You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/29 11:21:45 UTC
[VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the third release
candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
*hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have been
addressed in this release.
1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
0.0.1.incubating.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
PPMC Vote thread :
http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
Vote Result :
http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
The tag to be voted upon:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
PGP keys used to sign the release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
regards,
Rahul
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mirko,
Thanks for voting again :) Your vote made us pass the PPMC vote ! I started
the IPMC vote on general@i.a.o and just keeping the dev list in loop. I am
hoping that we should be able to sail through it this time.
regards,
Rahul
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Mirko Kämpf <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Mirko
>
>
>
> 2013/11/29 Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> > (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> > mailing list and the community has approved the third release
> > candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
> > 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
> > *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have
> been
> > addressed in this release.
> >
> > 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
> > Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> > 0.0.1.incubating.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > PPMC Vote thread :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
> >
> > Vote Result :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
> >
> > PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
> >
> > Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
> >
> > regards,
> > Rahul
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by Mirko Kämpf <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1
Mirko
2013/11/29 Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> mailing list and the community has approved the third release
> candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
> 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
> *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have been
> addressed in this release.
>
> 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
> Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> 0.0.1.incubating.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> PPMC Vote thread :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
>
> Vote Result :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
>
> PGP keys used to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
>
> Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
>
> regards,
> Rahul
>
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
The Vote is already 4 days old and we still require 2 more votes from the
IPMC.
regards
Rahul
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> mailing list and the community has approved the third release
> candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
> 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
> *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have been
> addressed in this release.
>
> 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
> Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> 0.0.1.incubating.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> PPMC Vote thread :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
>
> Vote Result :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
>
> PGP keys used to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
>
> Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
>
> regards,
> Rahul
>
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 4 December 2013 03:29, Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Sebb for explaining out in detail, since this is our first release I
> think we would require some guidance. We would fix the LICENSE and the
> NOTICE but there a few questions, in the same regard.
>
> This an eclipse plugin so we are using other Eclipse libs like EMF[1].
> These are based on EPL. The libs are not shipped because the eclipse
> runtime environment takes care of them. Do they need a mention in the
> LICENSE/NOTICE ?
As I already wrote, only bits that are *included* in a distribution
need to be mentioned in the relevant N&L.
> Also the project is build using Tycho[2], does it require to mention the
> same in LICENSE/NOTICE ?
See above.
You can / should mention these external requirements somewhere, e.g.
in a README or BUILDING file.
Note that there are some restrictions on 3rd party dependencies --
whether included or not.
See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
But the N&L files are only about *included* bits.
[Your mentors should really have been able to guide you on this, but I
see that only one bothered to vote on the podling list.]
> regards,
> Rahul
>
> [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Modeling_Framework
> [2]http://www.sonatype.org/tycho/license
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
>> > (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
>> > mailing list and the community has approved the third release
>> > candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
>> > 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
>> > *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have
>> been
>> > addressed in this release.
>> >
>> > 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
>> > Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
>> > 0.0.1.incubating.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
>> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >
>> > PPMC Vote thread :
>> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
>> >
>> > Vote Result :
>> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
>> >
>> > Source and binary files:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted upon:
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
>>
>> NOTICE says:
>>
>> This product includes Eclipse Icons from
>> http://tech.joelbecker.net/articles/resources/5-eclipseicons - Eclipse
>> Public License v 1.0
>>
>> However the LICENSE file does not include the EPL.
>>
>> I think this is a blocker; any 3rd party inclusions must be
>> accompanied by their license, either in the LICENSE file or as a
>> separate file referenced from the LICENSE file. [The end user must be
>> able to find the licenses easily, not go searching through directory
>> trees].
>>
>> Without knowing the text of the EPL, it's not possible to determine
>> whether there also needs to be a mention in the NOTICE file (the
>> LICENSE may be sufficient) It's vital that the NOTICE file only has
>> required elements in it; unnecessary content must be removed [1]
>>
>> The binary archive contains some 3rd party libraries; these need to be
>> mentioned in the embedded LICENSE and perhaps the NOTICE file.
>>
>> I noticed SLF4J - are there any others?
>>
>> This is another blocker, IMO.
>>
>> Note that the NOTICE & LICENSE files must relate to the distribution
>> to which they belong; generally this means that the ones in the source
>> archive match the ones at the top-level of SCM (i.e. git here); the
>> binary archive may require additional entries in LICENSE and possibly
>> NOTICE.
>>
>> Also the word "Devlopment" appears in at least one NOTICE file as part
>> of the product name. Is that really the correct product name?
