You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Wes McKinney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/28 20:18:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-1402) [C++] Possibly deprecate public
APIs that use MutableBuffer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16144284#comment-16144284 ]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-1402:
-------------------------------------
PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1001
> [C++] Possibly deprecate public APIs that use MutableBuffer
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1402
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Assignee: Wes McKinney
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>
> I am not sure it is useful to expose {{arrow::MutableBuffer}} as the out argument in functions like {{arrow::AllocateBuffer}}. See e.g. http://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/namespacearrow.html#a4e4daf985e41d6879c9dbb0131157c51
> In my experience this is more of a nuisance than anything, as mutability is a dynamic property of buffers (we have {{buffer->is_mutable()}} on base instances). If we were doing a lot of compile time reasoning about buffers, that would be a different story, but we are not.
> I don't think we should nix the MutableBuffer class, just return pointers to base from functions. We can still get it back with {{std::dynamic_pointer_cast}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)