You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by simon <si...@chello.at> on 2008/07/22 21:30:37 UTC
Re: MyFaces Build Tools (was Re: [vote] release of Trinidad
plugins (1.2.7))
I was about to ask the same thing :-).
Leonardo would be the expert on this, but I presume that the plugins at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/trunk/maven2-plugins/
are identical in function to the ones at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/trunk/
I certainly haven't messed with them except to fix invalid headers. So
AFAIK they could be used to build Trinidad.
Hmm..as those header-fix patches haven't been applied to the
trinidad-maven dir, your new release does contain a few files that are
not have the proper license headers that the ASF requires. For example,
AbstractFacesMojo.java and a coupld of the pom.xml files. There are so
few that I don't think it's release critical but they should be fixed
sometime.
And yes IMO it would make more sense to have just one active development
line of this code. These plugins do seem to be generally useful, so to
me it would make sense to use the "generic" myfaces-build-tools ones in
future releases. It would involve a little bit more work to release them
though. You seem to be taking the approach currently of just releasing
the whole plugin batch, regardless of whether anything has changed, and
not bothering with release notes for any of them etc. When the plugins
are *only* used for trinidad then that is probably acceptable; if
trinidad passes its test suite then by definition the plugins are
working ok for their intended purpose. But that approach is probably a
little too casual for tools that can be used by multiple projects.
Changing over doesn't seem worth doing right now; it would presumably
take a day or so to convert Trinidad over and verify they are all
working ok which would delay the release you're working on.
By the way, I'm a little confused by your release procedure here. Your
email says that you are creating a 1.2.7 release. But:
* you've created a directory tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.2.7
(a) the name seems weird to me
(b) it has been created although the vote has not yet passed
* you've created a "branches/matzew-1.2.7-release" directory, where the
pom has a version of 1.2.8-SNAPSHOT. What is this for?
* you've created a "branches/1.2.7.1-branch" directory, where the pom
has a version of 1.2.7.1. What is this for?
I see that the official repo has 1.2.6 as the latest, ie 1.2.7 is the
next expected release...
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/myfaces/trinidadbuild/maven-faces-plugin/
Regards,
Simon
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 19:47 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi Leo / Simon,
>
> I know there is the "master myfaces build tool suite" :)
> I now wonder if the "maven-faces-plugin" is still working with Trinidad ?
> If so, I will test a separate Trinidad-Core branch to run against that
> in the future.
> Would be better, to use one toolset, right ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
> > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out.
> >
> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
> >
> > Please take a look at the "1.2.7" artifacts and vote.
> >
> > How to test those JARs ?
> >
> > Use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
> > ...
> > <pluginRepositories>
> > <pluginRepository>
> > <id>apache.stage</id>
> > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
> > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/127-plugins</url>
> > <layout>default</layout>
> > </pluginRepository>
> > </pluginRepositories>
> > ...
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed and tested the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/127-plugins
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces Build Tools (was Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.7))
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
>> I always create a "private" branch to make sure I don't destroy the trunk ;-)
>> So, if something went wrong during "mvn release:prepare" it is only broken
>> on my private branch.
>
> Ok. So this will be deleted when the vote has passed?
yes. usually on the same day :-)
>
>>
>> > * you've created a "branches/1.2.7.1-branch" directory, where the pom
>> > has a version of 1.2.7.1. What is this for?
>>
>> this is another private branch, which I once in a while create.
>> Idea behind this is maintaining the 1.2.7 release. This was created
>> by accident. Usually this is not needed on the plugins, but we had already
>> a 1.x.y.1 release in the past... where something was really bad, but it wasn't
>> worth to do a new 1.x.y+1 release. Does that make sense ?
>
> Why not wait until it is needed before creating it? Less work, and less confusion. When a critical patch is needed, can't the release tag be copied into the branches dir as a base for the new work?
yes. I made a mistake.
a) I usually use the TAG
b) I usually do it on the plugins only, when needed.
-M
>
> Cheers, Simon
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces Build Tools (was Re: [vote] release of Trinidad
plugins (1.2.7))
Posted by simon <si...@chello.at>.
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 21:41 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > By the way, I'm a little confused by your release procedure here. Your
> > email says that you are creating a 1.2.7 release. But:
> > * you've created a directory tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.2.7
>
> yes, that what the release-plugin does for me.
Then I guess I'm really complaining about how maven-release-plugin
works. We have a non-approved tag sitting right next to the approved
tags with absolutely no way for users to tell them apart, for the time
that it takes for the vote to either pass or fail. And using a weird dir
name. Doesn't seem like a sane approach to me. But that's really
off-topic for this vote; as you note it is maven-release-plugin doing
this.
>
> > (a) the name seems weird to me
>
> it creates a TAG out of the branch (or trunk) against which you run the plugin.
Ah, actually I think what maven-release-plugin is doing is using the
artifactId of the pom as the name of the new tag directory.
So what is really the issue is that the root pom here has a specific
name ("maven-plugin-parent") rather than a generic name ("plugins" or
similar).
Or the issue is maven-release-plugin's use of the pom artifactId as the
tag name. Did I mention that I think maven-release-plugin sucks? :-)
>
> > (b) it has been created although the vote has not yet passed
> the release is not out, yes. that is "just" the TAG (from the
> release:prepare task).
> When ever a release get's reverted, you can simple clean that (mess) up.
