You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by hw...@apache.org on 2011/03/03 23:49:55 UTC

svn commit: r1076863 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Author: hwright
Date: Thu Mar  3 22:49:54 2011
New Revision: 1076863

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076863&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Move r1036429 to the Approved section.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1076863&r1=1076862&r2=1076863&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Thu Mar  3 22:49:54 2011
@@ -109,21 +109,6 @@ Candidate changes:
      -0:  stsp (I'd say no...)
      -0: pburba (I see no harm, but have to agree with stsp)
 
- * r1036429
-   Fix svnsync_tests 29 for BDB.
-   Justification:
-     Avoids an assert in the server.
-   Votes:
-     +1: philip
-     +0: stsp (it fixes the test, but pburba asked on IRC how this change
-               will affect replaced directories and I'm not sure about that)
-     +1: pburba (since we reverted r962377-962378 in r1037005 - see
-                 http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-11/0412.shtml, this
-                 change is now dependent on the new set of issue #3641 fixes
-                 that are currently nominated...so my +1 is conditional on
-                 that fix being applied first.)
-     +1: danielsh (pburba: a fix to #3641 was committed to trunk)
-
  * r1028084, r1028125, r1041638
    Fix JVM recognition on OS X Snow Leopard (10.6).
    Justification:
@@ -335,3 +320,18 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
 
 Approved changes:
 =================
+
+ * r1036429
+   Fix svnsync_tests 29 for BDB.
+   Justification:
+     Avoids an assert in the server.
+   Votes:
+     +1: philip
+     +0: stsp (it fixes the test, but pburba asked on IRC how this change
+               will affect replaced directories and I'm not sure about that)
+     +1: pburba (since we reverted r962377-962378 in r1037005 - see
+                 http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-11/0412.shtml, this
+                 change is now dependent on the new set of issue #3641 fixes
+                 that are currently nominated...so my +1 is conditional on
+                 that fix being applied first.)
+     +1: danielsh (pburba: a fix to #3641 was committed to trunk)