You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@jclouds.apache.org by luciaems <no...@github.com> on 2018/06/20 09:49:06 UTC

[jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1427: Fix Elastic IP deserialization when IP has tags (#1218)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218

-- Commit Summary --

  * JCLOUDS-1427: Fix Elastic IP deserialization when IP has tags

-- File Changes --

    M apis/ec2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/ec2/domain/PublicIpInstanceIdPair.java (24)
    M apis/ec2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/ec2/xml/DescribeAddressesResponseHandler.java (49)
    M apis/ec2/src/test/java/org/jclouds/ec2/compute/loaders/LoadPublicIpForInstanceOrNullTest.java (6)
    M apis/ec2/src/test/java/org/jclouds/ec2/xml/DescribeAddressesResponseHandlerTest.java (28)
    A apis/ec2/src/test/resources/describe_addresses_with_tags.xml (24)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218.patch
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1427: Fix Elastic IP deserialization when IP has tags (#1218)

Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Closed #1218.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218#event-1691139754

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1427: Fix Elastic IP deserialization when IP has tags (#1218)

Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Pushed to [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/6b4be0d6) and [2.1.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/ef486984). Thanks @luciaems!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1218#issuecomment-398749443