You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2006/04/09 23:39:32 UTC
[Ballot] vote of candidates apr[-util] from April 9th
Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
-- rather than a huge email
+1 +/-0 -1 Package
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-0.9.12
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
[ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
Votes open - vote the packages you care to review. As these candidates are
only slighly changed, it doesn't seem unreasonable to have a 24 hour voting
period, since AFAIK none of these packages introduced much code, and were
primarily build issues for platform specific flaws, plus cleanups for apr_dbd
in apr-util-1.2.7.
Bill
Re: [Ballot] vote of candidates apr[-util] from April 9th
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> -- rather than a huge email
>
> +1 +/-0 -1 Package
> [ X] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
> [ X] [ ] [ ] apr-util-0.9.12
> [ X] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
> [ X] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
I've rolled these, including apr-iconv 1.2.7 and 1.1.1, as -win32-src.zip
packages in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/, which include win32 .mak / .dep
files generated from the .dsp files.
Bill
Re: [Ballot] vote of candidates apr[-util] from April 9th
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> +1 all, NetWare
Anyone else?
Re: [Ballot] vote of candidates apr[-util] from April 9th
Posted by Brad Nicholes <BN...@novell.com>.
>>> On 4/9/2006 at 3:39:32 pm, in message <44...@rowe-clan.net>,
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Here are the newly uploaded candidates in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
> -- rather than a huge email
>
> +1 +/-0 -1 Package
> [ ] [ ] [ ] apr-0.9.12
> [ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-0.9.12
> [ ] [ ] [ ] apr-1.2.7
> [ ] [ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.7
>
> Votes open - vote the packages you care to review. As these candidates are
> only slighly changed, it doesn't seem unreasonable to have a 24 hour voting
> period, since AFAIK none of these packages introduced much code, and were
> primarily build issues for platform specific flaws, plus cleanups for
> apr_dbd
> in apr-util-1.2.7.
>
> Bil
+1 all, NetWare
Brad