: center
``Doc`` layout 3.2.0
-This had the problem that with only one fragment table it could not be reliable for objects with more than one alternate
-[#]_. Therefore the fragment data was moved from being a separate variable length section of the metadata to being
-directly incorporated in to the :cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector`, yielding a layout of the following form.
+This had the problem that with only one fragment table it could not be reliable
+for objects with more than one alternate[#multiple-alternates]_. Therefore, the
+fragment data was moved from being a separate variable length section of the
+metadata to being directly incorporated in to the :cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector`,
+yielding a layout of the following form.
.. figure:: images/cache-doc-layout-4-0-1.png
:align: center
``Doc`` layout 4.0.1
-Each element in the vector contains for each alternate, in addition to the HTTP headers and the fragment table (if any),
-a cache key. This cache key identifies a directory entry that is referred to as the "earliest ``Doc``". This is the
-location where the content for the alternate begins.
+Each element in the vector contains for each alternate, in addition to the HTTP
+headers and the fragment table (if any), a :term:`cache key`. This cache key
+identifies a :term:`directory entry` that is referred to as the *earliest Doc*.
+This is the location where the content for the alternate begins.
-When the object is first cached, it will have a single alternate and that will be stored (if not too large) in first
-``Doc``. This is termed a *resident alternate* in the code. This can only happen on the initial store of the object. If
-the metadata is updated (such as a ``304`` response to an ``If-Modified-Since`` request) then unless the object is
-small, the object data will be left in the original fragment and a new fragment written as the first fragment, making
-the alternate non-resident. "Small" is defined as a length smaller than :ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.alt_rewrite_max_size`.
+When the object is first cached, it will have a single alternate and that will
+be stored (if not too large) in first ``Doc``. This is termed a *resident alternate*
+in the code. This can only happen on the initial store of the object. If the
+metadata is updated (such as a ``304`` response to an ``If-Modified-Since``
+request) then unless the object is small, the object data will be left in the
+original fragment and a new fragment written as the first fragment, making the
+alternate non-resident. *Small* is defined as a length smaller than
+:ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.alt_rewrite_max_size`.
.. note::
- The :cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector` is stored only in the first ``Doc``. Subsequent ``Doc`` instances for the
- object, including the earliest ``Doc``, should have an ``hlen`` of zero and if not, it is ignored.
-
-Large objects are split in to multiple fragments when written to the cache. This is indicated by a total document length
-that is longer than the content in first ``Doc`` or an earliest ``Doc``. In such a case a fragment offset table is
-stored. This contains the byte offset in the object content of the first byte of content data for each fragment past the
-first (as the offset for the first is always zero). This allows range requests to be serviced much more efficiently for
-large objects, as intermediate fragments that do not contain data in the range can be skipped. The last fragment in the
-sequence is detected by the fragment size and offset reaching the end of the total size of the object, there is no
-explicit end mark. Each fragment is computationally chained from the previous in that the cache key for fragment N is
-computed by::
+ The :cpp:class:`CacheHTTPInfoVector` is stored only in the first ``Doc``.
+ Subsequent ``Doc`` instances for the object, including the earliest ``Doc``,
+ should have an ``hlen`` of zero and if not, it is ignored.
+
+Large objects are split in to multiple fragments when written to the cache. This
+is indicated by a total document length that is longer than the content in
+first ``Doc`` or an earliest ``Doc``. In such a case a fragment offset table is
+stored. This contains the byte offset in the object content of the first byte
+of content data for each fragment past the first (as the offset for the first
+is always zero). This allows range requests to be serviced much more
+efficiently for large objects, as intermediate fragments that do not contain
+data in the range can be skipped. The last fragment in the sequence is detected
+by the fragment size and offset reaching the end of the total size of the
+object, there is no explicit end mark. Each fragment is computationally chained
+from the previous in that the cache key for fragment N is computed by::
key_for_N_plus_one = next_key(key_for_N);
-where ``next_key`` is a global function that deterministically computes a new cache key from an existing cache key.
+Where ``next_key`` is a global function that deterministically computes a new
+cache key from an existing cache key.
-Objects with multiple fragments are laid out such that the data fragments (including the earliest ``Doc``) are written
-first and the first ``Doc`` is written last. When read from disk, both the first and earliest ``Doc`` are validated
-(tested to ensure that they haven't been overwritten by the write cursor) to verify that the entire document is present
-on disk (as they bookend the other fragments - the write cursor cannot overwrite them without overwriting at leastone of
-the verified ``Doc`` instances). Note that while the fragments of a single object are ordered they are not necessarily
-contiguous as data from different objects are interleaved as the data arrives in |TS|.
+Objects with multiple fragments are laid out such that the data fragments
+(including the earliest ``Doc``) are written first and the first ``Doc`` is
+written last. When read from disk, both the first and earliest ``Doc`` are
+validated (tested to ensure that they haven't been overwritten by the write
+cursor) to verify that the entire document is present on disk (as they bookend
+the other fragments - the write cursor cannot overwrite them without overwriting
+at least one of the verified ``Doc`` instances). Note that while the fragments
+of a single object are ordered they are not necessarily contiguous, as data from
+different objects are interleaved as the data arrives in |TS|.
.. figure:: images/cache-multi-fragment.png
:align: center
@@ -335,18 +415,22 @@ contiguous as data from different objects are interleaved as the data arrives in
.. index:: pinned
-Documents which are "pinned" into the cache must not be overwritten so they are "evacuated" from in front of the write
-cursor. Each fragment is read and rewritten. There is a special lookup mechanism for objects that are being evacuated so
-that they can be found in memory rather than the potentially unreliable disk regions. The cache scans ahead of the write
-cursor to discover pinned objects as there is a dead zone immediately before the write cursor from which data cannot be
-evacuated. Evacuated data is read from disk and placed in the write queue and written as its turn comes up.
