You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by "Michael Watzek (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/03/01 12:13:44 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JDO-311) Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO
implementation supports "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311?page=comments#action_12368259 ]
Michael Watzek commented on JDO-311:
------------------------------------
I agree with 1. above.
The removal of the package prefix in 2. above is consistent with other TCK test cases: All calls of method "printUnsupportedOptionalFeatureNotTested" in TCK test classes pass a non-qualified classnames. For this reason, I propose to pass a non-qualified classname here either, or to adapt the calls in other TCK test cases as well.
Please let me know how to proceed.
> Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-311
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Versions: JDO 2 beta
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Assignee: Michael Watzek
> Fix For: JDO 2 final
> Attachments: JDO-311.patch
>
> The inheritance3 test should check whether PMF.supportedOptions contains "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable" before running the test. JPOX doesn't support this option yet the test still runs (and fails)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira