[jira] Closed: (LEGAL-43) DOM4J license

["Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-43.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

svn ci -m "Adding PHP (LEGAL-47) and DOM4J (LEGAL-43) licenses" xdocs/legal/resolved.xml docs/legal/resolved.html 
Sending        docs/legal/resolved.html
Sending        xdocs/legal/resolved.xml
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 794974.

> DOM4J license
> -------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-43
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-43
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>
> The DOM4J library (http://www.dom4j.org/) is available under a BSD-style license (http://www.dom4j.org/dom4j-1.6.1/license.html) that contains the following clause:
>     5. Due credit should be given to the DOM4J Project - http://www.dom4j.org
> Should this be interpreted similarly as the advertising clause in the original BSD license? This clause seems weaker than the original advertising clause, but given the concerns of OSI-compatibility of such clauses I would like to better understand our position on this.
> Can an Apache project include the DOM4J library in a release? If yes, what would constitute the required "due credit"?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org