[jira] Updated: (ISIS-9) Fixes to the Eclipse templates

["Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dan Haywood updated ISIS-9:
---------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 0.1.0-incubating

> Fixes to the Eclipse templates
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-9
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-9
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Kevin Meyer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> This was an email chain from Jul 2010 timeframe, against NOF 4.0.0.  Kevin had the proposed changes, I've assigned to him.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
> Sounds like those are the right templates then (there hasn't been any updates to em). I'll check it out, but if you reckon there's a bug and you have a fix, then go ahead and commit the changes (somewhere under trunk/distribution, if i remember right).
> Thanks,
> Dan
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 28 Jul 2010, at 11:28, "Kevin Meyer" <ke...@kmz.co.za> wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > > 
> >> >> Yes, the parent should do the work, and the child delegate to it. It's
> >> >> called the mutual registration pattern.
> > > 
> > > That is what I understood. I wanted to confirm with you as I was seeing
> > > some funny behaviour.
> > > 
> >> >> In your email you talk about the 'template' in the singular, but actually
> >> >> there are several templates available (I'm assuming you are using the ones
> >> >> I describe in my book?).
> > > 
> > > I'm using the templates I fetched from the NOF
> > > "/distribution/tarball/.../ide/eclipse/templates" directory.
> > > I should compare them to the ones in your book...
> > > 
> >> >> I don't think that there are any bugs in them; rob says he's been using
> >> >> them ok (though I think he trimmed them down a bit).
> > > 
> > > The issue that I have with the 'noc-1m' "1:m parent" association
> > > template is that following two lines are the wrong way around?:
> > >    // associate arg
> > >    childElementName.setParentPropertyNameInChild(this);
> > >    getChildCollectionName().add(childElementName);
> > > 
> > > Since, if the child method "setParentPropertyNameInChild(this)"
> > > delegates to the parent (e.g. contains
> > > "parentObject.addToChildCollectionName(this)") then you've got
> > > an infinite recursion taking place - the child item is not yet
> > > in the parent collection, when the parent calls the child... :-o
> > > 
> > > AFAIK, There is no equivalent child template ('nocmod' assumes no
> > > parent?).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.