+Documents which are pinned into the cache must not be overwritten so they are
+evacuated from in front of the write cursor. Each fragment is read and
+rewritten. There is a special lookup mechanism for objects that are being
+evacuated so that they can be found in memory rather than the potentially
+unreliable disk regions. The cache scans ahead of the write cursor to discover
+pinned objects as there is a dead zone immediately before the write cursor from
+which data cannot be evacuated. Evacuated data is read from disk and placed in
+the write queue and written as its turn comes up.
-It appears that objects can only be pinned via the :file:`cache.config` file and if the
-:ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.permit.pinning` is set to non-zero (it is zero by default). Objects which are in use when the
-write cursor is near use the same underlying evacuation mechanism but are handled automatically and not via the explicit
-``pinned`` bit in :cpp:class:`Dir`.
+Objects can only be pinned via :file:`cache.config` and while
+:ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.permit.pinning` is set to non-zero (it is zero by
+default). Objects which are in use when the write cursor is near use the same
+underlying evacuation mechanism but are handled automatically and not via the
+explicit ``pinned`` bit in :cpp:class:`Dir`.
-.. [#] It could, under certain circumstances, be accurate for none of the alternates.
+.. [#multiple-alternates] It could, under certain circumstances, be accurate for none of the alternates.
Additional Notes
====================
@@ -356,30 +440,48 @@ Some general observations on the data structures.
Cyclone buffer
--------------
-Because the cache is a cyclone cache objects are not preserved for an indefinite time. Even if the object is not stale
-it can be overwritten as the cache cycles through its volume. Marking an object as ``pinned`` preserves the object
-through the passage of the write cursor but this is done by copying the object across the gap, in effect re-storing it
-in the cache. Pinning large objects or a large number objects can lead to a excessive disk activity. The original
-purpose of pinning seems to have been for small, frequently used objects explicitly marked by the administrator.
-
-This means the purpose of expiration data on objects is simply to prevent them from being served to clients. They are
-not in the standard sense deleted or cleaned up. The space can't be immediately reclaimed in any event because writing
-only happens at the write cursor. Deleting an object consists only of removing the directory entries in the volume
-directory which suffices to (eventually) free the space and render the document inaccessible.
-
-Historically the cache is designed this way because web content was relatively small and not particularly consistent.
-The design also provides high performance and low consistency requirements. There are no fragmentation issues for the
-storage, and both cache misses and object deletions require no disk I/O. It does not deal particularly well with long
-term storage of large objects. See the :ref:`volume tagging` appendix for details on some work in this area.
+Because the cache is a *cyclone cache*, objects are not preserved for an
+indefinite time. Even if the object is not :term:`stale` it can be overwritten
+as the cache cycles through its volume. Marking an object as *pinned* preserves
+the object through the passage of the write cursor but this is done by copying
+the object across the gap, in effect re-storing it in the cache. Pinning large
+objects or a large number objects can lead to excessive disk activity. The
+original purpose of pinning was for small, frequently used objects explicitly
+marked by the administrator.
+
+This means the purpose of expiration data on objects is simply to prevent them
+from being served to clients. They are not in the standard sense deleted or
+cleaned up. The space can't be immediately reclaimed in any event, because
+writing only happens at the write cursor. Deleting an object consists only of
+removing the directory entries in the volume directory which suffices to
+(eventually) free the space and render the document inaccessible.
+
+Historically, the cache was designed this way because web content was relatively
+small and not particularly consistent. The design also provided high performance
+and low consistency requirements. There are no fragmentation issues for the
+storage, and both cache misses and object deletions require no disk I/O. It does
+not deal particularly well with long term storage of large objects. See the
+:ref:`volume tagging` appendix for details on some work in this area.
Disk Failure
------------
-The cache is designed to be relatively resistant to disk failures. Because each storage unit in each volume is mostly independent the loss of a disk simply means that the corresponding :cpp:class:`Vol` instances (one per cache volume that uses the storage unit) becomes unusable. The primary issue is updating the volume assignment table to both preserve assignments for objects on still operational volumes while distributing the assignments from the failed disk to those operational volumes. This mostly done in::
+The cache is designed to be relatively resistant to disk failures. Because each
+:term:`storage unit` in each :term:`cache volume` is mostly independent, the
+loss of a disk simply means that the corresponding :cpp:class:`Vol` instances
+(one per cache volume that uses the storage unit) becomes unusable. The primary
+issue is updating the volume assignment table to both preserve assignments for
+objects on still operational volumes while distributing the assignments from the
+failed disk to those operational volumes. This mostly done in::
AIO_Callback_handler::handle_disk_failure
-Restoring a disk to active duty is quite a bit more difficult task. Changing the volume assignment of a cache key renders any currently cached data inaccessible. This is obviouly not a problem when a disk has failed, but is a bit trickier to decide which cached objects are to be de facto evicted if a new storage unit is added to a running system. The mechanism for this, if any, is still under investigation.
+Restoring a disk to active duty is a more difficult task. Changing the volume
+assignment of a :term:`cache key` renders any currently cached data
+inaccessible. This is not a problem when a disk has failed, but is a bit
+trickier to decide which cached objects are to be de facto evicted if a new
+storage unit is added to a running system. The mechanism for this, if any, is
+still under investigation.
Implementation Details
======================
@@ -389,7 +491,7 @@ Stripe Directory
.. _directory-entry:
-The in memory volume directory entries are defined as described below.
+The in memory volume directory entries are described below.
.. cpp:class:: Dir
@@ -410,126 +512,186 @@ The in memory volume directory entries are defined as described below.
offset_high inku16 High order offset bits
=========== =================== ===================================================
- The stripe directory is an array of ``Dir`` instances. Each entry refers to a span in the volume which contains a cached object. Because every object in the cache has at least one directory entry this data has been made as small as possible.
+The stripe directory is an array of ``Dir`` instances. Each entry refers to
+a span in the volume which contains a cached object. Because every object in
+the cache has at least one directory entry this data has been made as small
+as possible.
- The offset value is the starting byte of the object in the volume. It is 40 bits long split between the *offset* (lower 24 bits) and *offset_high* (upper 16 bits) members. Note that since there is a directory for every storage unit in a cache volume, this is the offset in to the slice of a storage unit attached to that volume.
