You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Paulo Motta <pa...@gmail.com> on 2021/04/10 15:33:55 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve JIRA and Github ticket higyene
Hi folks,
I consolidated the proposal previously discussed on how to improve JIRA
ticket hygiene and visibility on this document [1]. For now I focused on
JIRA to keep things simple, once we have that done we can do the github
part.
I would greatly appreciate the community's feedback and suggestions on this
proposal.
Cheers,
Paulo
[1] -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PDFoHVq_KvZZdMaXJ4HYdpPwaU_5748U-gOCq7Slbao/edit
Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 22:04, Paulo Motta <pa...@gmail.com>
escreveu:
> Great, thanks for the feedback!
>
> I will consolidate this discussion on a more concrete proposal and share
> with the community for validation when I have it.
>
> In the meantime if anyone has additional suggestions feel free to chime in.
>
> Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 06:23, Benjamin Lerer <b....@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> The proposal sounds good to me.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this problem Paulo.
>>
>> Le mer. 24 mars 2021 à 09:05, Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> a écrit :
>>
>> > >
>> > > What do you think about this alternative proposal?
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Perfect! All my concerns are addressed, thanks for taking the time
>> Paulo.
>> >
>> > Quite excited now at the prospect of what this undertaking means for us.
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve JIRA and Github ticket higyene
Posted by Berenguer Blasi <be...@gmail.com>.
Just suggested using jira filters subscription as a low investment
alternative for the POC. Nice initiative imo.
On 10/4/21 23:18, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> One brief note but otherwise LGTM as a starting point for trying something
> out.
>
> ~Josh
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:34 AM Paulo Motta <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I consolidated the proposal previously discussed on how to improve JIRA
>> ticket hygiene and visibility on this document [1]. For now I focused on
>> JIRA to keep things simple, once we have that done we can do the github
>> part.
>>
>> I would greatly appreciate the community's feedback and suggestions on this
>> proposal.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Paulo
>>
>> [1] -
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PDFoHVq_KvZZdMaXJ4HYdpPwaU_5748U-gOCq7Slbao/edit
>>
>> Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 22:04, Paulo Motta <
>> pauloricardomg@gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Great, thanks for the feedback!
>>>
>>> I will consolidate this discussion on a more concrete proposal and share
>>> with the community for validation when I have it.
>>>
>>> In the meantime if anyone has additional suggestions feel free to chime
>> in.
>>> Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 06:23, Benjamin Lerer <b....@gmail.com>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> The proposal sounds good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking into this problem Paulo.
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 24 mars 2021 à 09:05, Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> a écrit
>> :
>>>>>> What do you think about this alternative proposal?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perfect! All my concerns are addressed, thanks for taking the time
>>>> Paulo.
>>>>> Quite excited now at the prospect of what this undertaking means for
>> us.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cassandra.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Improve JIRA and Github ticket higyene
Posted by Joshua McKenzie <jm...@apache.org>.
One brief note but otherwise LGTM as a starting point for trying something
out.
~Josh
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:34 AM Paulo Motta <pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I consolidated the proposal previously discussed on how to improve JIRA
> ticket hygiene and visibility on this document [1]. For now I focused on
> JIRA to keep things simple, once we have that done we can do the github
> part.
>
> I would greatly appreciate the community's feedback and suggestions on this
> proposal.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paulo
>
> [1] -
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PDFoHVq_KvZZdMaXJ4HYdpPwaU_5748U-gOCq7Slbao/edit
>
> Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 22:04, Paulo Motta <
> pauloricardomg@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > Great, thanks for the feedback!
> >
> > I will consolidate this discussion on a more concrete proposal and share
> > with the community for validation when I have it.
> >
> > In the meantime if anyone has additional suggestions feel free to chime
> in.
> >
> > Em qua., 24 de mar. de 2021 às 06:23, Benjamin Lerer <b....@gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> The proposal sounds good to me.
> >>
> >> Thanks for looking into this problem Paulo.
> >>
> >> Le mer. 24 mars 2021 à 09:05, Mick Semb Wever <mc...@apache.org> a écrit
> :
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think about this alternative proposal?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Perfect! All my concerns are addressed, thanks for taking the time
> >> Paulo.
> >> >
> >> > Quite excited now at the prospect of what this undertaking means for
> us.
> >> >
> >>
> >
>