You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/07 01:10:49 UTC

[VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.

This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
repository, and RAT report are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a

The tag for the release is at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/

KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS

The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx

Many thanks,

   ...ant

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 07/04/2008, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>
>  This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
>  artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
>  repository, and RAT report are at:
>  http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a

    http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-RC4a/

works better ;-)

>  The tag for the release is at:
>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>
>  KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
>  The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
>  http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>
>  Many thanks,
>
>
>    ...ant
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Been traveling. Here's my belated +1

--kevan
On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote:

> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>
> This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> repository, and RAT report are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
>
> The tag for the release is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>
> KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
> The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>
> Many thanks,
>
>   ...ant


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.

Paul

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:59 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should have voted myself, so +1.
>
>  Anyone else able to review and vote on this?
>
>    ...ant
>
>
>  On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>  >
>  > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
>  > artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
>  > repository, and RAT report are at:
>  > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a>
>
>
> >
>  > The tag for the release is at:
>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>  >
>  > KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>  >
>  > The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
>  > http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>  >
>  > Many thanks,
>  >
>  >    ...ant
>  >
>  >
>



-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>.
On 4/9/08, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Should have voted myself, so +1.
>
> Anyone else able to review and vote on this?


No blockers, +1 from me.

Matthieu

   ...ant
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
> >
> > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> > artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> > repository, and RAT report are at:
>
> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a>
>
> >
> > The tag for the release is at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
> >
> > KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> >
> > The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Should have voted myself, so +1.

Anyone else able to review and vote on this?

   ...ant

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>
> This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> repository, and RAT report are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a>
>
> The tag for the release is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>
> KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
> The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>
> Many thanks,
>
>    ...ant
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:47 AM, ant elder wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
>>
>>
>> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ 
>> impl/model/SDO.mdl
>>
>> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ 
>> impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml
>> ...
>>
>> Looks like most are test files. I won't quibble much about the test  
>> files.
>> Easiest (in the long run) to add license headers, IMO. Not sure  
>> what to make
>> of the SDO.mdl file.
>>
>
> For the .mdl one I believe it has not yet been found how to generate  
> it
> including the header, the few test files that don't include it i  
> think may
> need the files without header for the tests, either way, I don't  
> think its a
> blocking problem for those test files and they're covered by the top  
> level
> LICENSE and don't contain much much IP, eg:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml

K. If .mdl is generated, it need not include a header.

--kevan

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
wrote:

<snip>

For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
>
>
>  ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
>
>  ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml
> ...
>
> Looks like most are test files. I won't quibble much about the test files.
> Easiest (in the long run) to add license headers, IMO. Not sure what to make
> of the SDO.mdl file.
>

For the .mdl one I believe it has not yet been found how to generate it
including the header, the few test files that don't include it i think may
need the files without header for the tests, either way, I don't think its a
blocking problem for those test files and they're covered by the top level
LICENSE and don't contain much much IP, eg:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml

   ...ant

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:35 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
> > > (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also
> > > see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2].
> > >
> > > Is this what you were looking for ?
> > >
> >
> >  For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
> >
> >
> >
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
> >
> >
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml
> >  ...
> >
> >  Looks like most are test files. I won't quibble much about the test
> files.
> > Easiest (in the long run) to add license headers, IMO. Not sure what to
> make
> > of the SDO.mdl file.
> >
> >  Yes, I saw the simple osoa.org attribution in the notice file. However,
> IMO
> > that is not sufficient. I think the NOTICE should contain the copyright
> info
> > and I believe the OSOA license requires it. From the OSOA license:
> >
> >  1.    A link or URL to the Artifacts at this location:
> > http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Data+Objects+Specifications
> >
> >  2.    The full text of this copyright notice as shown in the Artifacts.
> >
> >  I would add both of those to the NOTICE file.
> >
>
> The NOTICE file is for attributions only.
>
> The rest goes in the LICENSE file, as has already been done


This was our understanding too which is why its been changed to be this way.

Have these replies clarified things enough, any further comments...or votes?

   ...ant

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>
> > The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
> > (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also
> > see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2].
> >
> > Is this what you were looking for ?
> >
>
>  For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
>
>
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
>
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml
>  ...
>
>  Looks like most are test files. I won't quibble much about the test files.
> Easiest (in the long run) to add license headers, IMO. Not sure what to make
> of the SDO.mdl file.
>
>  Yes, I saw the simple osoa.org attribution in the notice file. However, IMO
> that is not sufficient. I think the NOTICE should contain the copyright info
> and I believe the OSOA license requires it. From the OSOA license:
>
>  1.    A link or URL to the Artifacts at this location:
> http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Data+Objects+Specifications
>
>  2.    The full text of this copyright notice as shown in the Artifacts.
>
>  I would add both of those to the NOTICE file.
>

The NOTICE file is for attributions only.

