You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> on 2012/03/12 11:41:26 UTC
Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Hi,
as part of our release process we have to review all open issues (STANBOL-273).
Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
list for our release.
Best,
- Fabian
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Enrico Daga <en...@gmail.com>.
On 15 March 2012 21:23, Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you don't have to change anything for those issues. The
> request was to update issues which are resolved or obsolete but not
> marked as such. So having open issues is totally fine.
>
> Demos are not part of the 0.9.0 release anyway.
>
> If you won't have time to work on issues assigned to you, you could
> also remove the assignment to indicate this status.
Thank you Fabian for clarifying this.
best,
Enrico
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> Am 15. März 2012 21:03 schrieb Enrico Daga <en...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> I quickly reviewed the issues assigned to me.
>> Unfortunatly this period I cannot be much involved on Stanbol.
>> There are three issues which cannot be fixed today (at least not by
>> me), but that does not affect the actual state of the releasable code:
>>
>> STANBOL-378 and STANBOL-249 refer to the integrity check demo, which
>> got unstable after some changes in the REST services due to a natural
>> evolution of the components. This demo is not part of the release.
>> Should I mark them as LATER?
>>
>> STANBOL-386 refers to an evolution of the Commons Jobs component,
>> needed in the future but not possible today (at least not by me).
>> Should I also mark this as LATER?
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> (and thank you guys for your work on this release)
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> This issue refer to a useful improvements that cannot be done before the release
>>
>> On 15 March 2012 17:31, Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 for moving reengineer to contrib
>>>
>>> Am 15. März 2012 17:23 schrieb Alessandro Adamou <ad...@cs.unibo.it>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> how about moving reengineer to the contrib directory too? since there's no
>>>> plan for maintaining it at the moment, it could safely stay in the trunk,
>>>> only it wouldn't be in the source release (after all it's not being built by
>>>> default) and its open tickets would be a lesser problem.
>>>>
>>>> This would also allow us to knock off the kres launcher and profile for good
>>>> and close STANBOL-177.
>>>>
>>>> wdyt?
>>>>
>>>> Alessandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/15/12 1:47 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
>>>>> issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
>>>>>
>>>>> For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open
>>>>> issues
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
>>>>>
>>>>> Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian
>>>>> Christ<ch...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues
>>>>>> (STANBOL-273).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
>>>>>> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
>>>>>> list for our release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fabian
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
>>>>
>>>> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
>>>> Department of Computer Science
>>>> Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
>>>>
>>>> Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
>>>> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
>>>> National Research Council (CNR)
>>>> Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "I will give you everything, so long as you do not demand anything."
>>>> (Ettore Petrolini, 1930)
>>>>
>>>> Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian
>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Enrico Daga
>>
>> --
>> http://www.enridaga.net
>> skype: enri-pan
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
Enrico Daga
--
http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I think you don't have to change anything for those issues. The
request was to update issues which are resolved or obsolete but not
marked as such. So having open issues is totally fine.
Demos are not part of the 0.9.0 release anyway.
If you won't have time to work on issues assigned to you, you could
also remove the assignment to indicate this status.
Best,
- Fabian
Am 15. März 2012 21:03 schrieb Enrico Daga <en...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
> I quickly reviewed the issues assigned to me.
> Unfortunatly this period I cannot be much involved on Stanbol.
> There are three issues which cannot be fixed today (at least not by
> me), but that does not affect the actual state of the releasable code:
>
> STANBOL-378 and STANBOL-249 refer to the integrity check demo, which
> got unstable after some changes in the REST services due to a natural
> evolution of the components. This demo is not part of the release.
> Should I mark them as LATER?
>
> STANBOL-386 refers to an evolution of the Commons Jobs component,
> needed in the future but not possible today (at least not by me).
> Should I also mark this as LATER?
>
> wdyt?
>
> (and thank you guys for your work on this release)
>
> Enrico
>
> This issue refer to a useful improvements that cannot be done before the release
>
> On 15 March 2012 17:31, Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> +1 for moving reengineer to contrib
>>
>> Am 15. März 2012 17:23 schrieb Alessandro Adamou <ad...@cs.unibo.it>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> how about moving reengineer to the contrib directory too? since there's no
>>> plan for maintaining it at the moment, it could safely stay in the trunk,
>>> only it wouldn't be in the source release (after all it's not being built by
>>> default) and its open tickets would be a lesser problem.
>>>
>>> This would also allow us to knock off the kres launcher and profile for good
>>> and close STANBOL-177.
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>> Alessandro
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/15/12 1:47 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
>>>> issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
>>>>
>>>> For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open
>>>> issues
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
>>>>
>>>> Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Fabian
>>>>
>>>> Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian
>>>> Christ<ch...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues
>>>>> (STANBOL-273).
>>>>>
>>>>> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
>>>>> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
>>>>> list for our release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> - Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fabian
>>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
>>>
>>> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
>>> Department of Computer Science
>>> Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
>>>
>>> Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
>>> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
>>> National Research Council (CNR)
>>> Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
>>>
>>>
>>> "I will give you everything, so long as you do not demand anything."
>>> (Ettore Petrolini, 1930)
>>>
>>> Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabian
>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>
>
>
> --
> Enrico Daga
>
> --
> http://www.enridaga.net
> skype: enri-pan
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Enrico Daga <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I quickly reviewed the issues assigned to me.
