You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> on 2009/08/25 03:08:39 UTC

[VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.

I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.

Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

Here's my vote +1.

-Ben Dewey


Mentors,

Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC voting?

Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Ming Jin <sk...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Joby Abragan-Lee <Joby.Abragan-Lee@26ny.com
> wrote:

> +1
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Ben Dewey [Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:08 PM
> To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk
>
> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had
> a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of
> some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the
> METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test
> and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when
> the code is moved to trunk.
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
>
> Here's my vote +1.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> Mentors,
>
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC
> voting?
>



-- 
Ming Jin

Consultant
Thoughtworks, Inc
Mobile: +86 135-2125-6300
Email: skyairmj@gmail.com
MSN: skyairmj@hotmail.com
Blog:  http://blogjava.net/mingj
Twitter: https://twitter.com/mingjin

RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Joby Abragan-Lee <Jo...@26ny.com>.
+1

________________________________________
From: Ben Dewey [Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:08 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.

I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.

Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

Here's my vote +1.

-Ben Dewey


Mentors,

Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC voting?

Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <ut...@gmail.com>.
+1

Regards,
Shankar

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Ben Dewey<Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.
>
> Here's my vote +1.
>
> -Ben Dewey
>
>
> Mentors,
>
> Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC voting?
>



-- 
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"

RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Kent Brown <Ke...@microsoft.com>.
+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:09 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.

I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.


Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

Here's my vote +1.

-Ben Dewey


Mentors,

Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC voting?


RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Scott Golightly <sc...@hotmail.com>.
+1

Scott Golightly

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:09 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a
few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of
some endpoint name conflicts.

I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the
METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test
and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when
the code is moved to trunk.


Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

Here's my vote +1.

-Ben Dewey


Mentors,

Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC
voting?

RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Michael Champion <Mi...@microsoft.com>.
+1
________________________________________
From: Ben Dewey [Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08 PM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.

I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.

Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

Here's my vote +1.

-Ben Dewey


Mentors,

Does the contrib code look good (legally)?  Does this require any PMC voting?


RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by "Agrawal, Avantika" <aa...@wharton.upenn.edu>.
+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:chintanaw@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:38 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Ben Dewey<Be...@26ny.com> wrote:

> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

+1

Bye,

    -Chintana

-- 
http://engwar.com/

Re: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

Posted by Chintana Wilamuna <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Ben Dewey<Be...@26ny.com> wrote:

> I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to trunk,  We've had a few testers that were able to get interop working, with the exception of some endpoint name conflicts.
>
> I've committed and tested the changes for the name conflict.  The work the METRO guys have done is great and we should get it moved over so we can test and prepare for our next release.  Any further issues can be addressed when the code is moved to trunk.
>
> Please vote +1, 0, or -1 (with comments) on this vote.

+1

Bye,

    -Chintana

-- 
http://engwar.com/