You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/05/26 18:33:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (DRILL-8237) Limit is not pushed down to scan for MSSQL

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17542631#comment-17542631 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-8237:
---------------------------------------

vvysotskyi opened a new pull request, #2564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2564

   # [DRILL-8237](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8237): Limit is not pushed down to scan for MSSQL
   
   ## Description
   Adjusted the cost of `DrillJdbcSort` to handle the case when the original limit was split
   
   ## Documentation
   NA
   
   ## Testing
   All unit tests passed, enabled disabled test which is fixed with these changes.
   




> Limit is not pushed down to scan for MSSQL
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-8237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-8237
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vova Vysotskyi
>            Assignee: Vova Vysotskyi
>            Priority: Major
>
> [~dzamo] has noticed that the following test case will fail
> {code:java}
>   @Test
>   public void testLimitPushDownWithOffset() throws Exception {
>     String query = "select person_id, first_name from mssql.dbo.person limit 100 offset 10";
>     queryBuilder()
>       .sql(query)
>       .planMatcher()
>       .include("Jdbc\\(.*SELECT TOP \\(110\\)")
>       .include("Limit\\(")
>       .match();
>   }
> {code}
> because the limit wasn't pushed down.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)