You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Sean Owen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/09 14:01:39 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-6162) Handle missing values in GBM

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sean Owen resolved SPARK-6162.
------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

> Handle missing values in GBM
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-6162
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6162
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1
>            Reporter: Devesh Parekh
>
> We build a lot of predictive models over data combined from multiple sources, where some entries may not have all sources of data and so some values are missing in each feature vector. Another place this might come up is if you have features from slightly heterogeneous items (or items composed of heterogeneous subcomponents) that share many features in common but may have extra features for different types, and you don't want to manually train models for every different type.
> R's GBM library, which is what we are currently using, deals with this type of data nicely by making "missing" nodes in the decision tree (a surrogate split) for features that can have missing values. We'd like to do the same with MLLib, but LabeledPoint would need to support missing values, and GradientBoostedTrees would need to be modified to deal with them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org