+The offset value is the starting byte of the object in the volume. It is 40
+bits long, split between the *offset* (lower 24 bits) and *offset_high*
+(upper 16 bits) members. Note that since there is a directory for every
+storage unit in a cache volume, this is the offset in to the slice of a
+storage unit attached to that volume.
.. _dir-size:
- The *size* and *big* values are used to calculate the approximate size of the fragment which contains the object. This value is used as the number of bytes to read from storage at the offset value. The exact size is contained in the object metadata in :cpp:class:`Doc` which is consulted once the read has completed. For this reason the approximate size needs to be at least as large as the actual size but can be larger, at the cost of reading the extraneous bytes.
+The *size* and *big* values are used to calculate the approximate size of
+the fragment which contains the object. This value is used as the number of
+bytes to read from storage at the offset value. The exact size is contained
+in the object metadata in :cpp:class:`Doc` which is consulted once the read
+has completed. For this reason, the approximate size needs to be at least as
+large as the actual size but can be larger, at the cost of reading the
+extraneous bytes.
- The computation of the approximate size of the fragment is defined as::
+The computation of the approximate size of the fragment is defined as::
- ( *size* + 1 ) * 2 ^ ( ``CACHE_BLOCK_SHIFT`` + 3 * *big* )
+ ( *size* + 1 ) * 2 ^ ( ``CACHE_BLOCK_SHIFT`` + 3 * *big* )
- where ``CACHE_BLOCK_SHIFT`` is the bit width of the size of a basic cache block (9, corresponding to a sector size of 512). Therefore the value with current defines is::
+Where ``CACHE_BLOCK_SHIFT`` is the bit width of the size of a basic cache
+block (9, corresponding to a sector size of 512). Therefore the value with
+current defines is::
- ( *size* + 1 ) * 2 ^ (9 + 3 * *big*)
+ ( *size* + 1 ) * 2 ^ (9 + 3 * *big*)
- Because *big* is 2 bits the values for the multiplier of *size* are
+.. _big-mult:
- .. _big-mult:
+Because *big* is 2 bits, the values for the multiplier of *size* are:
- ===== =============== ========================
- *big* Multiplier Maximum Size
- ===== =============== ========================
- 0 512 (2^9) 32768 (2^15)
- 1 4096 (2^12) 262144 (2^18)
- 2 32768 (2^15) 2097152 (2^21)
- 3 262144 (2^18) 16777216 (2^24)
- ===== =============== ========================
+ ===== =============== ========================
+ *big* Multiplier Maximum Size
+ ===== =============== ========================
+ 0 512 (2^9) 32768 (2^15)
+ 1 4096 (2^12) 262144 (2^18)
+ 2 32768 (2^15) 2097152 (2^21)
+ 3 262144 (2^18) 16777216 (2^24)
+ ===== =============== ========================
- Note also that *size* is effectively offset by one, so a value of 0 indicates a single unit of the multiplier.
+Note also that *size* is effectively offset by one, so a value of 0 indicates
+a single unit of the multiplier.
.. _target-fragment-size:
The target fragment size can set with the :file:`records.config` value
-
- ``proxy.config.cache.target_fragment_size``
-
-This value should be chosen so that it is a multiple of a :ref:`cache entry multiplier <big-mult>`. It is not necessary
-to make it a power of 2 [#]_. Larger fragments increase I/O efficiency but lead to more wasted space. The default size
-(1M, 2^20) is a reasonable choice in most circumstances altough in very specific cases there can be benefit from tuning
-this parameter. |TS| imposes an internal maximum of a 4194232 bytes which is 4M (2^22) less the size of a struct
-:cpp:class:`Doc`. In practice then the largest reasonable target fragment size is 4M - 262144 = 3932160.
-
-When a fragment is stored to disk the size data in the cache index entry is set to the finest granularity permitted by
-the size of the fragment. To determine this consult the :ref:`cache entry multipler <big-mult>` table, find the smallest
-maximum size that is at least as large as the fragment. That will indicate the value of *big* selected and therefore the
-granularity of the approximate size. That represents the largest possible amount of wasted disk I/O when the fragment is
-read from disk.
+:ts:cv:`proxy.config.cache.target_fragment_size`.
+
+This value should be chosen so that it is a multiple of a
+:ref:`cache entry multiplier <big-mult>`. It is not necessary to make it a
+power of two[#cache-mult-value]_. Larger fragments increase I/O efficiency but
+lead to more wasted space. The default size (1M, 2^20) is a reasonable choice
+in most circumstances, altough in very specific cases there can be benefit from
+tuning this parameter. |TS| imposes an internal maximum of a 4,194,232 bytes,
+which is 4M (2^22), less the size of a struct :cpp:class:`Doc`. In practice,
+the largest reasonable target fragment size is 4M - 262,144 = 3,932,160.
+
+When a fragment is stored to disk, the size data in the cache index entry is
+set to the finest granularity permitted by the size of the fragment. To
+determine this, consult the :ref:`cache entry multipler <big-mult>` table and
+find the smallest maximum size that is at least as large as the fragment. That
+will indicate the value of *big* selected and therefore the granularity of the
+approximate size. That represents the largest possible amount of wasted disk I/O
+when the fragment is read from disk.
.. index:: DIR_DEPTH, index segment, index buckets
-The set of index entries for a volume are grouped in to *segments*. The number of segments for an index is selected so
-that there are as few segments as possible such that no segment has more than 2^16 entries. Intra-segment references can
-therefore use a 16 bit value to refer to any other entry in the segment.
+The set of index entries for a volume are grouped in to :term:`segments <directory segment>`.
+The number of segments for an index is selected so that there are as few
+segments as possible such that no segment has more than 2^16 entries.
+Intra-segment references can therefore use a 16 bit value to refer to any other
+entry in the segment.
+
+Index entries in a segment are grouped :term:`buckets <directory bucket>`, each
+of ``DIR_DEPTH`` (currently 4) entries. These are handled in the standard hash
+table manner, giving somewhat less than 2^14 buckets per segment.
