You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Yoram Arnon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/04/22 00:58:05 UTC

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-159) name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications

name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications
----------------------------------------------------

         Key: HADOOP-159
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159
     Project: Hadoop
        Type: Bug

  Components: dfs  
    Versions: 0.1.1    
    Reporter: Yoram Arnon
 Assigned to: Sameer Paranjpye 
    Priority: Blocker
     Fix For: 0.2


some hours after adding some new nodes to the cluster, the name node went into a state where it's consuming 100% cpu.
The log file keeps logging messages of the forms
060421 155049 Obsoleting block blk_8093115169359854355
060421 155049 Pending transfer (block blk_-6965677235456960523) from node1383:50010 to 2 destinations
060421 155049 Block report from node1283:50010: 2140 blocks.
060421 155049 Redundant addStoredBlock request received for block blk_-6836937139917042917 on node node1143:50010

many DFS operations time out, making useful work impossible.

restarting dfs solved the problem for a while, but it came back within an hour.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-159) name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications

Posted by "Sameer Paranjpye (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159?page=comments#action_12377265 ] 

Sameer Paranjpye commented on HADOOP-159:
-----------------------------------------

Is this problem still seen? Some of the committed patches appear to have resolved this issue, no?

> name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: HADOOP-159
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159
>      Project: Hadoop
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: dfs
>     Versions: 0.1.1
>     Reporter: Yoram Arnon
>     Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 0.2

>
> some hours after adding some new nodes to the cluster, the name node went into a state where it's consuming 100% cpu.
> The log file keeps logging messages of the forms
> 060421 155049 Obsoleting block blk_8093115169359854355
> 060421 155049 Pending transfer (block blk_-6965677235456960523) from node1383:50010 to 2 destinations
> 060421 155049 Block report from node1283:50010: 2140 blocks.
> 060421 155049 Redundant addStoredBlock request received for block blk_-6836937139917042917 on node node1143:50010
> many DFS operations time out, making useful work impossible.
> restarting dfs solved the problem for a while, but it came back within an hour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-159) name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications

Posted by "Sameer Paranjpye (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159?page=all ]
     
Sameer Paranjpye resolved HADOOP-159:
-------------------------------------

    Fix Version: 0.2
                     (was: 0.3)
     Resolution: Duplicate

Looks like HADOOP-178 addresses this. Let's monitor and re-open if it manifests again.

> name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: HADOOP-159
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159
>      Project: Hadoop
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: dfs
>     Versions: 0.1.1
>     Reporter: Yoram Arnon
>     Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 0.2

>
> some hours after adding some new nodes to the cluster, the name node went into a state where it's consuming 100% cpu.
> The log file keeps logging messages of the forms
> 060421 155049 Obsoleting block blk_8093115169359854355
> 060421 155049 Pending transfer (block blk_-6965677235456960523) from node1383:50010 to 2 destinations
> 060421 155049 Block report from node1283:50010: 2140 blocks.
> 060421 155049 Redundant addStoredBlock request received for block blk_-6836937139917042917 on node node1143:50010
> many DFS operations time out, making useful work impossible.
> restarting dfs solved the problem for a while, but it came back within an hour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-159) name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications

Posted by "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159?page=all ]

Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-159:
--------------------------------

    Fix Version: 0.3
                     (was: 0.2)

> name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: HADOOP-159
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159
>      Project: Hadoop
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: dfs
>     Versions: 0.1.1
>     Reporter: Yoram Arnon
>     Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 0.3

>
> some hours after adding some new nodes to the cluster, the name node went into a state where it's consuming 100% cpu.
> The log file keeps logging messages of the forms
> 060421 155049 Obsoleting block blk_8093115169359854355
> 060421 155049 Pending transfer (block blk_-6965677235456960523) from node1383:50010 to 2 destinations
> 060421 155049 Block report from node1283:50010: 2140 blocks.
> 060421 155049 Redundant addStoredBlock request received for block blk_-6836937139917042917 on node node1143:50010
> many DFS operations time out, making useful work impossible.
> restarting dfs solved the problem for a while, but it came back within an hour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-159) name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications

Posted by "Yoram Arnon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159?page=comments#action_12377280 ] 

Yoram Arnon commented on HADOOP-159:
------------------------------------

It was observed just twice, in the same timeframe.

I'm not aware of any patches that attempt to address this. Logging was added though.
Let's wait a while before closing, unless there's a specific fix.

> name node at 100% cpu, making redundant replications
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: HADOOP-159
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-159
>      Project: Hadoop
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: dfs
>     Versions: 0.1.1
>     Reporter: Yoram Arnon
>     Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 0.2

>
> some hours after adding some new nodes to the cluster, the name node went into a state where it's consuming 100% cpu.
> The log file keeps logging messages of the forms
> 060421 155049 Obsoleting block blk_8093115169359854355
> 060421 155049 Pending transfer (block blk_-6965677235456960523) from node1383:50010 to 2 destinations
> 060421 155049 Block report from node1283:50010: 2140 blocks.
> 060421 155049 Redundant addStoredBlock request received for block blk_-6836937139917042917 on node node1143:50010
> many DFS operations time out, making useful work impossible.
> restarting dfs solved the problem for a while, but it came back within an hour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira