You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@groovy.apache.org by "Shil Sinha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/14 16:46:33 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-7774) Collection addAll fails CompileStatic type checking when adding a collection of subtypes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15193509#comment-15193509 ] 

Shil Sinha commented on GROOVY-7774:
------------------------------------

The compiler determines the target method for `set.addAll(toAdd)` to be `DefaultGroovyMethods#addAll(Collection<T>, Iterable<T>) rather than `Collection<E>#addAll(Collection<? extends E>)`, resulting in the error you described due to the lack of wildcard on the iterable parameter to the DGM addAll method.

> Collection addAll fails CompileStatic type checking when adding a collection of subtypes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-7774
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7774
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: groovy-jdk
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.3
>         Environment: Windows, Java 8.
>            Reporter: Darren Hurt
>
> Suppose X is an interface and Y an interface such that Y extends X
> The following code throws a compilation error (the outer class is annotated as @CompileStatic).
> Set<X> set = new HashSet<X>()
> Set<Y> toAdd = ......
> set.addAll(toAdd)
> However, the following works, which to me is inconsistent:
> Set<X> set = new HashSet<X>()
> Set<Y> toAdd = ......
> for(Y y in toAdd)
> {
> set.add(y)
> }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)