You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2018/04/24 22:39:55 UTC
There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to show
the work done
Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
emulated?
I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
thanks!
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
So you mean that ControlsExample are looking wrong and components should
appear? Strange...
Ok, hope someone could take a look, since I think it could be another good
point to make noise in social networks...a good one :)
thanks
2018-05-03 20:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I haven't looked at those examples in a long time. My main focus is on
> getting the Flex SDK Mustella tests to run. I've got plenty on my plate
> right now so it would be good for others to figure out why things are going
> wrong and get to know the emulation components better.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/3/18, 9:29 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
> <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I finaly could build MXRoyale with maven and:
>
> 1.- HelloWorld; I can see the label "Hello World" but only on
> js-release,
> not in js-debug. So I think that's weird, did you saw that issue?
>
> 2.- ControlsExample: compile but I see the same as in 1) nothing in
> debug
> and HelloWorld label in release. I suppose that's normal since I
> remember
> you want to make all compile, but still don't have visuals. That's
> right?
>
> thanks
>
> 2018-04-26 19:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses
> modules
> > extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for
> any
> > serious royale application out there.
> > I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time.
> As
> > you say, we should:
> >
> > 1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we
> could see
> > a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but
> doesn't
> > look pretty at that time
> >
> > 2.- make it match HTML look and feel
> >
> > For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to
> get
> > more a more needed components on Jewel.
> >
> > In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look
> like
> > MX and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that,
> and I
> > don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think
> MX and
> > Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes
> on
> > screen and events working.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while
> >> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF
> output as
> >> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the
> Flash
> >> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings.
> Eventually, I hope
> >> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel
> >> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look
> great, it
> >> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to
> make
> >> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier.
> >>
> >> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be
> >> interesting to see.
> >>
> >> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these
> components is
> >> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts
> >>
> >> My 2 cents,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> >> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Alex,
> >>
> >> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> >>
> >> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all.
> >> There are
> >> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
> >> >
> >>
> >> That sounds very good. Congrats!
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest.
> The
> >> first six
> >> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that
> tested
> >> internals
> >> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work
> because to
> >> get that
> >> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some
> >> containers as
> >> > well.
> >> >
> >> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and
> I have
> >> been
> >> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much
> time on
> >> this as
> >> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help.
> >> Getting all
> >> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to
> run is
> >> going to
> >> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark
> working
> >> in this
> >> > short amount of time is not realistic.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on
> board
> >> showing
> >> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I
> had a
> >> long
> >> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can
> blog,
> >> twit and
> >> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key
> factor.
> >>
> >> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social
> >> networks. I
> >> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven.
> I'll do
> >> it
> >> today in order to see it working.
> >>
> >> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about
> it,
> >> maybe we
> >> can bring you more people to help in that effort.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Carlos
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > My 2 cents,
> >> > -Alex
> >> >
> >> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
> Carlos
> >> > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
> >> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation
> >> components to
> >> > show
> >> > the work done
> >> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components
> that we
> >> have now
> >> > emulated?
> >> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
> >> >
> >> > thanks!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Carlos Rovira
> >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%4
> >> 0adobe.com%
> >> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
> >> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> >> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> >> com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> >> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghX
> >> prH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJD
> Dg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJD
> Dg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Carlos,
I haven't looked at those examples in a long time. My main focus is on getting the Flex SDK Mustella tests to run. I've got plenty on my plate right now so it would be good for others to figure out why things are going wrong and get to know the emulation components better.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 5/3/18, 9:29 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Alex,
I finaly could build MXRoyale with maven and:
1.- HelloWorld; I can see the label "Hello World" but only on js-release,
not in js-debug. So I think that's weird, did you saw that issue?
2.- ControlsExample: compile but I see the same as in 1) nothing in debug
and HelloWorld label in release. I suppose that's normal since I remember
you want to make all compile, but still don't have visuals. That's right?
thanks
2018-04-26 19:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses modules
> extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for any
> serious royale application out there.
> I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time. As
> you say, we should:
>
> 1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we could see
> a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but doesn't
> look pretty at that time
>
> 2.- make it match HTML look and feel
>
> For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to get
> more a more needed components on Jewel.
>
> In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look like
> MX and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that, and I
> don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think MX and
> Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes on
> screen and events working.
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while
>> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as
>> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash
>> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. Eventually, I hope
>> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel
>> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it
>> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to make
>> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier.
>>
>> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be
>> interesting to see.
>>
>> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is
>> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>>
>> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all.
>> There are
>> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
>> >
>>
>> That sounds very good. Congrats!
>>
>>
>> >
>> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The
>> first six
>> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested
>> internals
>> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to
>> get that
>> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some
>> containers as
>> > well.
>> >
>> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have
>> been
>> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on
>> this as
>> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help.
>> Getting all
>> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is
>> going to
>> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working
>> in this
>> > short amount of time is not realistic.
>> >
>>
>> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board
>> showing
>> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a
>> long
>> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog,
>> twit and
>> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
>>
>> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social
>> networks. I
>> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do
>> it
>> today in order to see it working.
