[jira] Reopened: (HBASE-3374) Our jruby jar has *GPL jars in it; fix

["Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell reopened HBASE-3374:
-----------------------------------

      Assignee:     (was: stack)

Alright Charles, leaving the meta issue of whether Ruby syntax is really what people want long term for the shell, reopening this issue perhaps to upgrade to an ASF-clean JRuby for the next HBase release if JRuby sorts the licensing issues out.

> Our jruby jar has *GPL jars in it; fix
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3374
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.90.1, 0.92.0
>
>         Attachments: jruby.txt
>
>
> The latest JRuby's complete jar bundles *GPL jars (JNA and JFFI among others).   It looks like the functionality we depend on -- the shell in particular -- makes use of these dirty jars so they are hard to strip.  They came in because we (I!) just updated our JRuby w/o checking in on what updates contained.  JRuby has been doing this for a while now (1.1.x added the first LGPL).  You have to go all the ways back to the original HBase checkin, HBASE-487, of JRuby -- 1.0.3 -- to get a JRuby w/o *GPL jars.
> Plan is to try and revert our JRuby all the ways down to 1.0.3 before shipping 0.90.0.  Thats what this issue is about.
> We should also look into moving off JRuby in the medium to long-term.  Its kinda awkward sticking on an old version that is no longer supported.  I'll open an issue for that.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.