You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geode.apache.org by Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com> on 2022/10/20 21:24:02 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility.
> On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols <on...@vmware.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Once moved to the attic, it sounds like:
>
> * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain world-readable in perpetuity).
> * Geode would no longer be available for download on the geode download site or mirrors (but still available in releases tab in github).
> * Geode maven artifacts would remain available from mavencentral.
> * Geode homebrew formula would no longer be installable.
> * Unsure whether apachegeode/geode docker image would remain available?
> * Geode confluence wiki would become read-only.
> * It sound like the user mailing list may be able to remain active?
>
> Since no further release are possible without at least 3 active PMC members to provide the requisite 3 approving PMC votes, the Attic sounds like the best possible way to leave things.
>
> From: Dan Smith <da...@vmware.com.INVALID>
> Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <de...@geode.apache.org>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Unfortunately, it is time to consider moving Geode to the Apache attic. After VMware's announcement that it will stop contributing to Geode, we've tried in the last couple months to recruit additional contributors to continue supporting the project [1]. However, this last week there was a PMC role call on the private list and it appears we will only have one active PMC member after the VMware folks completely leave.
>
> I think at this point the responsible thing to do is dissolve the Geode PMC and move the project to the attic, unless some new contributors suddenly show up. We need a minimum of 3 PMC members to keep the project viable.
>
> This is not yet a vote. I'll let this discussion run this week and start a vote next week. I believe even if we vote to dissolve the project and move to the attic, the soonest that process would start would be after the November board meeting [2].
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
>
> [1] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0
> [2] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
RE: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Posted by ru...@webstersystems.co.uk.
It *is* a great product, that’s why VMware won’t support the open source version any more. $$$
From: pieter van zyl <pv...@gmail.com>
Sent: 21 October 2022 11:37
To: user@geode.apache.org
Cc: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Sounds very sad to me! Really thought this was a great product
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:24 PM Anthony Baker <bakera@vmware.com <ma...@vmware.com> > wrote:
Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility.
> On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols <onichols@vmware.com.INVALID <ma...@vmware.com.INVALID> > wrote:
>
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Once moved to the attic, it sounds like:
>
> * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain world-readable in perpetuity).
> * Geode would no longer be available for download on the geode download site or mirrors (but still available in releases tab in github).
> * Geode maven artifacts would remain available from mavencentral.
> * Geode homebrew formula would no longer be installable.
> * Unsure whether apachegeode/geode docker image would remain available?
> * Geode confluence wiki would become read-only.
> * It sound like the user mailing list may be able to remain active?
>
> Since no further release are possible without at least 3 active PMC members to provide the requisite 3 approving PMC votes, the Attic sounds like the best possible way to leave things.
>
> From: Dan Smith <dasmith@vmware.com.INVALID <ma...@vmware.com.INVALID> >
> Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <ma...@geode.apache.org> <dev@geode.apache.org <ma...@geode.apache.org> >
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Unfortunately, it is time to consider moving Geode to the Apache attic. After VMware's announcement that it will stop contributing to Geode, we've tried in the last couple months to recruit additional contributors to continue supporting the project [1]. However, this last week there was a PMC role call on the private list and it appears we will only have one active PMC member after the VMware folks completely leave.
>
> I think at this point the responsible thing to do is dissolve the Geode PMC and move the project to the attic, unless some new contributors suddenly show up. We need a minimum of 3 PMC members to keep the project viable.
>
> This is not yet a vote. I'll let this discussion run this week and start a vote next week. I believe even if we vote to dissolve the project and move to the attic, the soonest that process would start would be after the November board meeting [2].
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
>
> [1] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0> &data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0
> [2] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0> &data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
RE: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Posted by ru...@webstersystems.co.uk.
It *is* a great product, that’s why VMware won’t support the open source version any more. $$$
From: pieter van zyl <pv...@gmail.com>
Sent: 21 October 2022 11:37
To: user@geode.apache.org
Cc: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Sounds very sad to me! Really thought this was a great product
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:24 PM Anthony Baker <bakera@vmware.com <ma...@vmware.com> > wrote:
Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility.
> On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols <onichols@vmware.com.INVALID <ma...@vmware.com.INVALID> > wrote:
>
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Once moved to the attic, it sounds like:
>
> * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain world-readable in perpetuity).
> * Geode would no longer be available for download on the geode download site or mirrors (but still available in releases tab in github).
> * Geode maven artifacts would remain available from mavencentral.
> * Geode homebrew formula would no longer be installable.
> * Unsure whether apachegeode/geode docker image would remain available?
> * Geode confluence wiki would become read-only.
> * It sound like the user mailing list may be able to remain active?
>
> Since no further release are possible without at least 3 active PMC members to provide the requisite 3 approving PMC votes, the Attic sounds like the best possible way to leave things.