-Index entries in a segment are grouped *buckets* each of ``DIR_DEPTH`` (currently 4) entries. These are handled in the
-standard hash table way, giving somewhat less than 2^14 buckets per segment.
+.. [#cache-mult-value]
-.. [#] The comment in :file:`records.config` is simply wrong.
+ The comment in earlier versions of the :file:`records.config` documentation
+ which indicated that this value must be a power of two were, unfortunately,
+ mistaken and have been corrected.
.. _cache-directory-probe:
Directory Probing
-----------------
-Directory probing is locating a specific directory entry in the stripe directory based on a cache ID. This is handled
-primarily by the function :cpp:func:`dir_probe()`. This is passed the cache ID (:arg:`key`), a stripe (:arg:`d`), and a
-last collision (:arg:`last_collision`). The last of these is an in and out parameter, updated as useful during the
-probe.
-
-Given an ID, the top half (64 bits) is used as a :ref:`segment <dir-segment>` index, taken modulo the number of segments in
-the directory. The bottom half is used as a :ref:`bucket <dir-bucket>` index, taken modulo the number of buckets per
-segment. The :arg:`last_collision` value is used to mark the last matching entry returned by :cpp:func:`dir_probe`.
-
-After computing the appropriate bucket, the entries in that bucket are searched to find a match. In this case a match is
-detected by comparison of the bottom 12 bits of the cache ID (the *cache tag*). The search starts at the base entry for
-the bucket and then proceeds via the linked list of entries from that first entry. If a tag match is found and there is
-no :arg:`collision` then that entry is returned and :arg:`last_collision` is updated to that entry. If :arg:`collision`
-is set, then if it isn't the current match the search continues down the linked list, otherwise :arg:`collision` is
-cleared and the search continues. The effect of this is that matches are skipped until the last returned match
-(:arg:`last_collision`) is found, after which the next match (if any) is returned. If the search falls off the end of
-the linked list then a miss result is returned (if no last collision), otherwise the probe is restarted after clearing
-the collision on the presumption that the entry for the collision has been removed from the bucket. This can lead to
-repeats among the returned values but guarantees that no valid entry will be skipped.
-
-Last collision can therefore be used to restart a probe at a later time. This is important because the match returned
-may not be the actual object - although the hashing of the cache ID to a bucket and the tag matching is unlikely to
-create false positives, that is possible. When a fragment is read the full cache ID is available and checked and if
-wrong, that read can be discarded and the next possible match from the directory found because the cache virtual
-connection tracks the last collision value.
+Directory probing is the locating of a specific :term:`directory entry` in the
+stripe directory based on a :term:`cache ID`. This is handled primarily by the
+function :cpp:func:`dir_probe()`. This is passed the cache ID (:arg:`key`), a
+stripe (:arg:`d`), and a last collision (:arg:`last_collision`). The last of
+these is an in and out parameter, updated as useful during the probe.
+
+Given an ID, the top half (64 bits) is used as a :ref:`segment <dir-segment>`
+index, taken modulo the number of segments in the directory. The bottom half is
+used as a :ref:`bucket <dir-bucket>` index, taken modulo the number of buckets
+per segment. The :arg:`last_collision` value is used to mark the last matching
+entry returned by :cpp:func:`dir_probe`.
+
+After computing the appropriate bucket, the entries in that bucket are searched
+to find a match. In this case a match is detected by comparison of the bottom
+12 bits of the :term:`cache ID` (the *cache tag*). The search starts at the base
+entry for the bucket and then proceeds via the linked list of entries from that
+first entry. If a tag match is found and there is no :arg:`collision` then that
+entry is returned and :arg:`last_collision` is updated to that entry. If
+:arg:`collision` is set and if it isn't the current match, the search continues
+down the linked list, otherwise :arg:`collision` is cleared and the search
+continues.
+
+The effect of this is that matches are skipped until the last returned match
+(:arg:`last_collision`) is found, after which the next match (if any) is
+returned. If the search falls off the end of the linked list, then a miss result
+is returned (if no last collision), otherwise the probe is restarted after
+clearing the collision on the presumption that the entry for the collision has
+been removed from the bucket. This can lead to repeats among the returned
+values but guarantees that no valid entry will be skipped.
+
+Last collision can therefore be used to restart a probe at a later time. This
+is important because the match returned may not be the actual object. Although
+the hashing of the :term:`cache ID` to a :term:`bucket <directory bucket>` and
+the tag matching is unlikely to create false positives, it is possible. When a
+fragment is read the full cache ID is available and checked and if wrong, that
+read can be discarded and the next possible match from the directory found
+because the cache virtual connection tracks the last collision value.
----------------
Cache Operations
----------------
-Cache activity starts after the HTTP request header has been parsed and remapped. Tunneled transactions do not interact with the cache because the headers are never parsed.
+Cache activity starts after the HTTP request header has been parsed and
+remapped. Tunneled transactions do not interact with the cache because the
+headers are never parsed.
-To understand the logic we must introduce the term "cache valid" which means something that is directly related to an object that is valid to be put in the cache (e.g. a ``DELETE`` which refers to a URL that is cache valid but cannot be cached itself). This is important because |TS| computes cache validity several times during a transaction and only performs cache operations for cache valid results. The criteria used changes during the course of the transaction as well. This is done to avoid the cost of cache activity for objects that cannot be in the cache.
+To understand the logic we must introduce the term *cache valid* which means
+something that is directly related to an object that is valid to be put in the
+cache (e.g. a ``DELETE`` which refers to a URL that is cache valid but cannot
+be cached itself). This is important because |TS| computes cache validity
+several times during a transaction and only performs cache operations for cache
+valid results. The criteria used changes during the course of the transaction
+as well. This is done to avoid the cost of cache activity for objects that
+cannot be in the cache.
-The three basic cache operations are lookup, read, and write. We will take deleting entries as a special case of writing where only the volume directory is updated.
+The three basic cache operations are: lookup, read, and write. We will take
+deleting entries as a special case of writing where only the volume directory
+is updated.
