[VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com>]

I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:

HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)

Here is my +1.

Nige

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>]

+1

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com> wrote:
> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
>
> HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Nige
>

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com>]

This component has been removed with Jira HADOOP-7136.

Thanks,
Nige

On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:

> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
> 
> HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> Nige

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com>]

On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:47 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:

> 
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> 
>> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
> 
> 	Are there any patches in the patch queue?

Not that I could find.  (answering your own question would have been helpful :-)

> 	When it comes to contrib, last commit is pretty useless IMO.

I'll include that info in the remaining votes.

Nige

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Allen Wittenauer <aw...@linkedin.com>]

On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:

> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:

	Are there any patches in the patch queue?

	When it comes to contrib, last commit is pretty useless IMO.

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>]

+1

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Tom White <to...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Tom
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com> wrote:
> > I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.
>  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of
> 2008:
> >
> > HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis
> of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
> >
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > Nige
> >
>



-- 
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Tom White <to...@gmail.com>]

+1

Tom

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com> wrote:
> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
>
> HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Nige
>

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 09/02/11 17:18, Nigel Daley wrote:
>
>> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's
>> last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
>>
>
+1


> I'm not sure that apache-extras is the right place. I'd more interested in
>> putting it to the apache attic and making sure that the svn to git bridge
>> works for them, so anyone who wants to fork it can do it by typing git clone
>
>
This is just a vote to remove it from Hadoop. If someone decides to adopt
it, they can choose where to host it (github, sourceforge, google code, or
apache extras, etc.). Since the code was in subversion, it will always be
available in the revision from before it was deleted.


> * keeps the code under the ASF, makes it easier to go live
>

Apache extras isn't under the ASF in any meaningful sense. Projects under
Apache extras do not have any restrictions on their governance model or even
software license. In particular, there are no PMCs over in Apache extras.


> we have an attic, so let's move it there.
>

Attic is for projects that have been retired. This is just a contrib
component that we are voting on retiring.

-- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>]

On 09/02/11 17:18, Nigel Daley wrote:
> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original commit in August of 2008:
>
> HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Nige

=0

I'm not sure that apache-extras is the right place. I'd more interested 
in putting it to the apache attic and making sure that the svn to git 
bridge works for them, so anyone who wants to fork it can do it by 
typing git clone

* keeps the code under the ASF, makes it easier to go live
* makes it easier for anyone with commit rights to pull in the source 
and work with it
* if someone wants to take it live, they will do it within apache, and 
so feed back into the code base.

we have an attic, so let's move it there.

Re: [VOTE] Abandon failmon Common contrib

[Arun C Murthy <ac...@yahoo-inc.com>]

+1

Arun

On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:

> I think the PMC should abandon the failmon common contrib  
> component.  It's last meaningful contribution was it's original  
> commit in August of 2008:
>
> HADOOP-3585. FailMon package for hardware failure monitoring and  
> analysis of anomalies. (Ioannis Koltsidas via dhruba)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Nige