You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Josh Rosen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/07 23:42:03 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-22983) Don't push filters beneath
aggregates with empty grouping expressions
Josh Rosen created SPARK-22983:
----------------------------------
Summary: Don't push filters beneath aggregates with empty grouping expressions
Key: SPARK-22983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22983
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.1.0, 2.3.0
Reporter: Josh Rosen
Assignee: Josh Rosen
Priority: Critical
The following SQL query should return zero rows, but in Spark it actually returns one row:
{code}
SELECT 1 from (
SELECT 1 AS z,
MIN(a.x)
FROM (select 1 as x) a
WHERE false
) b
where b.z != b.z
{code}
The problem stems from the `PushDownPredicate` rule: when this rule encounters a filter on top of an Aggregate operator, e.g. `Filter(Agg(...))`, it removes the original filter and adds a new filter onto Aggregate's child, e.g. `Agg(Filter(...))`. This is often okay, but the case above is a counterexample: because there is no explicit `GROUP BY`, we are implicitly computing a global aggregate over the entire table so the original filter was not acting like a `HAVING` clause filtering the number of groups: if we push this filter then it fails to actually reduce the cardinality of the Aggregate output, leading to the wrong answer.
A simple fix is to never push down filters beneath aggregates when there are no grouping expressions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org