-After the client request header is parsed and is determined to be potentially cacheable, a `cache lookup`_ is done. If successful a `cache read`_ is attempted. If either the lookup or the read fails and the content is considered cacheable then a `cache write`_ is attempted.
+After the client request header is parsed and is determined to be potentially
+cacheable, a `cache lookup`_ is done. If successful, a `cache read`_ is
+attempted. If either the lookup or the read fails and the content is considered
+cacheable then a `cache write`_ is attempted.
Cacheability
============
-The first thing done with a request with respect to cache is to determine whether it is potentially a valid object for the cache. After initial parsing and remapping this check is done primarily to detect a negative result because if so all further cache processing is skipped -- it will not be put in to the cache nor will a cache lookup be done. There are a number of prerequisites along with configuration options to change them. Additional cacheability checks are done later in the process when more is known about the transaction (such as plugin operations and the origin server response). Those checks are described as appropriate in the sections on the relevant operations.
+The first thing done with a request with respect to cache is to determine
+whether it is potentially a valid object for the cache. After initial parsing
+and remapping, this check is done primarily to detect a negative result, as it
+allows further cache processing to be skipped. It will not be put in to the
+cache, nor will a cache lookup be performed. There are a number of prerequisites
+along with configuration options to change them. Additional cacheability checks
+are done later in the process, when more is known about the transaction (such
+as plugin operations and the origin server response). Those checks are described
+as appropriate in the sections on the relevant operations.
-The set of things which can affect cacheability are
+The set of things which can affect cacheability are:
-* Built in constraints
-* Settings in :file:`records.config`
-* Settings in :file:`cache.config`
-* Plugin operations
+* Built in constraints.
+* Settings in :file:`records.config`.
+* Settings in :file:`cache.config`.
+* Plugin operations.
-The initial internal checks, along with their :file:`records.config` overrides[#]_, are done in::
+The initial internal checks, along with their :file:`records.config`
+overrides[#cacheability-overrides]_, are done in ``HttpTransact::is_request_cache_lookupable``.
- HttpTransact::is_request_cache_lookupable
-
-The checks that are done are
+The checks that are done are:
Cacheable Method
The request must be one of ``GET``, ``HEAD``, ``POST``, ``DELETE``, ``PUT``.
@@ -537,235 +699,329 @@ The checks that are done are
See ``HttpTransact::is_method_cache_lookupable()``.
Dynamic URL
- |TS| tries to avoid caching dynamic content because it's dynamic. A URL is considered dynamic if it
-
- * is not ``HTTP`` or ``HTTPS``
- * has query parameters
- * ends in ``asp``
- * has ``cgi`` in the path
+ |TS| tries to avoid caching dynamic content because it's dynamic. A URL is
+ considered dynamic if:
- This check can be disabled by setting a non-zero value for::
+ * It is not ``HTTP`` or ``HTTPS``,
+ * Has query parameters,
+ * Ends in ``asp``,
+ * Has ``cgi`` in the path.
- proxy.config.http.cache.cache_urls_that_look_dynamic
+ This check can be disabled by setting a non-zero value for
+ :ts:cv:`proxy.config.http.cache.cache_urls_that_look_dynamic`.
- In addition if a TTL is set for rule that matches in :file:`cache.config` then this check is not done.
+ In addition if a TTL is set for rule that matches in :file:`cache.config`
+ then this check is not done.
Range Request
Cache valid only if :ts:cv:`proxy.config.http.cache.range.lookup` in
:file:`records.config` is non-zero. This does not mean the range request
- can be cached, only that it might be satisfiable from the
- cache. In addition, :ts:cv:`proxy.config.http.cache.range.write`
- can be set to try to force a write on a range request. This
- probably has little value at the moment, but if for example the
- origin server ignores the ``Range:`` header, this option can allow
- for the response to be cached. It is disabled by default, for
- best performance.
-
-A plugin can call :c:func:`TSHttpTxnReqCacheableSet()` to force the request to be viewed as cache valid.
-
-.. [#] The code appears to check :file:`cache.config` in this logic by setting the ``does_config_permit_lookup`` in the ``cache_info.directives`` of the state machine instance but I can find no place where the value is used. The directive ``does_config_permit_storing`` is set and later checked so the directive (from the administrator point of view) is effective in preventing caching of the object.
+ can be cached, only that it might be satisfiable from the cache. In
+ addition, :ts:cv:`proxy.config.http.cache.range.write`
+ can be set to try to force a write on a range request. This
+ probably has little value at the moment, but if for example the
+ origin server ignores the ``Range:`` header, this option can allow
+ for the response to be cached. It is disabled by default, for
+ best performance.
+
+A plugin can call :c:func:`TSHttpTxnReqCacheableSet()` to force the request to
+be viewed as cache valid.
+
+.. [#cacheability-overrides]
+
+ The code appears to check :file:`cache.config` in this logic by setting the
+ ``does_config_permit_lookup`` in the ``cache_info.directives`` of the state
+ machine instance but I can find no place where the value is used. The
+ directive ``does_config_permit_storing`` is set and later checked so the
+ directive (from the administrator point of view) is effective in preventing
+ caching of the object.
Cache Lookup
============
-If the initial request is not determined to be cache invalid then a lookup is done. Cache lookup determines if an object is in the cache and if so, where it is located. In some cases the lookup proceeds to read the first ``Doc`` from disk to verify the object is still present in the cache.
+If the initial request is not determined to be cache invalid then a lookup is
+done. Cache lookup determines if an object is in the cache and if so, where it
+is located. In some cases the lookup proceeds to read the first ``Doc`` from
+disk to verify the object is still present in the cache.
-There are three basic steps to a cache lookup.
+The basic steps to a cache lookup are:
#. The cache key is computed.
- This is normally computed using the request URL but it can be overridden :ref:`by a plugin <cache-key>` . As far as I can tell the cache index string is not stored anywhere, it presumed computable from the client request header.
