You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cloudstack.apache.org by "erikbocks (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2026/05/21 19:45:30 UTC

[PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

erikbocks opened a new pull request, #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212

   ### Description
   
   This PR handles the conversion of command's timeout for incremental snapshots, complementing the #13210 changes (reason: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13210#issuecomment-4512074842). 
   
   ### Types of changes
   
   - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
   - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
   - [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
   - [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
   - [ ] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
   - [ ] Build/CI
   - [ ] Test (unit or integration test code)
   
   ### Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
   
   #### Bug Severity
   
   - [ ] BLOCKER
   - [ ] Critical
   - [ ] Major
   - [X] Minor
   - [ ] Trivial
   
   ### Screenshots (if appropriate):
   
   ### How Has This Been Tested?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "blueorangutan (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
blueorangutan commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4512724808

   Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17971


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "codecov[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
codecov[bot] commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4512264734

   ## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) Report
   :white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
   :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 3.69%. Comparing base ([`d1e1aa5`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/commit/d1e1aa5d2035e46af01059315b98f290909969d4?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)) to head ([`c98b124`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/commit/c98b1249ee709399a2d09dcb256c0ec11f58c8a8?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)).
   > :exclamation:  There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (d1e1aa5) and HEAD (c98b124). Click for more details.
   > 
   > <details><summary>HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE</summary>
   >
   >| Flag | BASE (d1e1aa5) | HEAD (c98b124) |
   >|------|------|------|
   >|unittests|1|0|
   ></details>
   
   <details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
   
   
   
   ```diff
   @@              Coverage Diff              @@
   ##               4.22   #13212       +/-   ##
   =============================================
   - Coverage     17.67%    3.69%   -13.98%     
   =============================================
     Files          5922      448     -5474     
     Lines        533127    38105   -495022     
     Branches      65205     7059    -58146     
   =============================================
   - Hits          94243     1409    -92834     
   + Misses       428239    36509   -391730     
   + Partials      10645      187    -10458     
   ```
   
   | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | Coverage Δ | |
   |---|---|---|
   | [uitests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `3.69% <ø> (ø)` | |
   | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | `?` | |
   
   Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.
   </details>
   
   [:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).   
   :loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   <details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
   
   - :snowflake: [Test Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
   - :package: [JS Bundle Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
   </details>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "winterhazel (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
winterhazel commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4512254956

   @blueorangutan package


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "erikbocks (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
erikbocks commented on code in PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#discussion_r3313533484


##########
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java:
##########
@@ -2092,23 +2092,24 @@ protected void rebaseSnapshot(SnapshotObjectTO snapshotObjectTO, KVMStoragePool
 
         logger.debug("Rebasing snapshot [{}] with parent [{}].", snapshotName, parentSnapshotPath);
 
+        int snapshotTimeoutInMillis = wait * 1000;
         try {
-            QemuImg qemuImg = new QemuImg(wait);
+            QemuImg qemuImg = new QemuImg(snapshotTimeoutInMillis);
             qemuImg.rebase(snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile, PhysicalDiskFormat.QCOW2.toString(), false);
         } catch (LibvirtException | QemuImgException e) {
             if (!StringUtils.contains(e.getMessage(), "Is another process using the image")) {
                 logger.error("Exception while rebasing incremental snapshot [{}] due to: [{}].", snapshotName, e.getMessage(), e);
                 throw new CloudRuntimeException(e);
             }
-            retryRebase(snapshotName, wait, e, snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile);
+            retryRebase(snapshotName, snapshotTimeoutInMillis, e, snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile);
         }
     }
 
-    private void retryRebase(String snapshotName, int wait, Exception e, QemuImgFile snapshotFile, QemuImgFile parentSnapshotFile) {
+    private void retryRebase(String snapshotName, int waitInMilliseconds, Exception e, QemuImgFile snapshotFile, QemuImgFile parentSnapshotFile) {

Review Comment:
   Thanks for the advice. Implement it here and in #13210 (see https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13210#discussion_r3313530274).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "blueorangutan (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
blueorangutan commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4523801328

   <b>[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16163)</b>
   Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
   Total time taken: 55642 seconds
   Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr13212-t16163-kvm-ol8.zip
   Smoke tests completed. 149 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
   Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
   
   
   Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
   --- | --- | --- | ---
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "blueorangutan (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
blueorangutan commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4512258668

   @winterhazel a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with  KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "blueorangutan (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
blueorangutan commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4517461681

   @DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "winterhazel (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
winterhazel merged PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#issuecomment-4517450003

   @blueorangutan test


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Convert command's timeout for incremental snapshots [cloudstack]

Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on code in PR #13212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13212#discussion_r3287372535


##########
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java:
##########
@@ -2092,23 +2092,24 @@ protected void rebaseSnapshot(SnapshotObjectTO snapshotObjectTO, KVMStoragePool
 
         logger.debug("Rebasing snapshot [{}] with parent [{}].", snapshotName, parentSnapshotPath);
 
+        int snapshotTimeoutInMillis = wait * 1000;
         try {
-            QemuImg qemuImg = new QemuImg(wait);
+            QemuImg qemuImg = new QemuImg(snapshotTimeoutInMillis);
             qemuImg.rebase(snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile, PhysicalDiskFormat.QCOW2.toString(), false);
         } catch (LibvirtException | QemuImgException e) {
             if (!StringUtils.contains(e.getMessage(), "Is another process using the image")) {
                 logger.error("Exception while rebasing incremental snapshot [{}] due to: [{}].", snapshotName, e.getMessage(), e);
                 throw new CloudRuntimeException(e);
             }
-            retryRebase(snapshotName, wait, e, snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile);
+            retryRebase(snapshotName, snapshotTimeoutInMillis, e, snapshotFile, parentSnapshotFile);
         }
     }
 
-    private void retryRebase(String snapshotName, int wait, Exception e, QemuImgFile snapshotFile, QemuImgFile parentSnapshotFile) {
+    private void retryRebase(String snapshotName, int waitInMilliseconds, Exception e, QemuImgFile snapshotFile, QemuImgFile parentSnapshotFile) {

Review Comment:
   should this always fit in an int? 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org