Unfortunatly this period I cannot be much involved on Stanbol.
There are three issues which cannot be fixed today (at least not by
me), but that does not affect the actual state of the releasable code:
STANBOL-378 and STANBOL-249 refer to the integrity check demo, which
got unstable after some changes in the REST services due to a natural
evolution of the components. This demo is not part of the release.
Should I mark them as LATER?
STANBOL-386 refers to an evolution of the Commons Jobs component,
needed in the future but not possible today (at least not by me).
Should I also mark this as LATER?
wdyt?
(and thank you guys for your work on this release)
Enrico
This issue refer to a useful improvements that cannot be done before the release
On 15 March 2012 17:31, Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1 for moving reengineer to contrib
>
> Am 15. März 2012 17:23 schrieb Alessandro Adamou <ad...@cs.unibo.it>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> how about moving reengineer to the contrib directory too? since there's no
>> plan for maintaining it at the moment, it could safely stay in the trunk,
>> only it wouldn't be in the source release (after all it's not being built by
>> default) and its open tickets would be a lesser problem.
>>
>> This would also allow us to knock off the kres launcher and profile for good
>> and close STANBOL-177.
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Alessandro
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/15/12 1:47 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
>>> issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
>>>
>>> For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open
>>> issues
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
>>>
>>> Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> - Fabian
>>>
>>> Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian
>>> Christ<ch...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues
>>>> (STANBOL-273).
>>>>
>>>> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
>>>> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
>>>> list for our release.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> - Fabian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabian
>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
>>
>> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
>> Department of Computer Science
>> Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
>>
>> Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
>> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
>> National Research Council (CNR)
>> Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
>>
>>
>> "I will give you everything, so long as you do not demand anything."
>> (Ettore Petrolini, 1930)
>>
>> Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
Enrico Daga
--
http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan
Re: JSON-LD @coerce is deprecated
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Dear Michel,
thanks for pointing to this. Can you open an issue in JIRA for this?
I'm sure it will be fixed then.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL
Best,
- Fabian
Am 15. März 2012 20:51 schrieb Michel Benevento <mb...@kanker.nl>:
> I noticed you added it just a couple of months ago, but in the latest (as of ±3 months ago) JSON-LD spec @coerce doesn't appear anymore. My parser has already removed support for it, so it trips over Stanbol's output now... Can this be made compliant again?
>
>
> Brgds,
> Michel
>
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
JSON-LD @coerce is deprecated
Posted by Michel Benevento <mb...@kanker.nl>.
I noticed you added it just a couple of months ago, but in the latest (as of ±3 months ago) JSON-LD spec @coerce doesn't appear anymore. My parser has already removed support for it, so it trips over Stanbol's output now... Can this be made compliant again?
Brgds,
Michel
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
+1 for moving reengineer to contrib
Am 15. März 2012 17:23 schrieb Alessandro Adamou <ad...@cs.unibo.it>:
> Hi,
>
> how about moving reengineer to the contrib directory too? since there's no
> plan for maintaining it at the moment, it could safely stay in the trunk,
> only it wouldn't be in the source release (after all it's not being built by
> default) and its open tickets would be a lesser problem.
>
> This would also allow us to knock off the kres launcher and profile for good
> and close STANBOL-177.
>
> wdyt?
>
> Alessandro
>
>
>
> On 3/15/12 1:47 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
>> issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
>>
>> For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open
>> issues
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
>>
>> Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
>>
>> Best,
>> - Fabian
>>
>> Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian
>> Christ<ch...@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues
>>> (STANBOL-273).
>>>
>>> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
>>> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
>>> list for our release.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> - Fabian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian
>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
>
> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
> Department of Computer Science
> Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
>
> Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
> National Research Council (CNR)
> Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
>
>
> "I will give you everything, so long as you do not demand anything."
> (Ettore Petrolini, 1930)
>
> Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
>
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Alessandro Adamou <ad...@cs.unibo.it>.
Hi,
how about moving reengineer to the contrib directory too? since there's
no plan for maintaining it at the moment, it could safely stay in the
trunk, only it wouldn't be in the source release (after all it's not
being built by default) and its open tickets would be a lesser problem.
This would also allow us to knock off the kres launcher and profile for
good and close STANBOL-177.
wdyt?
Alessandro
On 3/15/12 1:47 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
> issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
>
> For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open issues
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
>
> Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian Christ<ch...@googlemail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues (STANBOL-273).
>>
>> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
>> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
>> list for our release.
>>
>> Best,
>> - Fabian
>>
>> --
>> Fabian
>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>
>
--
M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Department of Computer Science
Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
National Research Council (CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
"I will give you everything, so long as you do not demand anything."
(Ettore Petrolini, 1930)
Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
Re: Review Open Issues for the 0.9.0 Release
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I did not see any progress on this issue yet. Please, review the
issues in JIRA and update their status ASAP.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-273
For a list of open issues you can use this filter which shows 132 open issues
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12315012
Search for outdated and obsolete issues.
Best,
- Fabian
Am 12. März 2012 11:41 schrieb Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> as part of our release process we have to review all open issues (STANBOL-273).
>
> Please, check your issues and update their status. It seems like there
> are many issues that could be set to resolved. We need an up-to-date
> list for our release.
>
> Best,
> - Fabian
>
> --
> Fabian
> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt