You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org> on 2017/04/13 18:38:14 UTC
[log4j] Performance comparsion
Hi,
found this:
https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Stephen? He’s a nice guy. He contributes to Apache Maven. I’ve always found him to be easy to work with.
I can see that the post is still in Pending status. It is unclear from the site who has to moderate it.
Ralph
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 9:32 AM, Remko Popma <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Moderated?
> I noticed that the author enjoys taking strong positions on things but at
> the same time finds it inconceivable that he could be wrong.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I’m not sure why my comment has not appeared…
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I posted a comment on the post as I think he missed a couple of things.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> found this:
>>>> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-
>> has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_
>> medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>.
Usually Disqus comments are moderated. But actually I thought it's
moderated from the Sitepoint team, not the author. But who knows...
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017, at 18:32, Remko Popma wrote:
> Moderated?
> I noticed that the author enjoys taking strong positions on things but at
> the same time finds it inconceivable that he could be wrong.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I’m not sure why my comment has not appeared…
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I posted a comment on the post as I think he missed a couple of things.
> > >
> > > Ralph
> > >
> > >> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> found this:
> > >> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-
> > has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_
> > medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Remko Popma <re...@gmail.com>.
Moderated?
I noticed that the author enjoys taking strong positions on things but at
the same time finds it inconceivable that he could be wrong.
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
> I’m not sure why my comment has not appeared…
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I posted a comment on the post as I think he missed a couple of things.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> found this:
> >> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-
> has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_
> medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I’m not sure why my comment has not appeared…
Ralph
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> I posted a comment on the post as I think he missed a couple of things.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> found this:
>> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
>>
>
>
>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I posted a comment on the post as I think he missed a couple of things.
Ralph
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> found this:
> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, at 22:47, Ralph Goers wrote:
> You have commit rights…. ;-)
hehe :-)
And I actually feel the Open Source itch! Hopefully I can make some
proposal!
> Ralph
>
> > On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > and what I wanted to write before hitting "send" to early: I think
> > Stephen is right with saying we need to improve the docs. Log4j1 docs
> > were bad, 2 is much better, but I think we can do much, much better.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, at 20:38, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> found this:
> >> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
> >
>
>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
You have commit rights…. ;-)
Ralph
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> and what I wanted to write before hitting "send" to early: I think
> Stephen is right with saying we need to improve the docs. Log4j1 docs
> were bad, 2 is much better, but I think we can do much, much better.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, at 20:38, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> found this:
>> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
>
Re: [log4j] Performance comparsion
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@apache.org>.
and what I wanted to write before hitting "send" to early: I think
Stephen is right with saying we need to improve the docs. Log4j1 docs
were bad, 2 is much better, but I think we can do much, much better.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017, at 20:38, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> found this:
> https://www.sitepoint.com/which-java-logging-framework-has-the-best-performance/?utm_content=buffer79511&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer