You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2007/02/20 22:19:15 UTC
[VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
Release notes:
*
https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> [X] Alpha
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/2/21, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> On 2/21/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, UmlGraphDoclet requires that GraphViz is installed (and
> the executables are available on your path). http://www.graphviz.org/
Uh right, I forgot it! Thank you!
>
> I realize this introduces an external dependency to the Maven build.
> :( Feel free to remove it, or, if no one objects, we could document
> this in "how to build Tiles".
Remove it? No way! I think that UmlGraph "decorates" JavaDocs very well :-)
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 2/21/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to Alpha, but with a note.
>
> The JavaDocs included in binary distribution have missing image links,
> and I have filed a JIRA issue for that:
> http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-119
> For me it's ok for an alpha, anyway someone could find this problem
> unacceptable to release it.
Sorry about that. For a while I was the only one building and
publishing the website.
The Javadoc plugin is configured to use an alternate doclet which
generates UML diagrams from the code.
For example: http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-core/apidocs/org/apache/tiles/definition/package-summary.html
(Though I have not figured out why it's using that weird font and not
plain arial!)
Unfortunately, UmlGraphDoclet requires that GraphViz is installed (and
the executables are available on your path). http://www.graphviz.org/
I realize this introduces an external dependency to the Maven build.
:( Feel free to remove it, or, if no one objects, we could document
this in "how to build Tiles".
Only the release manager would really need to have it installed. The
Javadoc still "works" without the images, it just has broken image
links.
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [X] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 to Alpha, but with a note.
The JavaDocs included in binary distribution have missing image links,
and I have filed a JIRA issue for that:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/TILES-119
For me it's ok for an alpha, anyway someone could find this problem
unacceptable to release it.
Antonio
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Awesome. I'd never heard of it. I'll check it out.
Thanks for all the feedback Niall. It sure does make me more
confident knowing that people like you are double checking these things :)
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> P.S. Theres a new maven plugin[1] for the RAT[2] tool - I ran it for
> this release on the source distros and everything was good - plugin
> would help pickup issues earlier IMO
>
> [1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/team-list.html
> [2] http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=507361
>
> On 2/21/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I haven't tested Tiles 2 so I can't comment on the quality - but from
>> a release artifact PoV everythhing seems in place (I'm happy you added
>> source distros) - so +1 on getting an official ASF release out :-)
>>
>> One minor thing that you might want to fix for the next release -
>> tiles-core-2.0.1.jar has two copies of NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt
>>
>> Niall
>>
>> On 2/20/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > [ ] Leave at test build
>> > [ ] Alpha
>> > [ ] Beta
>> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
P.S. Theres a new maven plugin[1] for the RAT[2] tool - I ran it for
this release on the source distros and everything was good - plugin
would help pickup issues earlier IMO
[1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/team-list.html
[2] http://code.google.com/p/arat/
[3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=507361
On 2/21/07, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't tested Tiles 2 so I can't comment on the quality - but from
> a release artifact PoV everythhing seems in place (I'm happy you added
> source distros) - so +1 on getting an official ASF release out :-)
>
> One minor thing that you might want to fix for the next release -
> tiles-core-2.0.1.jar has two copies of NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt
>
> Niall
>
> On 2/20/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
I haven't tested Tiles 2 so I can't comment on the quality - but from
a release artifact PoV everythhing seems in place (I'm happy you added
source distros) - so +1 on getting an official ASF release out :-)
One minor thing that you might want to fix for the next release -
tiles-core-2.0.1.jar has two copies of NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt
Niall
On 2/20/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Thanks Nathan, I'll wait as long as it takes.
Nathan Bubna wrote:
> Sorry, been trying to get Velocity 1.5 out in my spare time... if you
> can wait a few days i may have a chance to vet this release.
>
> On 2/26/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> It looks like at this point we're one vote short of quorum. Anything I
>> could do to convince someone to check out the release and give it an
>> alpha quality whirl?
>>
>> What version of tiles is shale on? It looks like it's stuck on a
>> sandbox version. Perhaps an upgrade would help with testing tiles? Any
>> other ideas for getting people more interested?
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> > The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>> >
>> > Release notes:
>> >
>> > *
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Distribution:
>> >
>> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>> >
>> > Maven 2 staging repository:
>> >
>> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>> >
>> > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> with a
>> > vote on its quality:
>> >
>> > [ ] Leave at test build
>> > [ ] Alpha
>> > [ ] Beta
>> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >
>> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, been trying to get Velocity 1.5 out in my spare time... if you
can wait a few days i may have a chance to vet this release.