>
> From: Dan Smith <dasmith@vmware.com.INVALID <ma...@vmware.com.INVALID> >
> Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <ma...@geode.apache.org> <dev@geode.apache.org <ma...@geode.apache.org> >
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
> ⚠ External Email
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Unfortunately, it is time to consider moving Geode to the Apache attic. After VMware's announcement that it will stop contributing to Geode, we've tried in the last couple months to recruit additional contributors to continue supporting the project [1]. However, this last week there was a PMC role call on the private list and it appears we will only have one active PMC member after the VMware folks completely leave.
>
> I think at this point the responsible thing to do is dissolve the Geode PMC and move the project to the attic, unless some new contributors suddenly show up. We need a minimum of 3 PMC members to keep the project viable.
>
> This is not yet a vote. I'll let this discussion run this week and start a vote next week. I believe even if we vote to dissolve the project and move to the attic, the soonest that process would start would be after the November board meeting [2].
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
>
> [1] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0> &data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0
> [2] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0> &data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Posted by pieter van zyl <pv...@gmail.com>.
Sounds very sad to me! Really thought this was a great product
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:24 PM Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility.
>
> > On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols <on...@vmware.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > ⚠ External Email
> >
> > Once moved to the attic, it sounds like:
> >
> > * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain
> world-readable in perpetuity).
> > * Geode would no longer be available for download on the geode
> download site or mirrors (but still available in releases tab in github).
> > * Geode maven artifacts would remain available from mavencentral.
> > * Geode homebrew formula would no longer be installable.
> > * Unsure whether apachegeode/geode docker image would remain
> available?
> > * Geode confluence wiki would become read-only.
> > * It sound like the user mailing list may be able to remain active?
> >
> > Since no further release are possible without at least 3 active PMC
> members to provide the requisite 3 approving PMC votes, the Attic sounds
> like the best possible way to leave things.
> >
> > From: Dan Smith <da...@vmware.com.INVALID>
> > Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org <de...@geode.apache.org>
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
> > ⚠ External Email
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Unfortunately, it is time to consider moving Geode to the Apache attic.
> After VMware's announcement that it will stop contributing to Geode, we've
> tried in the last couple months to recruit additional contributors to
> continue supporting the project [1]. However, this last week there was a
> PMC role call on the private list and it appears we will only have one
> active PMC member after the VMware folks completely leave.
> >
> > I think at this point the responsible thing to do is dissolve the Geode
> PMC and move the project to the attic, unless some new contributors
> suddenly show up. We need a minimum of 3 PMC members to keep the project
> viable.
> >
> > This is not yet a vote. I'll let this discussion run this week and start
> a vote next week. I believe even if we vote to dissolve the project and
> move to the attic, the soonest that process would start would be after the
> November board meeting [2].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Dan
> >
> > [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0
> > [2]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the
> organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
> the sender.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
Posted by pieter van zyl <pv...@gmail.com>.
Sounds very sad to me! Really thought this was a great product
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:24 PM Anthony Baker <ba...@vmware.com> wrote:
> Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility.
>
> > On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols <on...@vmware.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > ⚠ External Email
> >
> > Once moved to the attic, it sounds like:
> >
> > * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain
> world-readable in perpetuity).
> > * Geode would no longer be available for download on the geode
> download site or mirrors (but still available in releases tab in github).
> > * Geode maven artifacts would remain available from mavencentral.
> > * Geode homebrew formula would no longer be installable.
> > * Unsure whether apachegeode/geode docker image would remain
> available?
> > * Geode confluence wiki would become read-only.
> > * It sound like the user mailing list may be able to remain active?
> >
> > Since no further release are possible without at least 3 active PMC
> members to provide the requisite 3 approving PMC votes, the Attic sounds
> like the best possible way to leave things.
> >
> > From: Dan Smith <da...@vmware.com.INVALID>
> > Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM
> > To: dev@geode.apache.org <de...@geode.apache.org>
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic
> > ⚠ External Email
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Unfortunately, it is time to consider moving Geode to the Apache attic.
> After VMware's announcement that it will stop contributing to Geode, we've
> tried in the last couple months to recruit additional contributors to
> continue supporting the project [1]. However, this last week there was a
> PMC role call on the private list and it appears we will only have one
> active PMC member after the VMware folks completely leave.
> >
> > I think at this point the responsible thing to do is dissolve the Geode
> PMC and move the project to the attic, unless some new contributors
> suddenly show up. We need a minimum of 3 PMC members to keep the project
> viable.
> >
> > This is not yet a vote. I'll let this discussion run this week and start
> a vote next week. I believe even if we vote to dissolve the project and
> move to the attic, the soonest that process would start would be after the
> November board meeting [2].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Dan
> >
> > [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fd88byb42gm5wplzqwkgywg3w9vtj64dr&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i%2F5d4tbX1dlG79Utb92vyg9R%2BXE87QaPOMgAWEshFDA%3D&reserved=0
> > [2]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fattic.apache.org%2Fprocess.html&data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7C7c3e8f87539d48afa83408dab1399403%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638017158136565386%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FC6THZfQgattsCrwSXGudfUVziKTK819eTXanqWm3XE%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ⚠ External Email: This email originated from outside of the
> organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
> the sender.
>
>