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>
>> > PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
>> >
>> > Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
>> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Rahul
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Sebb for explaining out in detail, since this is our first release I
think we would require some guidance. We would fix the LICENSE and the
NOTICE but there a few questions, in the same regard.
This an eclipse plugin so we are using other Eclipse libs like EMF[1].
These are based on EPL. The libs are not shipped because the eclipse
runtime environment takes care of them. Do they need a mention in the
LICENSE/NOTICE ?
Also the project is build using Tycho[2], does it require to mention the
same in LICENSE/NOTICE ?
regards,
Rahul
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Modeling_Framework
[2]http://www.sonatype.org/tycho/license
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:49 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> > (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> > mailing list and the community has approved the third release
> > candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
> > 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
> > *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have
> been
> > addressed in this release.
> >
> > 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
> > Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> > 0.0.1.incubating.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > PPMC Vote thread :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
> >
> > Vote Result :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
> >
> > Source and binary files:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
>
> NOTICE says:
>
> This product includes Eclipse Icons from
> http://tech.joelbecker.net/articles/resources/5-eclipseicons - Eclipse
> Public License v 1.0
>
> However the LICENSE file does not include the EPL.
>
> I think this is a blocker; any 3rd party inclusions must be
> accompanied by their license, either in the LICENSE file or as a
> separate file referenced from the LICENSE file. [The end user must be
> able to find the licenses easily, not go searching through directory
> trees].
>
> Without knowing the text of the EPL, it's not possible to determine
> whether there also needs to be a mention in the NOTICE file (the
> LICENSE may be sufficient) It's vital that the NOTICE file only has
> required elements in it; unnecessary content must be removed [1]
>
> The binary archive contains some 3rd party libraries; these need to be
> mentioned in the embedded LICENSE and perhaps the NOTICE file.
>
> I noticed SLF4J - are there any others?
>
> This is another blocker, IMO.
>
> Note that the NOTICE & LICENSE files must relate to the distribution
> to which they belong; generally this means that the ones in the source
> archive match the ones at the top-level of SCM (i.e. git here); the
> binary archive may require additional entries in LICENSE and possibly
> NOTICE.
>
> Also the word "Devlopment" appears in at least one NOTICE file as part
> of the product name. Is that really the correct product name?
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
> > PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
> >
> > Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
> >
> > regards,
> > Rahul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release HDT version 0.0.1.incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> (incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
> mailing list and the community has approved the third release
> candidate(RC2) for Apache Hadoop Development Tools (incubating), version
> 0.0.1.incubating.The release has Zookeper and HDFS features from the
> *hadoop-eclipse-merge* codebase.The issues raised for RC0 and RC1 have been
> addressed in this release.
>
> 1 IPMC votes have already been cast:
> Roman Shaposhnik (mentor)
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hadoop Development Tools
> 0.0.1.incubating.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HDT 0.0.1.incubating
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> PPMC Vote thread :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/sqerudh5emqzqfrg
>
> Vote Result :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/rvskqqernk4fmumt
>
> Source and binary files:
> http://people.apache.org/~rsharma/hdt-0.0.1.incubating-rc2/
>
> The tag to be voted upon:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-hdt.git;a=commit;h=02f75eda16a8b91f0b35abad9487a9c83fd4c8d6
NOTICE says:
This product includes Eclipse Icons from
http://tech.joelbecker.net/articles/resources/5-eclipseicons - Eclipse
Public License v 1.0
However the LICENSE file does not include the EPL.
I think this is a blocker; any 3rd party inclusions must be
accompanied by their license, either in the LICENSE file or as a
separate file referenced from the LICENSE file. [The end user must be
able to find the licenses easily, not go searching through directory
trees].
Without knowing the text of the EPL, it's not possible to determine
whether there also needs to be a mention in the NOTICE file (the
LICENSE may be sufficient) It's vital that the NOTICE file only has
required elements in it; unnecessary content must be removed [1]
The binary archive contains some 3rd party libraries; these need to be
mentioned in the embedded LICENSE and perhaps the NOTICE file.
I noticed SLF4J - are there any others?
This is another blocker, IMO.
Note that the NOTICE & LICENSE files must relate to the distribution
to which they belong; generally this means that the ones in the source
archive match the ones at the top-level of SCM (i.e. git here); the
binary archive may require additional entries in LICENSE and possibly
NOTICE.
Also the word "Devlopment" appears in at least one NOTICE file as part
of the product name. Is that really the correct product name?
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> PGP keys used to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hdt/KEYS
>
> Some guideline to verify release can be found at :
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/qj3srhvozapbwmq6
>
> regards,
> Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org