The rest goes in the LICENSE file, as has already been done

>  --kevan
>
>
> >
> >
> > [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/LICENSE
> > [2]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/NOTICE
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ant,
> > > Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files that
> don't
> > > have src license headers?
> > >
> > > I also note that the commonj src files contain the following copyright
> > > statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as well as
> any
> > > jar files containing commonj classes...
> > >
> > >
> =======================================================================
> > >
> > >
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/sdo-api/src/main/java/commonj/sdo/ChangeSummary.java
> > >
> =======================================================================
> > >  /**
> > >  * <copyright>
> > >  *
> > >  * Service Data Objects
> > >  * Version 2.1.0
> > >  * Licensed Materials
> > >  *
> > >  * (c) Copyright BEA Systems, Inc., International Business Machines
> > > Corporation,
> > >  * Oracle Corporation, Primeton Technologies Ltd., Rogue Wave Software,
> SAP
> > > AG.,
> > >  * Software AG., Sun Microsystems, Sybase Inc., Xcalia, Zend
> Technologies,
> > >  * 2005, 2006. All rights reserved.
> > >  *
> > >  * </copyright>
> > >  *
> > >  */
> > >
> > > Everything else looked good to me.
> > >
> > > --kevan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
> > > >
> > > > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> > > > artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> > > > repository, and RAT report are at:
> > > >
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
> > > >
> > > > The tag for the release is at:
> > > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> > > > http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > >
> > > > ...ant
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:

> The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
> (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also
> see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2].
>
> Is this what you were looking for ?

For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:

  ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ 
impl/model/SDO.mdl
  ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ 
impl/src/test/resources/customer1.xml
...

Looks like most are test files. I won't quibble much about the test  
files. Easiest (in the long run) to add license headers, IMO. Not sure  
what to make of the SDO.mdl file.

Yes, I saw the simple osoa.org attribution in the notice file.  
However, IMO that is not sufficient. I think the NOTICE should contain  
the copyright info and I believe the OSOA license requires it. From  
the OSOA license:

1.    A link or URL to the Artifacts at this location:
http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Service+Data+Objects+Specifications

2.    The full text of this copyright notice as shown in the Artifacts.

I would add both of those to the NOTICE file.

--kevan

>
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/LICENSE
> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/NOTICE
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Kevan Miller  
> <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ant,
>> Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files  
>> that don't
>> have src license headers?
>>
>> I also note that the commonj src files contain the following  
>> copyright
>> statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as  
>> well as any
>> jar files containing commonj classes...
>>
>>   
>> = 
>> = 
>> =====================================================================
>>
>> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ 
>> sdo-api/src/main/java/commonj/sdo/ChangeSummary.java
>>   
>> = 
>> = 
>> =====================================================================
>>  /**
>>  * <copyright>
>>  *
>>  * Service Data Objects
>>  * Version 2.1.0
>>  * Licensed Materials
>>  *
>>  * (c) Copyright BEA Systems, Inc., International Business Machines
>> Corporation,
>>  * Oracle Corporation, Primeton Technologies Ltd., Rogue Wave  
>> Software, SAP
>> AG.,
>>  * Software AG., Sun Microsystems, Sybase Inc., Xcalia, Zend  
>> Technologies,
>>  * 2005, 2006. All rights reserved.
>>  *
>>  * </copyright>
>>  *
>>  */
>>
>> Everything else looked good to me.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>>>
>>> This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
>>> artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
>>> repository, and RAT report are at:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
>>>
>>> The tag for the release is at:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/ 
>>> 1.1/
>>>
>>> KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>>>
>>> The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
>>> http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
(search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also
see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2].

Is this what you were looking for ?

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/LICENSE
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/NOTICE

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>  Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files that don't
> have src license headers?
>
>  I also note that the commonj src files contain the following copyright
> statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as well as any
> jar files containing commonj classes...
>
>   =======================================================================
>
> ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/sdo-api/src/main/java/commonj/sdo/ChangeSummary.java
>   =======================================================================
>   /**
>   * <copyright>
>   *
>   * Service Data Objects
>   * Version 2.1.0
>   * Licensed Materials
>   *
>   * (c) Copyright BEA Systems, Inc., International Business Machines
> Corporation,
>   * Oracle Corporation, Primeton Technologies Ltd., Rogue Wave Software, SAP
> AG.,
>   * Software AG., Sun Microsystems, Sybase Inc., Xcalia, Zend Technologies,
>   * 2005, 2006. All rights reserved.
>   *
>   * </copyright>
>   *
>   */
>
>  Everything else looked good to me.
>
>  --kevan
>
>
>  On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>
> > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
> >
> > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> > artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> > repository, and RAT report are at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
> >
> > The tag for the release is at:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
> >
> > KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
> >
> > The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> > http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> >  ...ant
> >
>
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ant,
Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files that  
don't have src license headers?

I also note that the commonj src files contain the following copyright  
statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as well  
as any jar files containing commonj classes...

   
=======================================================================
  ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/sdo- 
api/src/main/java/commonj/sdo/ChangeSummary.java
   
=======================================================================
  /**
  * <copyright>
  *
  * Service Data Objects
  * Version 2.1.0
  * Licensed Materials
  *
  * (c) Copyright BEA Systems, Inc., International Business Machines  
Corporation,
  * Oracle Corporation, Primeton Technologies Ltd., Rogue Wave  
Software, SAP AG.,
  * Software AG., Sun Microsystems, Sybase Inc., Xcalia, Zend  
Technologies,
  * 2005, 2006. All rights reserved.
  *
  * </copyright>
  *
  */

Everything else looked good to me.

--kevan
On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote:

> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>
> This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> repository, and RAT report are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
>
> The tag for the release is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>
> KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
> The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>
> Many thanks,
>
>   ...ant


[RESULT][VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Passed with +1s from Matthieu, Paul, and me.

Thanks for the reviews everyone.

   ...ant

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
>
> This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
> artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
> repository, and RAT report are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a>
>
> The tag for the release is at:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1/
>
> KEYS file is at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS
>
> The tuscany-dev list vote thread is at:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/xgaeb7klnsfdkrmx
>
> Many thanks,
>
>    ...ant
>
>