+ This is normally computed using the request URL but it can be overridden
+ :ref:`by a plugin <cache-key>` . The cache index string is not stored, as it
+ is presumed computable from the client request headers.
#. The cache stripe is determined (based on the cache key).
- The cache key is used as a hash key in to an array of :cpp:class:`Vol` instances. The construction and arrangement of this array is the essence of how volumes are assigned.
+ The :term:`cache key` is used as a hash key in to an array of
+ :cpp:class:`Vol` instances. The construction and arrangement of this array
+ is the essence of how volumes are assigned.
-#. The cache stripe directory :ref:`is probed <cache-directory-probe>` using the index key computed from the cache key.
+#. The cache stripe directory :ref:`is probed <cache-directory-probe>` using the
+ index key computed from the cache key.
- Various other lookaside directories are checked as well, such as the :ref:`aggregation buffer <aggregation-buffer>`.
+ Various other lookaside directories are checked as well, such as the
+ :ref:`aggregation buffer <aggregation-buffer>`.
-#. If the directory entry is found the first ``Doc`` is read from disk and checked for validity.
+#. If the directory entry is found the first ``Doc`` is read from disk and
+ checked for validity.
- This is done in :cpp:func:`CacheVC::openReadStartHead()` or :cpp:func:`CacheVC::openReadStartEarliest()` which are tightly coupled methods.
+ This is done in :cpp:func:`CacheVC::openReadStartHead()` or
+ :cpp:func:`CacheVC::openReadStartEarliest()` which are tightly coupled
+ methods.
-If the lookup succeeds then a more detailed directory entry (struct :cpp:class:`OpenDir`) is created. Note that the directory probe includes a check for an already extant ``OpenDir`` which if found is returned without additional work.
+If the lookup succeeds, then a more detailed directory entry (struct
+:cpp:class:`OpenDir`) is created. Note that the directory probe includes a check
+for an already extant ``OpenDir`` which, if found, is returned without
+additional work.
Cache Read
==========
-Cache read starts after a successful `cache lookup`_. At this point the first ``Doc`` has been loaded in to memory and can be consulted for additional information. This will always contain the HTTP headers for all alternates of the object.
+Cache read starts after a successful `cache lookup`_. At this point the first
+``Doc`` has been loaded in to memory and can be consulted for additional
+information. This will always contain the HTTP headers for all
+:term:`alternates <alternate>` of the object.
.. sidebar:: Read while write
- There is provision in the code to support "read while write", that is serving an object from cache in one transaction while it is being written in another. Several settings are needed for it to be used. See :ref:`reducing-origin-server-requests-avoiding-the-thundering-herd`. It must specifically enabled in :file:`records.config` and if not, a cache read will fail if the object is currently be written or updated.
-
-At this point an alternate for the object is selected. This is done by comparing the client request to the stored response headers, but it can be controlled by a plugin using ``TS_HTTP_ALT_SELECT_HOOK``.
-
-The content can now be checked to see if it is stale by calculating the "freshness" of the object. This is essential checking how old the object is by looking at the headers and possibly other metadata (note the headers can't be checked until we've selected an alternate).
-
-Most of this work is done in::
-
- HttpTransact::what_is_document_freshness
-
-First the TTL (time to live) value which can be set in :file:`cache.config` is checked if the request matches the configuration file line. This is done based on when the object was placed in cache, not on any data in the headers.
-
-Next an internal flag ("needs-revalidate-once") is checked if the :file:`cache.config` value "revalidate-after" is not set, and if set the object is marked "stale".
-
-After these checks the object age is calculated by::
-
- HttpTransactHeaders::calculate_document_age
-
-and then any configured fuzzing is applied. The limits to this age based on available data is calculated by::
-
- HttpTransact::calculate_document_freshness_limit
-
-How this age is used is determined by the :file:`records.config` value::
-
- proxy.config.http.cache.when_to_revalidate
-
-If this is zero then the built caclulations are used which compare the freshness limits with document age, modified by any of the client supplied cache control values ``max-age``, ``min-fresh``, ``max-stale`` unless explicitly overridden in :file:`cache.config`.
-
-If the object is not stale then it is served to the client. If stale the client request may be changed to an ``If Modified Since`` request to revalidate.
-
-The request is served using a standard virtual connection tunnel (``HttpTunnel``) with the :cpp:class:`CacheVC` acting
-as the producer and the client ``NetVC`` acting as the sink. If the request is a range request this can be modified with
-a transform to select the appropriate parts of the object or, if the request contains a single range, it can use the
-range acceleration.
-
-Range acceleration is done by consulting a fragment offset table attached to the earliest ``Doc`` which contains offsets
-for all fragments past the first. This allows loading the fragment containing the first requested byte immediately
+ There is provision in the code to support *read while write*, that is,
+ serving an object from cache in one transaction while it is being written in
+ another. Several settings are needed for it to be used. See
+ :ref:`reducing-origin-server-requests-avoiding-the-thundering-herd`. It must
+ specifically enabled in :file:`records.config` and if not, a cache read will
+ fail if the object is currently be written or updated.
+
+At this point an alternate for the object is selected. This is done by comparing
+the client request to the stored response headers, but it can be controlled by a
+plugin using ``TS_HTTP_ALT_SELECT_HOOK``.
+
+The content can now be checked to see if it is :term:`stale` by calculating the
+*freshness* of the object. This is essentially checking how old the object is
+by looking at the headers and possibly other metadata (note that the headers
+can't be checked until we've selected an alternate).
+
+Most of this work is done in ``HttpTransact::what_is_document_freshness``.
+
+First, the TTL (time to live) value, which can be set in :file:`cache.config`,
+is checked if the request matches the configuration file line. This is done
+based on when the object was placed in the cache, not on any data in the
+headers.
+
+Next, an internal flag (``needs-revalidate-once``) is checked if the
+:file:`cache.config` value ``revalidate-after`` is not set, and if set the
+object is marked *stale*.
+
+After these checks the object age is calculated by ``HttpTransactHeaders::calculate_document_age``.
