jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

[Edgar Poce <ed...@gmail.com>]

> On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My question was more about the eventual plan for the navigator
> app than making immediate decisions. Let's revisit the issue later.

In a mid term plan I think we could include both the navigator and the
webdav server in a single webapp. If it's not a hard task for the
release manager the jcr-server could be distributed also separately in
its own war.

probably dreaming from here :), but in a not so long term it would be
great to have a single war that includes the webdav server, the jcr
navigator, a jackrabbit monitoring tool (to monitor the internals),
and some kind of audit trail app that contains aggregated and detailed
log of read/write operations. IMHO such a distribution would be great
:). New users often have little time to evaluate the tools and an easy
to install distribution would help a lot.

br,
edgar

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

[Edgar Poce <ed...@gmail.com>]

On 11/23/06, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/23/06, David Nuescheler <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com .
> > We'd be happy contribute that to jackrabbit if everybody thinks
> > that this would make sense. Generally, I think that most
> > of the other web-ui features that we package into CRX
> > could also make sense for Jackrabbit.
>
> With my Jackrabbit PMC chair hat on, I'd definitely welcome such a contribution!
>

sound great, +1 from me.

br,
edgar

> Jackrabbit is currently lacking in management tools and the CRX tools
> combined with Edgar's and other people's work would be a major leap
> forward.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 11/23/06, David Nuescheler <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com .
> We'd be happy contribute that to jackrabbit if everybody thinks
> that this would make sense. Generally, I think that most
> of the other web-ui features that we package into CRX
> could also make sense for Jackrabbit.

With my Jackrabbit PMC chair hat on, I'd definitely welcome such a contribution!

Jackrabbit is currently lacking in management tools and the CRX tools
combined with Edgar's and other people's work would be a major leap
forward.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

[David Nuescheler <da...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

since we ship our CRX product packaged as a .war file for
quite a while we built some helpers to allow us to have
the JCR explorer, WebDAV and a couple of other features
packaged into a single webapp.

You can see some of that running on http://jcr.day.com .
We'd be happy contribute that to jackrabbit if everybody thinks
that this would make sense. Generally, I think that most
of the other web-ui features that we package into CRX
could also make sense for Jackrabbit.

regards,
david

On 11/22/06, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <ed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > probably dreaming from here :), but in a not so long term it would be
> > great to have a single war that includes the webdav server, the jcr
> > navigator, a jackrabbit monitoring tool (to monitor the internals),
> > and some kind of audit trail app that contains aggregated and detailed
> > log of read/write operations. IMHO such a distribution would be great
> > :). New users often have little time to evaluate the tools and an easy
> > to install distribution would help a lot.
>
> +1
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Re: jackrabbit war distribution (was: web based jcr browser contribution)

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On 11/21/06, Edgar Poce <ed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> probably dreaming from here :), but in a not so long term it would be
> great to have a single war that includes the webdav server, the jcr
> navigator, a jackrabbit monitoring tool (to monitor the internals),
> and some kind of audit trail app that contains aggregated and detailed
> log of read/write operations. IMHO such a distribution would be great
> :). New users often have little time to evaluate the tools and an easy
> to install distribution would help a lot.

+1

BR,

Jukka Zitting