You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/11/07 14:26:50 UTC
[jira] Created: (DERBY-2051) CachedItem's comments and code are
inconsistent wrt. syncronization
CachedItem's comments and code are inconsistent wrt. syncronization
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-2051
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2051
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation, Performance, Services
Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
Fix For: 10.3.0.0
The javadoc comment for CachedItem says that the state should only be accessed by the CacheManager, and that no synchronization is required. But a subset of the accessors/mutators are declared synchronized. If synchronization is unnecessary it should be removed to improve performance. If it is required, this should be properly explained in the comments.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2051) CachedItem's comments and code are
inconsistent wrt. syncronization
Posted by "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-2051:
---------------------------------
Derby Categories: [Performance]
> CachedItem's comments and code are inconsistent wrt. syncronization
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2051
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2051
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Services
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
> Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>
> The javadoc comment for CachedItem says that the state should only be accessed by the CacheManager, and that no synchronization is required. But a subset of the accessors/mutators are declared synchronized. If synchronization is unnecessary it should be removed to improve performance. If it is required, this should be properly explained in the comments.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-2051) CachedItem's comments and code are
inconsistent wrt. syncronization
Posted by "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-2051:
-----------------------------------------
Component/s: (was: Documentation)
I think documentation component is for user visible documentation.
> CachedItem's comments and code are inconsistent wrt. syncronization
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2051
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2051
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Performance, Services
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
> Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll
>
> The javadoc comment for CachedItem says that the state should only be accessed by the CacheManager, and that no synchronization is required. But a subset of the accessors/mutators are declared synchronized. If synchronization is unnecessary it should be removed to improve performance. If it is required, this should be properly explained in the comments.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.