>>
>> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it,
>> maybe we
>> can bring you more people to help in that effort.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> >
>> > My 2 cents,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
>> carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation
>> components to
>> > show
>> > the work done
>> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we
>> have now
>> > emulated?
>> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
>> >
>> > thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%4
>> 0adobe.com%
>> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
>> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
>> com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
>> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghX
>> prH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJDDg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJDDg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Alex,
I finaly could build MXRoyale with maven and:
1.- HelloWorld; I can see the label "Hello World" but only on js-release,
not in js-debug. So I think that's weird, did you saw that issue?
2.- ControlsExample: compile but I see the same as in 1) nothing in debug
and HelloWorld label in release. I suppose that's normal since I remember
you want to make all compile, but still don't have visuals. That's right?
thanks
2018-04-26 19:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses modules
> extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for any
> serious royale application out there.
> I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time. As
> you say, we should:
>
> 1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we could see
> a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but doesn't
> look pretty at that time
>
> 2.- make it match HTML look and feel
>
> For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to get
> more a more needed components on Jewel.
>
> In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look like
> MX and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that, and I
> don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think MX and
> Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes on
> screen and events working.
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while
>> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as
>> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash
>> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. Eventually, I hope
>> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel
>> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it
>> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to make
>> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier.
>>
>> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be
>> interesting to see.
>>
>> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is
>> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts
>>
>> My 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>>
>> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all.
>> There are
>> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
>> >
>>
>> That sounds very good. Congrats!
>>
>>
>> >
>> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The
>> first six
>> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested
>> internals
>> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to
>> get that
>> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some
>> containers as
>> > well.
>> >
>> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have
>> been
>> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on
>> this as
>> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help.
>> Getting all
>> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is
>> going to
>> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working
>> in this
>> > short amount of time is not realistic.
>> >
>>
>> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board
>> showing
>> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a
>> long
>> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog,
>> twit and
>> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
>>
>> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social
>> networks. I
>> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do
>> it
>> today in order to see it working.
>>
>> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it,
>> maybe we
>> can bring you more people to help in that effort.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> >
>> > My 2 cents,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
>> > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
>> carlosrovira@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation
>> components to
>> > show
>> > the work done
>> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we
>> have now
>> > emulated?
>> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
>> >
>> > thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%4
>> 0adobe.com%
>> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
>> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
>> com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
>> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghX
>> prH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Alex,
you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses modules
extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for any
serious royale application out there.
I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time. As you
say, we should:
1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we could see
a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but doesn't
look pretty at that time
2.- make it match HTML look and feel
For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to get
more a more needed components on Jewel.
In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look like MX
and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that, and I
don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think MX and
Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes on
screen and events working.
Thanks
Carlos
2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while
> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as
> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash
> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. Eventually, I hope
> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel
> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it
> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to make
> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier.
>
> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be
> interesting to see.
>
> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is
> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all.
> There are
> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
> >
>
> That sounds very good. Congrats!
>
>
> >
> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The
> first six
> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested
> internals
> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to
> get that
> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some
> containers as
> > well.
> >
> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have
> been
> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on
> this as
> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help.
> Getting all
> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is
> going to
> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working
> in this
> > short amount of time is not realistic.
> >
>
> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board
> showing
> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a
> long
> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog,
> twit and
> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
>
> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social
> networks. I
> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do
> it
> today in order to see it working.
>
> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it,
> maybe we
> can bring you more people to help in that effort.
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation
> components to
> > show
> > the work done
> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we
> have now
> > emulated?
> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com%
> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghXprH5aP17Ftt%
> 2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Carlos,
I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. Eventually, I hope that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to make sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier.
If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be interesting to see.
I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Alex,
2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all. There are
> examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
>
That sounds very good. Congrats!
>
> In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The first six
> tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested internals
> were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to get that
> much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some containers as
> well.
>
> But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have been
> distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on this as
> I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help. Getting all
> of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is going to
> be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working in this
> short amount of time is not realistic.
>
Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board showing
Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a long
journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog, twit and
so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social networks. I
tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do it
today in order to see it working.
If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it, maybe we
can bring you more people to help in that effort.
Thanks
Carlos
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to
> show
> the work done
> Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
> emulated?
> I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
>
> thanks!
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
> 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghXprH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Alex,
2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all. There are
> examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
>
That sounds very good. Congrats!
>
> In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The first six
> tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested internals
> were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to get that
> much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some containers as
> well.
>
> But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have been
> distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on this as
> I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help. Getting all
> of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is going to
> be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working in this
> short amount of time is not realistic.
>
Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board showing
Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a long
journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog, twit and
so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor.
Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social networks. I
tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do it
today in order to see it working.
If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it, maybe we
can bring you more people to help in that effort.
Thanks
Carlos
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to
> show
> the work done
> Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
> emulated?
> I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
>
> thanks!
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%
> 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: There's some example of MXRoyale to look at?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all. There are examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark.
In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The first six tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested internals were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to get that much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some containers as well.
But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have been distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on this as I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help. Getting all of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is going to be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working in this short amount of time is not realistic.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation components to show
the work done
Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we have now
emulated?
I'm interested in watch what we have actually.
thanks!
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2%2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0