Yes. But it's just not clean to mix approved and unapproved stuff
together even if it can be "cleaned up" later. Not critical, but not
nice.
>
> > * you've created a "branches/matzew-1.2.7-release" directory, where the
> > pom has a version of 1.2.8-SNAPSHOT. What is this for?
>
> I always create a "private" branch to make sure I don't destroy the trunk ;-)
> So, if something went wrong during "mvn release:prepare" it is only broken
> on my private branch.
Ok. So this will be deleted when the vote has passed?
>
> > * you've created a "branches/1.2.7.1-branch" directory, where the pom
> > has a version of 1.2.7.1. What is this for?
>
> this is another private branch, which I once in a while create.
> Idea behind this is maintaining the 1.2.7 release. This was created
> by accident. Usually this is not needed on the plugins, but we had already
> a 1.x.y.1 release in the past... where something was really bad, but it wasn't
> worth to do a new 1.x.y+1 release. Does that make sense ?
Why not wait until it is needed before creating it? Less work, and less confusion. When a critical patch is needed, can't the release tag be copied into the branches dir as a base for the new work?
Cheers, Simon
>
Re: MyFaces Build Tools (was Re: [vote] release of Trinidad plugins (1.2.7))
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:30 PM, simon <si...@chello.at> wrote:
> I was about to ask the same thing :-).
>
> Leonardo would be the expert on this, but I presume that the plugins at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/trunk/maven2-plugins/
> are identical in function to the ones at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/trunk/
>
> I certainly haven't messed with them except to fix invalid headers. So
> AFAIK they could be used to build Trinidad.
that would be great.
I haven't "backported" all fixes from the Trinidad one, yet.
but that is a piece of cake ;-)
>
> Hmm..as those header-fix patches haven't been applied to the
> trinidad-maven dir, your new release does contain a few files that are
> not have the proper license headers that the ASF requires. For example,
> AbstractFacesMojo.java and a coupld of the pom.xml files. There are so
> few that I don't think it's release critical but they should be fixed
> sometime.
ok, I think I know what files that are...
sorry. I agree that this is not really critical.
>
> And yes IMO it would make more sense to have just one active development
> line of this code. These plugins do seem to be generally useful, so to
> me it would make sense to use the "generic" myfaces-build-tools ones in
> future releases. It would involve a little bit more work to release them
> though. You seem to be taking the approach currently of just releasing
> the whole plugin batch, regardless of whether anything has changed, and
> not bothering with release notes for any of them etc. When the plugins
I use what JIRA offers, once the release is out.
> are *only* used for trinidad then that is probably acceptable; if
> trinidad passes its test suite then by definition the plugins are
> working ok for their intended purpose. But that approach is probably a
> little too casual for tools that can be used by multiple projects.
>
> Changing over doesn't seem worth doing right now; it would presumably
> take a day or so to convert Trinidad over and verify they are all
> working ok which would delay the release you're working on.
>
> By the way, I'm a little confused by your release procedure here. Your
> email says that you are creating a 1.2.7 release. But:
> * you've created a directory tags/maven-plugin-parent-1.2.7
yes, that what the release-plugin does for me.
> (a) the name seems weird to me
it creates a TAG out of the branch (or trunk) against which you run the plugin.
> (b) it has been created although the vote has not yet passed
the release is not out, yes. that is "just" the TAG (from the
release:prepare task).
When ever a release get's reverted, you can simple clean that (mess) up.
> * you've created a "branches/matzew-1.2.7-release" directory, where the
> pom has a version of 1.2.8-SNAPSHOT. What is this for?
I always create a "private" branch to make sure I don't destroy the trunk ;-)
So, if something went wrong during "mvn release:prepare" it is only broken
on my private branch.
> * you've created a "branches/1.2.7.1-branch" directory, where the pom
> has a version of 1.2.7.1. What is this for?
this is another private branch, which I once in a while create.
Idea behind this is maintaining the 1.2.7 release. This was created
by accident. Usually this is not needed on the plugins, but we had already
a 1.x.y.1 release in the past... where something was really bad, but it wasn't
worth to do a new 1.x.y+1 release. Does that make sense ?
>
> I see that the official repo has 1.2.6 as the latest, ie 1.2.7 is the
> next expected release...
true, once the vote has passed, the 1.2.7 is the next release
-M
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/myfaces/trinidadbuild/maven-faces-plugin/
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 19:47 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> Hi Leo / Simon,
>>
>> I know there is the "master myfaces build tool suite" :)
>> I now wonder if the "maven-faces-plugin" is still working with Trinidad ?
>> If so, I will test a separate Trinidad-Core branch to run against that
>> in the future.
>> Would be better, to use one toolset, right ?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
>> > MyFaces Trinidad Maven 2 Plugins out.
>> >
>> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]).
>> >
>> > Please take a look at the "1.2.7" artifacts and vote.
>> >
>> > How to test those JARs ?
>> >
>> > Use the stage repo inside your pom.xml file:
>> > ...
>> > <pluginRepositories>
>> > <pluginRepository>
>> > <id>apache.stage</id>
>> > <name>Apache Stage Repository</name>
>> > <url>http://people.apache.org/~matzew/127-plugins</url>
>> > <layout>default</layout>
>> > </pluginRepository>
>> > </pluginRepositories>
>> > ...
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------
>> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed and tested the bits
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> > and why..............
>> > ------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/127-plugins
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >
>> > further stuff:
>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org