[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2723) Updates to the processcomments.rb file

["Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2723:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Simon Laws

> Updates to the processcomments.rb file
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2723
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2723
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Java SCA Verification Tests
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.3
>            Reporter: Yiwen Huang
>            Assignee: Simon Laws
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: assembly_wiki_output.txt, javaapi_wiki_output.txt, processcomments.patch, wsbinding_wiki_output.txt
>
>
> Hi,
> In this patch, I have attempted to add two new columns: OASISConformance & OASISdivergance.
> For OASISConformance, it looks for "ASMXXXXX" (where "XXXXX" are numbers) in the comments of each vtest method.  This indicates which OASIS conformance item the method covers.
> For OASISdivergance, it is simply hard-coded to "yes" for the moment.  Once we decide how we want to indicate if a vtest method diverges between OSOA and OASIS specs.  We need to update processcomments.rb to parse the proper text.
> Another change I had to make is to add a "require 'date'" statement at the beginning, in order to be able to run the processcomments.rb file.  Not sure if it is due to a problem in my ruby enviornment (if it was working with the statement before).  Based on my understanding of the ruby language, I think it is safer to have the require statement, so I went ahead and added it.
> Please let me know if there is any questions or problems with the changes I made, thanks!
> Best Regards,
> Yiwen

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.