You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/06 06:59:58 UTC
[VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
available to evaluate for release quality.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
It has also been deployed to m2-snapshot-repository with signatures
for the jars and poms.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease135
The original vote thread can be viewed here:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23710.html
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
While only votes from Struts PMC members are binding, all community
members are encouraged to evaluate and provide feedback on this build.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Paul Benedict <pa...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks Ted. I understand better now. I still think 1.3.5 is great!
Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote: On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I
>was.... ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually
invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so.
* http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict <pa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I
>was.... ::scratches head::.
It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually
invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so.
* http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Paul Benedict <pa...@yahoo.com>.
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I was.... ::scratches head::.
Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
> available to evaluate for release quality.
[RESULT]
This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in:
Binding votes from PMC members:
GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell
Beta: Wendy Smoak, James Holmes
Non-binding votes:
GA: Anders Steinlein, Paul Benedict
Struts 1.3.5 can therefore be released as Beta quality.
I'll work on getting the distribution out onto the mirrors and ibiblio
today, and post the announcement to user@ once everything is in place.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
> available to evaluate for release quality.
[RESULT]
This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in:
Binding votes from PMC members:
GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell
Beta: Wendy Smoak, James Holmes
Non-binding votes:
GA: Anders Steinlein, Paul Benedict
Struts 1.3.5 can therefore be released as Beta quality.
I'll work on getting the distribution out onto the mirrors and ibiblio
today, and post the announcement to user@ once everything is in place.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Doh! I couldn't remember if I had sent that in.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
> On 8/11/06, James Mitchell <ja...@mac.com> wrote:
>> +1 GA -- Looks great!!!
>
> LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
>
> As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
>
> Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote,
> binding or not.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Anders Steinlein <an...@steinlein.no>.
+1 GA non-binding. Been using 1.3.5 successfully in my app.
\Anders
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ted.husted@gmail.com [mailto:ted.husted@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Ted Husted
> Sent: 11. august 2006 15:07
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
>
> On 8/11/06, James Mitchell <ja...@mac.com> wrote:
> > +1 GA -- Looks great!!!
>
> LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
>
> As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
>
> Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited
> to vote, binding or not.
>
> -Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell <ja...@mac.com> wrote:
> +1 GA -- Looks great!!!
LOL. No fair voting twice, James :)
As it stands, we have two beta and two GA.
Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote,
binding or not.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by James Mitchell <ja...@mac.com>.
+1 GA -- Looks great!!!
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is
> available to evaluate for release quality.
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/
>
> It has also been deployed to m2-snapshot-repository with signatures
> for the jars and poms.
>
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
> * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease135
>
> The original vote thread can be viewed here:
> * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23710.html
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> While only votes from Struts PMC members are binding, all community
> members are encouraged to evaluate and provide feedback on this build.
>
> --
> Wendy Smoak
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Finally had a chance to go through this.
+1 for GA
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Don Brown wrote:
> +1 for GA
>
> Don
>
> Wendy Smoak wrote:
>> On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [X] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> Same reasons as before. :)
>> * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
>> This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into
>> production the next time I do an update.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
+1 for GA
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Same reasons as before. :)
> * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
>
> This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into
> production the next time I do an update.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com>.
+1 Beta
-----Original Message-----
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:wsmoak@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into
production the next time I do an update.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Same reasons as before. :)
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html
This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into
production the next time I do an update.
--
Wendy Smoak
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org