Re: some issues for rescheduling?

[Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>]

Done.

Emmanuel

Brett Porter a écrit :
> Anyone have any thoughts on these, or should I just go ahead and make 
> the changes?
> 
> (Sorry Emmanuel, I know you've been offline a bit recently :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Brett
> 
> On 25/07/2007, at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Brett, I'll review them.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Brett Porter a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>> I took a look through future for things that could be adjusted, and 
>>> came up with the following list. I didn't want to 'just do it', since 
>>> I'm not that close to the status of the project right now, so if 
>>> someone could review these it'd be much appreciated.
>>> to close:
>>> CONTINUUM-933 (acegi branch)
>>> CONTINUUM-450 (the wagon notifier does this?)
>>> CONTINUUM-37 (superceded)
>>> CONTINUUM-516 (can't see why it's neeeded, enqueue is fast)
>>> CONTINUUM-924 (already exists?)
>>> CONTINUUM-841 (duplicate of 678, no longer an issue)
>>> CONTINUUM-1112 (seems fixed already)
>>> CONTINUUM-882 (from acegi)
>>> CONTINUUM-938 (I think it no longer applies - test and close)
>>> CONTINUUM-960 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-128 (no longer needed)
>>> CONTINUUM-640 (I think it dupes 347?)
>>> CONTINUUM-467 (I think it dupes 347?)
>>> CONTINUUM-344 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-721 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-737 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-660 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-751 (out of date?)
>>> CONTINUUM-752 (out of date?)
>>> CONTINUUM-1176 (out of date)
>>> CONTINUUM-1247 (not a Continuum bug?)
>>> CONTINUUM-1248 (not a Continuum bug?)
>>> CONTINUUM-1249 (not a Continuum bug?)
>>> CONTINUUM-1253 (won't fix - use mvn deploy instead)
>>> to schedule for 1.1:
>>> CONTINUUM-692 (possibly - talks about profile dependency being the 
>>> only blocker)
>>> CONTINUUM-347 (documentation)
>>> CONTINUUM-815 (documentation)
>>> CONTINUUM-1063 (just do it)
>>> CONTINUUM-618 (it's really annoying, and simple to fix)
>>> CONTINUUM-1037 (seems a fatal flaw in Ant use)
>>> CONTINUUM-811 (documentation)
>>> CONTINUUM-1079 (the feature exists, it's just not visible due to this 
>>> problem and probably related security issues)
>>> CONTINUUM-1310 (goes with above)
>>> CONTINUUM-1333
>>> CONTINUUM-1265 (NPE should generally be fixable)
>>> CONTINUUM-1255 (is ugly, should be easy to disable)
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brett
> 
> 
>