On 2/26/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> It looks like at this point we're one vote short of quorum. Anything I
> could do to convince someone to check out the release and give it an
> alpha quality whirl?
>
> What version of tiles is shale on? It looks like it's stuck on a
> sandbox version. Perhaps an upgrade would help with testing tiles? Any
> other ideas for getting people more interested?
>
>
> David
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
> > The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> > *
> > https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
> >
> >
> > Distribution:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
> >
> > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
> > vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Greg Reddin <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1 Alpha. Sorry it took so long :-) It's been one of those weeks again.
On 2/26/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> It looks like at this point we're one vote short of quorum. Anything I
> could do to convince someone to check out the release and give it an
> alpha quality whirl?
>
> What version of tiles is shale on? It looks like it's stuck on a
> sandbox version. Perhaps an upgrade would help with testing tiles? Any
> other ideas for getting people more interested?
>
>
> David
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
> > The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> > *
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
> >
> >
> > Distribution:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> >
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
> >
> > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
> > vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
It looks like at this point we're one vote short of quorum. Anything I
could do to convince someone to check out the release and give it an
alpha quality whirl?
What version of tiles is shale on? It looks like it's stuck on a
sandbox version. Perhaps an upgrade would help with testing tiles? Any
other ideas for getting people more interested?
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>
> Release notes:
>
> *
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
> vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
doh! Sorry. . .oh well.
David
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I must have missed something. I see:
>>
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>>
>> but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
>> were in my local repo but not the public one?
>
> Yes, that's what I meant by my comment. You uploaded signatures for
> some files that are not in the Maven repo.
>
> No big deal... the extra signatures won't hurt anything. They've
> already synced to the central repo, probably best to just leave them
> alone now.
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> I must have missed something. I see:
>
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>
> but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
> were in my local repo but not the public one?
Yes, that's what I meant by my comment. You uploaded signatures for
some files that are not in the Maven repo.
No big deal... the extra signatures won't hurt anything. They've
already synced to the central repo, probably best to just leave them
alone now.
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
I must have missed something. I see:
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
were in my local repo but not the public one?
David
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
>
> Thanks! There are a few extras, actually-- the ones for the -bin and
> -src assemblies:
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.1/
>
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
Thanks! There are a few extras, actually-- the ones for the -bin and
-src assemblies:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.1/
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/7/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
>> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
>
> David, the files (jars and poms) in the Maven repo also need
> signatures. See:
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/README.txt
Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
David
>
> At this point it's probably easiest to sign them in your local Maven
> repo and upload the signatures. There's a script that I used for a
> Struts release, here:
> http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Struts135ReleaseDiary#20060805
>
> For future releases, we can use maven-gpg-plugin.
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/7/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
David, the files (jars and poms) in the Maven repo also need
signatures. See:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/README.txt
At this point it's probably easiest to sign them in your local Maven
repo and upload the signatures. There's a script that I used for a
Struts release, here:
http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Struts135ReleaseDiary#20060805
For future releases, we can use maven-gpg-plugin.
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
I have signed the distributions and moved them to the distribution
directory. Once synchronized, I will update the website. I'll be
working on some site enhancements until then.
Thanks for your patience. . .
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Team,
>
> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
> or update the www. I probably won't have time to get to it until the
> weekend. If someone else wants to step in, please feel free, otherwise,
> I'll try to get it done asap.
>
>
> David
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> 2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
>> by all three votes.
>>
>> +1 - David, Antonio, Greg
>> 0 - n/a
>> -1 - n/a
>>
>>
>> I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
>> today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
>> first step should be done shortly.
>>
>> 1) Move maven artifacts
>> 2) Move binaries
>> 3) Update website
>> 4) Send announcement
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>>
>>> *
>>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>>>
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>>
>>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by
>>> PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at
>>> least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>
>
[STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Team,
I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
or update the www. I probably won't have time to get to it until the
weekend. If someone else wants to step in, please feel free, otherwise,
I'll try to get it done asap.
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> 2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
> by all three votes.
>
> +1 - David, Antonio, Greg
> 0 - n/a
> -1 - n/a
>
>
> I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
> today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
> first step should be done shortly.
>
> 1) Move maven artifacts
> 2) Move binaries
> 3) Update website
> 4) Send announcement
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> *
>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>>
>>
>> Distribution:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>
>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>> a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>
[RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
by all three votes.
+1 - David, Antonio, Greg
0 - n/a
-1 - n/a
I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
first step should be done shortly.
1) Move maven artifacts
2) Move binaries
3) Update website
4) Send announcement
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>
> Release notes:
>
> *
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
> vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>