+and then any configured fuzzing is applied. The limits to this age based on
+available data is calculated by ``HttpTransact::calculate_document_freshness_limit``.
+
+How this age is used is determined by the :file:`records.config` setting for
+:ts:cv:`proxy.config.http.cache.when_to_revalidate`. If this is ``0`` then the
+built caclulations are used which compare the freshness limits with document
+age, modified by any of the client supplied cache control values (``max-age``,
+``min-fresh``, ``max-stale``) unless explicitly overridden in
+:file:`cache.config`.
+
+If the object is not stale then it is served to the client. If it is stale, the
+client request may be changed to an ``If Modified Since`` request to
+:term:`revalidate <revalidation>`.
+
+The request is served using a standard virtual connection tunnel (``HttpTunnel``)
+with the :cpp:class:`CacheVC` acting as the producer and the client ``NetVC``
+acting as the sink. If the request is a range request this can be modified with
+a transform to select the appropriate parts of the object or, if the request
+contains a single range, it can use the range acceleration.
+
+Range acceleration is done by consulting a fragment offset table attached to
+the earliest ``Doc`` which contains offsets for all fragments past the first.
+This allows loading the fragment containing the first requested byte immediately
rather than performing reads on the intermediate fragments.
Cache Write
===========
-Writing to cache is handled by an instance of the class :cpp:class:`CacheVC`. This is a virtual connection which
-receives data and writes it to cache, acting as a sink. For a standard transaction data transfers between virtual
-connections (*VConns*) are handled by :cpp:class:`HttpTunnel`. Writing to cache is done by attaching a ``CacheVC``
-instance as a tunnel consumer. It therefore operates in parallel with the virtual connection that transfers data to the
-client. The data does not flow to the cache and then to the client, it is split and goes both directions in parallel.
-This avoids any data synchronization issues between the two.
+Writing to the cache is handled by an instance of the class :cpp:class:`CacheVC`.
+This is a virtual connection which receives data and writes it to cache, acting
+as a sink. For a standard transaction data transfers between virtual connections
+(*VConns*) are handled by :cpp:class:`HttpTunnel`. Writing to the cache is done
+by attaching a ``CacheVC`` instance as a tunnel consumer. It therefore operates
+in parallel with the virtual connection that transfers data to the client. The
+data does not flow to the cache and then to the client, it is split and goes
+both directions in parallel. This avoids any data synchronization issues between
+the two.
.. sidebar:: Writing to disk
- The actual write to disk is handled in a separate thread dedicated to I/O operations, the AIO threads. The cache
- logic marshals the data and then hands the operation off to the AIO thread which signals back once the operation
+ The actual write to disk is handled in a separate thread dedicated to I/O
+ operations, the AIO threads. The cache logic marshals the data and then hands
+ the operation off to the AIO thread which signals back once the operation
completes.
-While each ``CacheVC`` handles its transactions independently, they do interact at the volume level as each ``CacheVC``
-makes calls to the volume object to write its data to the volume content. The ``CacheVC`` accumulates data internally
-until either the transaction is complete or the amount of data to write exceeds the target fragment size. In the former
-case the entire object is submitted to the volume to be written. In the latter case a target fragment size amount of
-data is submitted and the ``CacheVC`` continues to operate on subsequent data. The volume in turn places these write
+While each ``CacheVC`` handles its transactions independently, they do interact
+at the :term:`volume <cache volume>` level as each ``CacheVC`` makes calls to
+the volume object to write its data to the volume content. The ``CacheVC``
+accumulates data internally until either the transaction is complete or the
+amount of data to write exceeds the target fragment size. In the former
+case the entire object is submitted to the volume to be written. In the latter
+case, a target fragment size amount of data is submitted and the ``CacheVC``
+continues to operate on subsequent data. The volume in turn places these write
requests in an holding area called the `aggregation buffer`_.
-For objects under the target fragment size there is no consideration of order, the object is simply written to the
-volume content. For larger objects the earliest ``Doc`` is written first and the first ``Doc`` written last. This
-provides some detection ability should the object be overwritten. Because of the nature of the write cursor no fragment
-after the first fragment (in the earliest ``Doc``) can be overwritten without also overwriting that first fragment
-(since we know at the time the object was finalized in the cache the write cursor was at the position of the first
-``Doc``).
+For objects under the target fragment size, there is no consideration of order,
+the object is simply written to the volume content. For larger objects, the
+earliest ``Doc`` is written first and the first ``Doc`` written last. This
+provides some detection ability should the object be overwritten. Because of
+the nature of the write cursor no fragment after the first fragment (in the
+earliest ``Doc``) can be overwritten without also overwriting that first
+fragment (since we know at the time the object was finalized in the cache the
+write cursor was at the position of the first ``Doc``).
+
+.. note::
-.. note:: It is the responsibility of the ``CacheVC`` to not submit writes that exceed the target fragment size.
+ It is the responsibility of the ``CacheVC`` to not submit writes that exceed
+ the target fragment size.
-.. how does the write logic know if it's an original object write or an update to an existing object?
+.. XXX how does the write logic know if it's an original object write or an update to an existing object?
Update
------
-Cache write also covers the case where an existing object in the cache is modified. This occurs when
+Cache write also covers the case where an existing object in the cache is
+modified. This occurs when:
+
+* A conditional request is made to the origin server and a ``304 - Not Modified``
+ response is received.
+
+* An alternate of the object is retrieved from an :term:`origin server` and
+ added to the object.
-* A conditional request is made to the origin server and a ``304 - Not Modified`` response is received.
-* An alternate of the object is retrieved from an origin server and added to the object.
* An alternate of the object is removed (e.g., due to a ``DELETE`` request).
-In every case the metadata for the object must be modified. Because |TS| never updates data already in the cache this
-means the first ``Doc`` will be written to the cache again and the volume directory entry updated. Because a client
-request has already been processed the first ``Doc`` has been read from cache and is in memory. The alternate vector is
-updated as appropriate (an entry added or removed, or changed to contain the new HTTP headers), and then written to
-disk. It is possible for multiple alternates to be updated by different ``CacheVC`` instances at the same time. The only
-contention is the first ``Doc``, the rest of the data for each alternate is completely independent.
