[jira] [Closed] (AIRFLOW-332) Documentation says Sub-DAG names follow a convention, but in reality it's enforced

["Daniel Imberman (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Daniel Imberman closed AIRFLOW-332.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Auto Closed

> Documentation says Sub-DAG names follow a convention, but in reality it's enforced
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-332
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-332
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: operators
>            Reporter: Jon McKenzie
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the documentation states that a Sub-DAG's name should follow the convention {{<parent_dag_id>.<sub_dag_id>}}. In reality, this is not just a convention, but it is enforced, and a {{SubDagOperator}} will fail to load if its name is incorrect. The documentation should be updated to be a little clearer in this regard.
> Ideally, it would also be nice to either specify via an option that this validation should take place (or not), or be easier to subclass {{SubDagOperator}} and override the validation, so that users can have their own naming conventions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)