+In every case the metadata for the object must be modified. Because |TS| never
+updates data already in the cache this means the first ``Doc`` will be written
+to the cache again and the volume directory entry updated. Because a client
+request has already been processed the first ``Doc`` has been read from cache
+and is in memory. The alternate vector is updated as appropriate (an entry
+added or removed, or changed to contain the new HTTP headers), and then written
+to disk. It is possible for multiple alternates to be updated by different
+``CacheVC`` instances at the same time. The only contention is the first
+``Doc``; the rest of the data for each alternate is completely independent.
.. _aggregation-buffer:
Aggregation Buffer
------------------
-Disk writes to cache are handled through an *aggregation buffer*. There is one for each :cpp:class:`Vol` instance. To
-minimize the number of system calls data is written to disk in units of roughly :ref:`target fragment size
-<target-fragment-size>` bytes. The algorithm used is simple - data is piled up in the aggregation buffer until no more
-will fit without going over the target fragment size, at which point the buffer is written to disk and the volume
-directory entries for objects with data in the buffer are updated with the actual disk locations for those objects
-(which are determined by the write to disk action). After the buffer is written it is cleared and process repeats. There
-is a special lookup table for the aggregation buffer so that object lookup can find cache data in that memory.
-
-Because data in the aggregation buffer is visible to other parts of the cache, particularly `cache lookup`_, there is no
-need to push a partial filled aggregation buffer to disk. In effect any such data is effectively memory cached until
+Disk writes to cache are handled through an *aggregation buffer*. There is one
+for each :cpp:class:`Vol` instance. To minimize the number of system calls data
+is written to disk in units of roughly :ref:`target fragment size <target-fragment-size>`
+bytes. The algorithm used is simple: data is piled up in the aggregation buffer
+until no more will fit without going over the target fragment size, at which
+point the buffer is written to disk and the volume directory entries for objects
+with data in the buffer are updated with the actual disk locations for those
+objects (which are determined by the write to disk action). After the buffer is
+written it is cleared and process repeats. There is a special lookup table for
+the aggregation buffer so that object lookup can find cache data in that memory.
+
+Because data in the aggregation buffer is visible to other parts of the cache,
+particularly `cache lookup`_, there is no need to push a partially filled
+aggregation buffer to disk. In effect, any such data is memory cached until
enough additional cache content arrives to fill the buffer.
-The target fragment size has little effect on small objects because the fragment sized is used only to parcel out disk
-write operations. For larger objects the effect very significant as it causes those objects to be broken up in to
-fragments at different locations on in the volume. Each fragment write has its own entry in the volume directory which
-are computational chained (each cache key is computed from the previous one). If possible a fragment table is
-accumulated in the earliest ``Doc`` which has the offsets of the first byte for each fragment.
+The target fragment size has little effect on small objects because the fragment
+size is used only to parcel out disk write operations. For larger objects the
+effect very significant as it causes those objects to be broken up in to
+fragments at different locations on in the volume. Each fragment write has its
+own entry in the volume directory which are computationally chained (each
+:term:`cache key` is computed from the previous one). If possible, a fragment
+table is accumulated in the earliest ``Doc`` which has the offsets of the first
+byte for each fragment.
+
+.. _evacuation-mechanics:
Evacuation Mechanics
--------------------
-By default the write cursor will overwrite (de facto evict from cache) objects as it proceeds once it has gone around
-the cache stripe at least once. In some cases this is not acceptable and the object is *evacuated* by reading it from
-the cache and then writing it back to cache which moves the physical storage of the object from in front of the write
-cursor to behind the write cursor. Objects that are evacuated are handled in this way based on data in stripe data
-structures (attached to the :cpp:class:`Vol` instance).
-
-Evacuation data structures are defined by dividing up the volume content in to a disjoint and contiguous set of regions
-of ``EVACUATION_BUCKET_SIZE`` bytes. The :cpp:member:`Vol::evacuate` member is an array with an element for each
-evacuation region. Each element is a doubly linked list of :cpp:class:`EvacuationBlock` instances. Each instance
-contains a :cpp:class:`Dir` that specifies the fragment to evacuate. It is assumed that an evacuation block is placed in
-the evacuation bucket (array element) that corresponds to the evacuation region in which the fragment is located
-although no ordering per bucket is enforced in the linked list (this sorting is handled during evacuation). Objects are
-evacuated by specifying the first or earliest fragment in the evactuation block. The evactuation operation will then
-continue the evacuation for subsequent fragments in the object by adding those fragments in evacuation blocks. Note that
-the actual evacuation of those fragments is delayed until the write cursor reaches the fragments, it is not necessarily
-done at the time the first / earliest fragment is evacuated.
-
-There are two types of evacuations, reader based and forced. The ``EvacuationBlock`` has a reader count to track this.
-If the reader count is zero, then it is a forced evacuation and the the target, if it exists, will be evacuated when the
-write cursor gets close. If the reader value is non-zero then it is a count of entities that are currently expecting to
-be able to read the object. Readers increment the count when they require read access to the object, or create the
-``EvacuationBlock`` with a count of 1. When a reader is finished with the object it decrements the count and removes the
-``EvacuationBlock`` if the count goes to zero. If the ``EvacuationBlock`` already exists with a count of zero, the count
-is not modified and the number of readers is not tracked, so the evacuation is valid as long as the object exists.
-
-Evacuation is driven by cache writes, essentially in :cpp:member:`Vol::aggWrite`. This method processes the pending
-cache virtual connections that are trying to write to the stripe. Some of these may be evacuation virtual connections.
-If so then the completion callback for that virtual connection is called as the data is put in to the aggregation
-buffer.
-
-When no more cache virtual connections can be processed (due to an empty queue or the aggregation buffer filling) then
-:cpp:member:`Vol::evac_range` is called to clear the range to be overwritten plus an additional
-:const:`EVACUA
<TRUNCATED>